Indexed in Journament

food science and technology

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,158 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
21 Articles
Scores higher than 82.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name food science and technology
Abbreviated Name food science and technology

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.2
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.7
Content Distribution 76.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for food science and technology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.2 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 10.7 7.8
Content Distribution 76.4 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

0000
Drying and colour characteristics of Cleome gynandra L. (spider plant) leaves
, pp. -
636 views Abstract
2020
using real-time online preprocessed mouse tracking for lower storage and transmission costs
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1-22
559 views DOI Abstract
2016
Stability of gluten free sweet biscuit elaborated with rice bran, broken rice and okara
, pp. -
488 views Abstract
1997
NOVAS APLICAÇÕES DE SISTEMAS SFE "HOME MADE": III. ENERGIA QUÍMICA E ELÉTRICA
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 423-
466 views Abstract
2013
Quality of royal jelly produced by Africanized honeybees fed a supplemented diet
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 304-309
461 views Abstract
2016
Physicochemical characteristics and sensory acceptability of ready-to-eat sliced frozen roast beef with partial reduction of sodium chloride
, pp. -
445 views Abstract
2000
Teores de tiamina, riboflavina e piridoxina em leites bovinos comercializados na cidade de São Paulo
Vol. 20 , No. 3 , pp. 291-298
439 views Abstract
2003
Influência da concentração e da proporção fruto: xarope na desidratação osmótica de bananas processadas Influence of concentration and proportion fruit: syrup in the osmotic dehydration of processed bananas
Vol. 23 , pp. 126-130
431 views Abstract
2003
Secagem de café cereja descascado por ar quente e microondas Drying pulped coffee cherry beans by means of hot air ond microwaves
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 381-385
407 views Abstract
2020
using real-time online preprocessed mouse tracking for lower storage and transmission costs
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1-22
559 views DOI Abstract
2017
Storage stability of standard and diet figs canned in syrup
Vol. 37 , pp. 154-159
142 views DOI
2016
Stability of gluten free sweet biscuit elaborated with rice bran, broken rice and okara
, pp. -
488 views Abstract
2016
Physicochemical characteristics and sensory acceptability of ready-to-eat sliced frozen roast beef with partial reduction of sodium chloride
, pp. -
445 views Abstract
2013
Heat-treatment reduces anti-nutritional phytochemicals and maintains protein quality in genetically improved hulled soybean flour
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 310-315
246 views Abstract
2013
Fusarium graminearum growth inhibition mechanism using phenolic compounds from Spirulina sp Mecanismo de inibição de Fusarium graminearum por compostos fenólicos extraídos de Spirulina sp
Vol. 33 , pp. 75-80
315 views Abstract
2013
Quality of royal jelly produced by Africanized honeybees fed a supplemented diet
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 304-309
461 views Abstract
2013
In-house method validation and occurrence of alpha-, beta-endosulfan, endosulfan sulphate, lambda-cyhalothrin, procymidone and trifluralin residues in strawberry
Vol. 33 , No. 4 , pp. 765-775
290 views Abstract
2012
Postharvest technologies for mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.) conservation
Vol. 32 , No. 4 , pp. 668-672
282 views Abstract
2012
Chemical, biochemical, and microbiological aspects of chitosan quaternary salt as active coating on sliced apples
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 599-605
256 views Abstract
Journament Score
38.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,158 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

76.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.