Frontiers in surgery | Journament

Journal Ranking

#414 / 33,972
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
44.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
60
Timeliness
100
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

Frontiers in surgery

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj
Short Name Front Surg
Abbreviated Name frontiers in surgery
ISSN 2296-875X
Aim and Scope
Frontiers in Surgery is a multidisciplinary journal publishing advances and research findings in surgical practice to improve clinical management of patients and foster surgical innovation. The journal is indexed in PubMed Central (PMC), Scopus, and Web of Science (SCIE) among others. Led by Field Chief Editor Dr Dennis Paul Orgill (Harvard Medical School, USA), Frontiers in Surgery seeks to assemble clinical and experimental research across all surgical specialties to foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. Although the advanced skills now required from surgeons have led to ever increasing specialization, these still share important fundamental principles. Topics include: • genitourinary surgery • heart surgery • neurosurgery • obstetrics and gynecological surgery • orthopedic surgery • otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery • pediatric orthopedics • pediatric surgery • pediatric urology • reconstructive and plastic surgery • surgical oncology • thoracic surgery • vascular surgery • visceral surgery. In particular, the journal welcomes submissions which support and advance the UN’s Sustainable Development Goal (SDG), notably SDG 3: ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. Manuscripts that focus solely on the prognosis of diseases, the efficacy of non-surgical treatments, or the statistical analysis of patient outcomes without a relevance to surgical procedures or advancements are not suitable for publication in this journal. Studies that do not directly contribute to the field of surgery, such as those primarily concerned with general medical care or disease diagnosis, are also outside the journal's scope. Frontiers’ journals require that manuscripts primarily comprising computational studies of public data, must include appropriate validation. Please refer to the Frontiers Standards for research methodology policy, for more information. Manuscripts not adhering to these standards will not be considered. Frontiers in Surgery is committed to advancing developments in the field of surgery by allowing unrestricted access to articles, and communicating scientific knowledge to researchers and the public alike, to enable the scientific breakthroughs of the future.
URL https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/surgery
Author Instructions https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/surgery/for-authors/author-guidelines
Added by Said Nadeem on Sep 01, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (490 total)

2016
Genetic Alterations in Intervertebral Disc Disease
Martirosyan, Nikolay L.;Patel, Arpan A.;Carotenuto, Alessandro;Kalani, M. Yashar S.;Belykh, Evgenii;Walker, Corey T.;Preul, Mark C.;Theodore, Nicholas;
Vol. 3 , pp. -
307 views Abstract
2017
Management of Peripheral and Truncal Venous Injuries
Giannakopoulos, Triantafillos G.;Avgerinos, Efthymios D.;
Vol. 4 , pp. -
161 views Abstract
2022
Efficacy and Tolerability of a New Formulation in Rectal Ointment Based on Zn-L-Carnosine (Proctilor®) in the Treatment of Haemorrhoidal Disease.
Pietroletti, Renato;Giuliani, Antonio;Buonanno, Alberto;Mattei, Antonella;Fiasca, Fabiana;Gallo, Gaetano;
Vol. 9 , pp. 818887
105 views DOI Abstract
2022
Surgical Techniques for Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: One Size Does Not Fit All
Simon Wilkins; Raymond Yap; Shehara Mendis; Peter Carne; Paul J. McMurrick
41 views DOI Abstract
2026
Commentary: The contribution of personalized video feedback to robotic partial nephrectomy training in realistic 3D tumor kidney models: design, production and implementation
Yang, Wenjiang
Vol. 12 , pp. 1738938
35 views DOI Abstract
2026
Comparative safety and short-term outcomes of intraoperative radiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective study
Ma, Minghui
Vol. 12 , pp. 1713146
34 views DOI Abstract
2026
Initial experience with single-port robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using the Low Anterior Access (LAA): perioperative outcomes and learning curve analysis in a Belgian SP-naive tertiary robotic referral center
Decaestecker, Karel
Vol. 12 , pp. 1734877
34 views DOI Abstract
2026
The clinical efficacy of novel semirigid ureteroscopy with a vacuum suction device for treatment of >10 mm upper ureteral stones and impacted calculus: implications for clinical practice
Mi, Jun
Vol. 12 , pp. 1656819
32 views DOI Abstract
2026
Renal artery pseudoaneurysm following holmium laser diverticular neck incision for calyceal diverticular stones: a rare case report
Yin, Min
Vol. 12 , pp. 1743526
31 views DOI Abstract
2026
Advancing the implementation of artificial intelligence in regulatory frameworks for chemical safety assessment by defining robust readiness criteria
Fritsche, Ellen
Vol. 8 , pp. 1738770
31 views DOI Abstract
View All 490 Articles
44
Overall
Below Average
30
60
30
40
38
100
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

44.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

60.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.