Aging cell | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3569 / 33,957
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

Aging cell

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Aging Cell
Abbreviated Name aging cell
ISSN 1474-9726
Aim and Scope
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1474-9726
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (16 total)

2019
Tau oligomers mediate aggregation of RNA-binding proteins Musashi1 and Musashi2 inducing Lamin alteration.
Montalbano, Mauro;McAllen, Salome;Sengupta, Urmi;Puangmalai, Nicha;Bhatt, Nemil;Ellsworth, Anna;Kayed, Rakez;
, pp. e13035
463 views DOI Abstract
2020
"Amyloid-beta accumulation cycle" as a prevention and/or therapy target for Alzheimer's disease.
Rao, Chinthalapally V;Asch, Adam S;Carr, Daniel J J;Yamada, Hiroshi Y;
, pp. e13109
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
Wnt/β-catenin/RAS signaling mediates age-related renal fibrosis and is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction.
Miao, Jinhua;Liu, Jiafeng;Niu, Jing;Zhang, Yunfang;Shen, Weiwei;Luo, Congwei;Liu, Yahong;Li, Chuanjiang;Li, Hongyan;Yang, Peiliang;Liu, Youhua;Hou, Fan Fan;Zhou, Lili;
, pp. e13004
332 views DOI Abstract
2020
Tissue specificity of senescent cell accumulation during physiologic and accelerated aging of mice.
Yousefzadeh, Matthew J;Zhao, Jing;Bukata, Christina;Wade, Erin A;McGowan, Sara J;Angelini, Luise A;Bank, Michael P;Gurkar, Aditi U;McGuckian, Collin A;Calubag, Mariah F;Kato, Jonathan I;Burd, Christin E;Robbins, Paul D;Niedernhofer, Laura J;
, pp. e13094
308 views DOI Abstract
2016
pelaksanaan pemberi bantuan hukum dikaitkan dengan undang-undang no. 16 tahun 2011 tentang bantuan hukum
;Iwan Wahyu Pujiarto;Syafruddin Kalo;Edy Ikhsan
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 318-341
225 views DOI Abstract
2013
imprisonment for iuu fishing in indonesia’s exclusive economic zone: why it should not be imposed
;Alfons Zakaria
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 86-97
219 views DOI Abstract
2008
Compromised store-operated Ca2entry in aged skeletal muscle
Xiaoli Zhao,Noah Weisleder,Angela Thornton,Yaa Oppong,Rachel Campbell,Jianjie Ma,Marco Brotto;Xiaoli Zhao;Noah Weisleder;Angela Thornton;Yaa Oppong;Rachel Campbell;Jianjie Ma;Marco Brotto;
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 561-568
213 views DOI Abstract
2016
pembatasan hak bagi pemilik sertifikat hak milik atas tanah di wilayah adat kebirangga kecamatan maukaro kabupaten ende (studi di wilayah adat kebirangga kecamatan maukaro kabupaten ende)
;Maria Cicilia Pricemarina
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 428-446
186 views DOI Abstract
2014
negara hukum, program legislasi nasional dan kebutuhan desain besar bagi perencanaannya
;Bambang Kesowo
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 12-20
171 views DOI Abstract
2013
hukum internasional sebagai instrumen politik: beberapa pengalaman indonesia sebagai studi kasus
;Hikmahanto Juwana
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 106-114
170 views DOI Abstract
View All 16 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.