Biological chemistry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2472 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Biological chemistry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Biol Chem
Abbreviated Name biol chem
ISSN 1437-4315
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bchm
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (35 total)

2019
More than just a pressure relief valve: physiological roles of volume-regulated LRRC8 anion channels.
Chen, Lingye;König, Benjamin;Liu, Tianbao;Pervaiz, Sumaira;Razzaque, Yasmin S;Stauber, Tobias;
411 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comprehensive analysis of peptides and low molecular weight components of the giant ant Dinoponera quadriceps venom.
Rádis-Baptista, Gandhi;Dodou, Hilania V;Prieto-da-Silva, Álvaro R B;Zaharenko, André J;Kazuma, Kohei;Nihei, Ken-Ichi;Inagaki, Hidetoshi;Mori-Yasumoto, Kanami;Konno, Katsuhiro;
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Chemical LTD, but not LTP, induces transient accumulation of gelsolin in dendritic spines.
Hlushchenko, Iryna;Hotulainen, Pirta;
Vol. 400 , No. 9 , pp. 1129-1139
317 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cysteine, glutathione and a new genetic code: biochemical adaptations of the primordial cells to spread into the open water and survive biospheric oxygenation.
Moosmann, Bernd;Schindeldecker, Mario;Hajieva, Parvana;
308 views DOI Abstract
2016
a discourse analysis through corpus linguistics on the case of popular science book the grand design
;Rosita Masfirotul Uyun
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 81-94
251 views DOI Abstract
2009
oral english proficiency: obstacles and solution for university students on muhammadiyah university of surakarta
;Muamaroh Muamaroh
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
248 views DOI Abstract
2017
simbolisme dalam tradisi lisan pasang rikajang: tinjauan semiotik
;Basrah Gising
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 139-148
234 views DOI Abstract
2017
material design to improve students’ communicative competence : textbook analysis on i can do it english for senior high school students grade xi
;Sri Anjani Putra
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 120-127
232 views DOI Abstract
2017
peningkatan kemampuan menuangkan gagasan dalam menulis melalui model exel
;- Sumarno
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 146-163
226 views DOI Abstract
2015
perilaku verbal wanita jawa dalam interaksi sosial di pasar tradisional di daerah istimewa yogyakarta
;. Zamzani;Tadkiroatun Musfiroh;. Prihadi
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 12-24
222 views DOI Abstract
View All 35 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.