brazilian journal of food technology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#289 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

brazilian journal of food technology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name brazilian journal of food technology
Abbreviated Name brazilian journal of food technology
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://bjft.ital.sp.gov.br
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (31 total)

2018
Effects of different drying methods on the bioactive compounds and antioxidant properties of edible Centaurea (Centaurea cyanus) petals
Fernandes L.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
510 views DOI
2012
Water barrier properties of starch-clay nanocomposite films Propriedades de barreira à água de filmes de nanocompósitos de amido e argila
Slavutsky, Aníbal Marcelo;Bertuzzi, María Alejandra;Armada, Margarita;
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 208-218
301 views Abstract
2013
the debris of urban imagination
;Claudio Sgarbi
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 265-296
294 views DOI Abstract
2013
Active packaged lamb with oxygen scavenger/carbon dioxide emitter sachet: physical-chemical and microbiological stability during refrigerated storage
Trindade, Marco Antonio;Villanueva, Nilda Doris Montes;Antunes, Catharine Vendemiatto;Freire, Maria Teresa de Alvarenga;
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 216-225
288 views Abstract
2017
Determination of thermotolerant coliforms present in coconut water produced and bottled in the Northeast of Brazil
Pereira, Vandbergue Santos;Mendes, Johnatan Wellisson da Silva;Oliveira, Lorena Alves;Mangueira, Carlos Eberton Alves;Rodrigues, Edlânia Moraes;Figueredo, Fernando Gomes;
Vol. 21 , pp. -
258 views Abstract
2014
abandoned highway sections: an opportunity for requalification landscape projects
;Lucia Moretti;Mattia Ricci;Stefano Politi;Fabio Spena
Vol. 5 , No. 7 , pp. 273-280
254 views DOI Abstract
2013
open spaces, public spaces, publics, open-minded places
;Luisa Bravo
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 1-4
250 views DOI Abstract
2012
l’ampliamento come occasione di recupero della memoria e dell’identità
;Giuseppe Pellitteri;Alessia Riccobono;Dario Riccobono
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 119-128
239 views DOI Abstract
2011
innovazione nel patrimonio dei fari italiani. un progetto di conservazione e uso sostenibile per la “luce” sarda di capo spartivento
;Cristiana Bartolomei
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 109-120
236 views DOI Abstract
2013
contemporary architecture; art; selezione architettura: historical heritage
;Andrea Zanelli
Vol. 4 , No. 6 , pp. 211-222
234 views DOI Abstract
View All 31 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
50
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.