Indexed in Journament

International journal of food microbiology

ISSN 0168-1605· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #19,086 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
417 Articles
Scores higher than 34.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Int J Food Microbiol
Abbreviated Name int j food microbiol
ISSN 0168-1605
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-food-microbiology

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for International journal of food microbiology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 20.0 19.2
Diversity 37.0 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.7 13.4
Content Distribution 37.9 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (417)

2020
Inactivation by osmotic dehydration and air drying of Salmonella, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, hepatitis A virus and selected surrogates on blueberries.
Vol. 320 , pp. 108522
571 views DOI Abstract
2019
Detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in beef products using droplet digital PCR.
Vol. 319 , pp. 108499
485 views DOI Abstract
2007
The in vitro antibacterial activity of dietary spice and medicinal herb extracts
Vol. 117 , No. 1 , pp. 112-119
484 views
2008
Tunisian Salvia officinalis L. and Schinus molle L. essential oils: Their chemical compositions and their preservative effects against Salmonella inoculated in minced beef meat
Vol. 125 , No. 3 , pp. 242-251
461 views
2008
Risk profiles of pork and poultry meat and risk ratings of various pathogen/product combinations.
Vol. 126 , No. 1-2 , pp. 1-12
439 views DOI Abstract
2011
Use of a multivariate approach to assess the incidence of Alicyclobacillus spp. in concentrate fruit juices marketed in Argentina: results of a 14-year survey.
Vol. 151 , No. 2 , pp. 229-34
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of Spanish smoked paprika "Pimentón de La Vera" on control of ochratoxin A and aflatoxins production on a dry-cured meat model system.
Vol. 308 , pp. 108303
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nutritional and functional effects of the lactic acid bacteria fermentation on gelatinized legume flours.
Vol. 316 , pp. 108426
373 views DOI Abstract
2021
A stochastic approach for modelling the effects of temperature on the growth rate of Bacillus cereus sensu lato
Vol. 349 , pp. -
321 views Abstract
2020
Broad range of substrate specificities in papain and fig latex enzymes preparations improve enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.
Vol. 334 , pp. 108851
345 views DOI Abstract
2020
Comparing thermal inactivation to a combined process of moderate heat and high pressure: Effect on ascospores in strawberry puree.
Vol. 325 , pp. 108629
248 views DOI Abstract
2020
Comparison of the antifungal effect of undissociated lactic and acetic acid in sourdough bread and in chemically acidified wheat bread.
Vol. 321 , pp. 108551
322 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #19,086 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

32.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

37.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

37.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.