the journal of urology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6978 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

the journal of urology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name j urol
Abbreviated Name j urol
ISSN 1527-3792
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2019
Renal Cancer Surgery in Patients without Preexisting Chronic Kidney Disease-Is There a Survival Benefit for Partial Nephrectomy?
Suk-Ouichai, Chalairat;Tanaka, Hajime;Wang, Yanbo;Wu, Jitao;Ye, Yunlin;Demirjian, Sevag;Li, Jianbo;Campbell, Steven C;
Vol. 201 , No. 6 , pp. 1088-1096
509 views DOI Abstract
2017
Health Care Integration and Quality among Men with Prostate Cancer.
Herrel, Lindsey A;Kaufman, Samuel R;Yan, Phyllis;Miller, David C;Schroeck, Florian R;Skolarus, Ted A;Shahinian, Vahakn B;Hollenbeck, Brent K;
Vol. 197 , No. 1 , pp. 55-60
443 views DOI Abstract
2019
Re: Characterisation of Human Urethral Rupture Thresholds for Urinary Catheter Inflation Related Injuries.
Elliott, Sean;
, pp. 101097JU000000000000068702
388 views DOI
2019
Added Value of Concomitant Systematic Biopsies for Grade Group Prediction Based on Radical Prostatectomy Final Pathology in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Positive Cases Undergoing Fusion Targeted Biopsies.
Ploussard, Guillaume;Beauval, Jean-Baptiste;Lesourd, Marine;Almeras, Christophe;Assoun, Jacques;Aziza, Richard;Gautier, Jean-Romain;Loison, Guillaume;Portalez, Daniel;Salin, Ambroise;Tollon, Christophe;Soulié, Michel;Malavaud, Bernard;Roumiguié, Mathieu;
, pp. 101097JU0000000000000418
369 views DOI Abstract
2020
Cardiovascular Risk in Men with Prostate Cancer: Insights from the RADICAL PC Study.
Leong, Darryl P;Fradet, Vincent;Shayegan, Bobby;Duceppe, Emmanuelle;Siemens, Robert;Niazi, Tamim;Klotz, Laurence;Brown, Ian;Chin, Joseph;Lavallee, Luke;Mousavi, Negareh;Luke, Patrick;Lukka, Himu;Gopaul, Darin;Violette, Philippe;Hamilton, Rob J;Davis, Margot K;Karampatos, Sarah;Mian, Rajibul;Delouya, Guila;Fradet, Yves;Mukherjee, Som;Conen, David;Chen-Tournoux, Annabel;Johnson, Christopher;Bessissow, Amal;Dresser, George;Hameed, Adnan Kazi;Abdel-Qadir, Husam;Sener, Alp;Pal, Raveen;Devereaux, P J;Pinthus, Jehonathan;, ;
, pp. 101097JU0000000000000714
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Donor Willingness to Accept Selling a Kidney for Transplantation: Evidence from Iran.
Feizi, Mehdi;Moeindarbari, Tannaz;
Vol. 201 , No. 2 , pp. 235-236
353 views DOI
1997
Genetic evidence supporting the fecal-perineal-urethral hypothesis in cystitis caused by Escherichia coli
Yamamoto S;Tsukamoto T;Terai A;Kurazono H;Takeda Y;Yoshida O;;
Vol. 157 , No. 3 , pp. -
337 views Abstract
2016
Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction in Elementary School Children: Results of a Cross-Sectional Teacher Survey.
Ko, Lauren N;Chuang, Kai-wen;Champeau, Angelique;Allen, I Elaine;Copp, Hillary L;
Vol. 195 , No. 4 Pt 2 , pp. 1232-8
294 views DOI Abstract
2020
Development of Treatments for Localized Prostate Cancer in Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance: U.S. Food and Drug Administration Oncology Center of Excellence Public Workshop
Weinstock, C.
Vol. 203 , pp. 115-119
281 views DOI
2020
Re: Safety and Outcomes of New Generation Hormone-Therapy in Elderly Chemotherapy-Naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients in the Real World
Griebling, T.
Vol. 203 , pp. 230
278 views DOI
View All 18 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.