Indexed in Journament

chest

ISSN 1931-3543· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
49.8 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #76 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
27 Articles
Scores higher than 99.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name chest
Abbreviated Name chest
ISSN 1931-3543

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 60.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.0
Content Distribution 75.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for chest
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 60.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 10.0 7.8
Content Distribution 75.5 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (27)

1990
Diagnostic value of nonfluoroscopic percutaneous lung needle aspiration in patients with pneumonia
Vol. 98 , No. 4 , pp. -
546 views Abstract
2000
Community-acquired pneumonia: etiology, epidemiology, and outcome at a teaching hospital in Argentina
Vol. 118 , No. 5 , pp. -
528 views Abstract
2007
Contribution of a pleural antigen assay (Binax NOW) to the diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia
Vol. 131 , No. 5 , pp. -
458 views Abstract
2002
Evaluation of the polymerase chain reaction method for detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae DNA in pleural fluid samples
Vol. 122 , No. 6 , pp. -
427 views Abstract
2018
Impact of a Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Educational Program for Interdisciplinary Teams.
Vol. 153 , No. 4 , pp. 876-887
405 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Role of Chest Imaging in Patient Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multinational Consensus Statement from the Fleischner Society.
399 views DOI Abstract
2020
PICTORIAL REVIEW OF THORACIC PARASITIC DISEASES: A RADIOLOGICAL GUIDE.
391 views DOI Abstract
2020
New Billing Rules for Outpatient Office Visit Codes.
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparative Effectiveness of Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Resectable Lung Cancer in Older Patients.
379 views DOI Abstract
2021
A 43-Year-Old Man With Rapidly Respiratory Failure and Spontaneous Massive Hemothorax
Vol. 159 , No. 4 , pp. -
158 views Abstract
2021
Eosinophilic Pleural Effusion in a Young Woman With Pleural Nodularity and Lytic Skeletal Lesions
Vol. 159 , No. 4 , pp. -
166 views Abstract
2020
A 21-Year-Old Immune-Competent Man With Recurrent Cough.
Vol. 157 , No. 4 , pp. e111-e113
263 views DOI Abstract
2020
Standardized Bleeding Definitions After Transbronchial Lung Biopsy: A Delphi Consensus Statement From the Nashville Working Group.
343 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Role of Chest Imaging in Patient Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multinational Consensus Statement from the Fleischner Society.
399 views DOI Abstract
2020
2020
Treatment with convalescent plasma for critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
319 views DOI Abstract
2020
New Billing Rules for Outpatient Office Visit Codes.
386 views DOI Abstract
2020
PICTORIAL REVIEW OF THORACIC PARASITIC DISEASES: A RADIOLOGICAL GUIDE.
391 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
49.8/100 · Below Average
Ranked #76 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

49.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.