journal of chemical health risks | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2070 / 33,950
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
32
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of chemical health risks

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name journal of chemical health risks
Abbreviated Name journal of chemical health risks
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.jchr.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (51 total)

2016
Chemical Composition of Hexane Extract of Different Parts of Anthemis talyschensis and its Potential to Use in Sunscreen Products
Motavalizadehkakhky, Alireza;Shafaghat, Ali;Mehrzad, Jamshid;Shafaghatlonbar, Masoud;Azimi, Farzaneh;Ebrahimi, Zohreh;Sakeri, Abollfazl;
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. -
419 views Abstract
2018
Fabrication of Mesoporous Silica-coated Graphene Oxide by New Method and Application in Solid Phase Extraction for Preconcentration of Cu2+
Moghimi, Ali;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. -
411 views Abstract
2016
tendencias de mortalidad y años potenciales de vida perdidos por cáncer gástrico en méxico, 2000-2012
;J.J. Sánchez-Barriga
Vol. 81 , No. 2 , pp. 65-73
405 views DOI Abstract
2015
Evaluation Effects of Verapamil as a Calcium Channel Blocker on Acquisition, Consolidation and Retrieval of Memory in Mice
Masoudian, Nooshin;Masoudian, Nahid;Pour, Ali Rashidy;Vafaiee, Abbas Ali;Andalib, Sasan;Vaseghi, Golnaz;
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. -
403 views Abstract
2012
colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica en un hospital regional del instituto mexicano del seguro social, 2002-2011: factores de riesgo y complicaciones
;G.A. Reyes-Moctezuma;L.S. Suárez-Peredo;M.R. Reyes-Bastidas;M.A. Ríos-Ayala;J.E. Rosales-Leal;I. Osuna-Ramírez
Vol. 77 , No. 3 , pp. 125-129
402 views DOI Abstract
2014
Evaluation of Aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis Miller) Antioxidant Activity and Some of the Morphological Characteristics in Different Vermicompost Field
Yavari, Z.;Moradi, H.;Sadeghi, H.;Golchini, B. Barzegar;
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. -
384 views Abstract
2019
Improving the physicochemical and antioxidant properties of fish floss incorporated with waste cassava leaves
Poonsri T.
Vol. 9 , pp. 27-34
378 views DOI
2018
Determine the Quality of Bread Samples Used in Qazvin, Iran
Qajarbeygi, Peyman;Kazeminia, Masoud;Mahmoudi, Razzagh;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. -
343 views Abstract
2019
Hematological, histopathological and growth performance studies on albino rats fed on mystus gulio fillet with formulated cereal
Ara, M.
Vol. 9 , pp. 1-10
300 views DOI
2014
Effect of Bread Making Process on Aflatoxin Level Changes
Milani, Jafar;Nazari, Seyed Saman Seyed;Bamyar, Elmira;Maleki, Gisou;
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. -
287 views Abstract
View All 51 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
32
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.