Indexed in Journament

management science letters

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,558 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
74 Articles
Scores higher than 81% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

الاسم المختصر management science letters
الاسم المختصر management science letters
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.1
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 73.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.4
Accessibility — 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity — 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 7.9 7.8
Content Distribution 73.5 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (74)

2018
life role salience and subjective well-being among macedonian employees: does family-supportive organization perception moderate this relationship
;Biljana Blaževska Stoilkovska;Orhideja Šurbanovska;Ana Fritzhand;Tatjana Stojanoska Ivanova
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 281-291
512 views DOI Abstract
2018
association between metabolic syndrome and disability due to low back pain among care workers
;Yamato Tsuboi;Yuya Ueda;Taiki Sugimoto;Fumihiro Naruse;Rei Ono
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 165-172
494 views DOI Abstract
2019
Female directorship and real earnings management in Bangladesh: Towards an analytical assessment
Debnath, Nitai Chandra;, B.C.M. Patnaik;, Ipseeta Satpathy;
Vol. 9 , No. 11 , pp. 1723-1740
451 views Abstract
2018
lipopolysaccharide accelerates fine particulate matter-induced cell apoptosis in human lung bronchial epithelial cells
;Qin Ru;Qi Xiong;Lin Chen;Xiang Tian;Kai Yue;Baomiao Ma;Lu Liu;Rihui Wu;Congyue Xu;Mingshan Pi;Chaoying Li
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 173-183
451 views DOI Abstract
2013
A study on the effect of advertisements on customers' willingness to accept banking services based on modulatory role of brand: A case study of Bank Parsian
Jahan, Ali;Danaei, Abolfazl;Saeidfar, Mohammad;
Vol. 3 , No. 5 , pp. 1439-1444
410 views Abstract
2017
do workers’ health surveillance examinations fulfill their occupational preventive objective? analysis of the medical practice of occupational physicians in catalonia, spain
;Mari Cruz Rodríguez-Jareño;Emilia Molinero;Jaume de Montserrat;Antoni Vallès;Marta Aymerich
Vol. 30 , No. 6 , pp. 823-848
402 views DOI Abstract
2013
An exploration study on factors influencing Iranian food industry
Hosseinzadeh, Arash;Seyedaliakbar, Seyed Mohsen;Azad, Naser;Arabi, Ashkan;
Vol. 3 , No. 5 , pp. 1315-1322
397 views Abstract
2012
A hybrid model of QFD, SERVQUAL and KANO to increase bank's capabilities
Rajabi, Hasan;Kashi, Mohsen;Astanbous, Mohammad Ali;Javidnia, Mojtaba;
Vol. 2 , No. 6 , pp. 1931-1938
394 views Abstract
2020
Exploring the influence of transformational leadership on work engagement and workplace spirituality of academic employees in the private higher education institutions in Malaysia
Arokiasamy, A.
Vol. 10 , pp. 855-864
390 views DOI
2019
Factors influencing the information quality of local government financial statement and financial accountability
Dewi, N.
Vol. 9 , pp. 1373-1384
387 views DOI
2020
Impact of visual merchandising on the purchase decision of consumers from retail stores in central Peru
Cordova, G.I.
Vol. 10 , pp. 2447-2454
130 views DOI
2020
The effect of website quality and government regulations on online impulse buying behavior
Hayu, R.
Vol. 10 , pp. 961-968
207 views DOI
2020
A mediation effect of new public management on the relationship between intelligence, leadership, HR quality and performance of local government employees in Indonesia
Hamid, H.
Vol. 10 , pp. 1401-1408
190 views DOI
2020
Improving the quality of Internet banking services: An implementation of the quality function deployment (QFD) concept
Adiandari, A.
Vol. 10 , pp. 1121-1128
193 views DOI
2020
The impact of capital structure on the performance of microfinance institutions
Almansour, A.
Vol. 10 , pp. 881-888
223 views DOI
2020
Investigating the effects of customer-based brand equity on turnover intentions with mediating effect of customer citizenship behavior
Raza, M.
Vol. 10 , pp. 279-286
218 views DOI
2020
Vitality of work involvement in mediation: The effect of organizational justice on organizational citizenship behavior
Sujono, D.
Vol. 10 , pp. 1061-1068
213 views DOI
2020
Food safety knowledge, attitude and practices among management and science university students, Shah Alam
Sayuti, Y.
Vol. 10 , pp. 929-936
132 views DOI
2020
Teacher’s performance management: The role of principal’s leadership, work environment and motivation in Tegal City, Indonesia
Hartinah, S.
Vol. 10 , pp. 235-246
218 views DOI
2020
Forecasting domestic credit growth based on ARIMA model: Evidence from Vietnam and China
van, Dinh D.
Vol. 10 , pp. 1001-1010
218 views DOI
Journament Score
37.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,558 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.