medicine and science in sports and exercise | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1417 / 33,934
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated vor 4 Tagen

medicine and science in sports and exercise

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexierungen
ncbi ulakbim sci
Kurzname med sci sports exerc
Abgekürzter Name med sci sports exerc
ISSN 1530-0315
Ziel und Umfang
URL http://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/pages/default.aspx
Autorenhinweise

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (95 total)

2007
American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and fluid replacement
;Sawka MN;Burke LM;Eichner ER;Maughan RJ;Montain SJ;Stachenfeld NS;;
Vol. 39 , No. 2 , pp. -
2,013 views Abstract
2011
labor dystocia as first presentation of pelvic malignancy
;Dennis van Hamont;Petra L. M. Zusterzeel
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
652 views DOI Abstract
2018
Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in People with Spinal Cord Injury.
Bochkezanian, Vanesa;Newton, Robert U;Trajano, Gabriel S;Blazevich, Anthony J;
Vol. 50 , No. 9 , pp. 1733-1739
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Foot Angle and Loading Rate during Running Demonstrate a Nonlinear Relationship.
Stiffler-Joachim, Mikel R;Wille, Christa M;Kliethermes, Stephanie A;Johnston, William;Heiderscheit, Bryan C;
Vol. 51 , No. 10 , pp. 2067-2072
404 views DOI Abstract
2015
Decline in cardiorespiratory fitness and odds of incident sleep complaints
Dishman RK;Sui X;Church TS;Kline CE;Youngstedt SD;Blair SN;;
Vol. 47 , No. 5 , pp. -
401 views Abstract
2013
Temporal relationships between physical activity and sleep in older women
Lambiase MJ;Gabriel KP;Kuller LH;Matthews KA;;
Vol. 45 , No. 12 , pp. -
389 views Abstract
2016
No Evidence of Reciprocal Associations between Daily Sleep and Physical Activity
Mitchell JA;Godbole S;Moran K;Murray K;James P;Laden F;Hipp JA;Kerr J;Glanz K;;
Vol. 48 , No. 10 , pp. -
384 views Abstract
2019
MICT or HIIT ± RT Programs for Altering Body Composition in Postmenopausal Women.
Dupuit, Marine;Rance, Mélanie;Morel, Claire;Bouillon, Patrice;Pereira, Bruno;Bonnet, Alban;Maillard, Florie;Duclos, Martine;Boisseau, Nathalie;
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
Increasing Students' Activity in Physical Education: Results of the SELF-FIT Trial.
Ha, Amy S;Lonsdale, Chris;Lubans, David R;Ng, Johan Y Y;
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Endurance Exercise Attenuates Doxorubicin-induced Cardiotoxicity.
Lee, Youngil;Kwon, Insu;Jang, Yongchul;Cosio-Lima, Ludmila;Barrington, Patricia;
336 views DOI Abstract
View All 95 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.