Comparative safety and short-term outcomes of intraoperative radiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective study
Clicks: 61
ID: 310071
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
18.0
/100
61 views
9 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #8 of 490 articles by views in Frontiers in surgery
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 490 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
PurposeNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) constitutes an integral component of the standard therapeutic strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) but carries cumulative toxicity, cost, and occasional non-response. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) delivers a single high dosage directly to the tumor bed and may overcome these limitations. We compared short-term efficacy and safety of low-kilovoltage(kV) x-ray IORT with long-course nCRT.MethodsLARC patients treated at Maoming People's Hospital (2022–2024) were retrospectively reviewed. The nCRT cohort received 45–50 Gy radiotherapy plus capecitabine before surgery; the IORT cohort underwent INTRABEAM low-kV x-ray IORT (12.5–20 Gy) during surgery. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), postoperative complications, and recurrence were analyzed. Survival was estimated by Kaplan–Meier curves.ResultsA total of 67 patients were included (46 in nCRT, 21 in IORT). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed no significant difference in DFS or OS between the IORT and nCRT groups (DFS P = 0.669; OS P = 0.864). 3-year DFS (53.7% vs. 52.8%, P = 0.669) and OS (89.0% vs. 78.4%, P = 0.864) did not differ between IORT and nCRT. Early postoperative bowel obstruction and urinary retention were more frequent after IORT, although neither difference was significant; long-term complications and recurrence patterns remained comparable between the groups.ConclusionSingle-fraction low-kV IORT provides short-term survival equivalent to standard nCRT with acceptable perioperative safety. It is a viable option for LARC patients unable or unwilling to undergo prolonged nCRT, although vigilance for early gastrointestinal and urinary complications is warranted.
| Reference Key |
imported_1768922046_696f9bbec11c2
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Ma, Minghui |
| Journal | Frontiers in surgery |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.3389/fsurg.2025.1713146
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.