Indexed in Journament

Tobacco control

ISSN 1468-3318· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,847 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
40 Articles
Scores higher than 56.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Tob Control
Abbreviated Name tob control
ISSN 1468-3318

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 20.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.7
Content Distribution 75.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility — 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 20.0 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 10.7 7.8
Content Distribution 75.1 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (40)

2019
Content analysis of tobacco in episodic programming popular among youth and young adults.
Rath, Jessica Miller;Bennett, Morgane;Vallone, Donna;Hair, Elizabeth C;
447 views DOI Abstract
2017
Costs, revenues and profits: an economic analysis of smallholder tobacco farmer livelihoods in Malawi.
Makoka, Donald;Drope, Jeffrey;Appau, Adriana;Labonte, Ronald;Li, Qing;Goma, Fastone;Zulu, Richard;Magati, Peter;Lencucha, Raphael;
Vol. 26 , No. 6 , pp. 634-640
447 views DOI Abstract
2019
New Zealand tobacco retailers' understandings of and attitudes towards selling Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: a qualitative exploration.
Bateman, Jerram;Robertson, Lindsay;Marsh, Louise;Thornley, Louise;Hoek, Janet;
393 views DOI Abstract
2019
Characterising KandyPens-related posts to Instagram: implications for nicotine and cannabis use.
Majmundar, Anuja;Kirkpatrick, Matthew;Cruz, Tess Boley;Unger, Jennifer B;Allem, Jon-Patrick;
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Inequities in tobacco advertising exposure among young adult sexual, racial and ethnic minorities: examining intersectionality of sexual orientation with race and ethnicity.
Tan, Andy S L;Hanby, Elaine P;Sanders-Jackson, Ashley;Lee, Stella;Viswanath, Kasisomayajula;Potter, Jennifer;
385 views DOI Abstract
2020
'It has candy. You need to press on it': young adults' perceptions of flavoured cigarettes in the Philippines.
Brown, Jennifer;Zhu, Meng;Moran, Meghan;Hoe, Connie;Frejas, Ferdie;Cohen, Joanna E;
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Compliance of e-cigarette refill liquids with regulations on labelling, packaging and technical design characteristics in nine European member states.
Girvalaki, Charis;Vardavas, Alexander;Tzatzarakis, Manolis;Kyriakos, Christina N;Nikitara, Katerina;Tsatsakis, Aristidis M;Vardavas, Constantine I;
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Tracking and tracing the tobacco industry: potential tobacco industry influence over the EU's system for tobacco traceability and security features.
Gallagher, Allen William Andrew;Gilmore, Anna B;Eads, Michael;
371 views DOI Abstract
2020
Tobacco imagery in on-demand streaming content popular among adolescents and young adults in India: implications for global tobacco control.
Arora, Monika;Nazar, Gaurang P;Chugh, Aastha;Rawal, Tina;Shrivastava, Surbhi;Sinha, Praveen;Munish, Vineet Gill;Tullu, Fikru Tesfaye;Schotte, Kerstin;Polansky, Jonathan R;Glantz, Stanton;
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evolving IQOS packaging designs change perceptions of product appeal, uniqueness, quality and safety: a randomised experiment, 2018, USA.
Lee, Joseph G L;Blanchflower, Tiffany M;O'Brien, Kevin F;Averett, Paige E;Cofie, Leslie E;Gregory, Kyle R;
Vol. 28 , No. e1 , pp. e52-e55
350 views DOI Abstract
2020
Tobacco imagery in on-demand streaming content popular among adolescents and young adults in India: implications for global tobacco control.
Arora, Monika;Nazar, Gaurang P;Chugh, Aastha;Rawal, Tina;Shrivastava, Surbhi;Sinha, Praveen;Munish, Vineet Gill;Tullu, Fikru Tesfaye;Schotte, Kerstin;Polansky, Jonathan R;Glantz, Stanton;
370 views DOI Abstract
2020
'It has candy. You need to press on it': young adults' perceptions of flavoured cigarettes in the Philippines.
Brown, Jennifer;Zhu, Meng;Moran, Meghan;Hoe, Connie;Frejas, Ferdie;Cohen, Joanna E;
381 views DOI Abstract
2020
Why Tasmanian retailers stop selling tobacco and implications for tobacco control.
Melody, Shannon M;Martin-Gall, Veronica A;Veitch, Mark G;
237 views DOI Abstract
2020
E-cigarette advertising expenditures in the United States, 2014-2018.
Ali, Fatma Romeh M;Marynak, Kristy L;Kim, Yoonsang;Binns, Steven;Emery, Sherry L;Gomez, Yessica;King, Brian A;
278 views DOI Abstract
2020
PhenX: Vector measures for tobacco regulatory research.
Ribisl, Kurt M;Chaloupka, Frank J;Kirchner, Thomas R;Henriksen, Lisa;Nettles, Destiney S;Geisler, Rebecca C;Hendershot, Tabitha P;Swan, Gary E;, ;
Vol. 29 , No. Suppl 1 , pp. s27-s34
301 views DOI Abstract
2019
Foreword by the Secretariat of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.
da Costa E Silva, Vera Luiza;
Vol. 28 , No. Suppl 2 , pp. s79-s80
298 views DOI
2019
Impact of a ban on the open display of tobacco products in retail outlets on never smoking youth in the UK: findings from a repeat cross-sectional survey before, during and after implementation.
Ford, Allison;MacKintosh, Anne Marie;Moodie, Crawford;Kuipers, Mirte A G;Hastings, Gerard B;Bauld, Linda;
310 views DOI Abstract
2019
Characterising KandyPens-related posts to Instagram: implications for nicotine and cannabis use.
Majmundar, Anuja;Kirkpatrick, Matthew;Cruz, Tess Boley;Unger, Jennifer B;Allem, Jon-Patrick;
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evolving IQOS packaging designs change perceptions of product appeal, uniqueness, quality and safety: a randomised experiment, 2018, USA.
Lee, Joseph G L;Blanchflower, Tiffany M;O'Brien, Kevin F;Averett, Paige E;Cofie, Leslie E;Gregory, Kyle R;
Vol. 28 , No. e1 , pp. e52-e55
350 views DOI Abstract
2019
From glass boxes to social media engagement: An audit of tobacco retail marketing in Indonesia
Astuti, P.
Vol. 28 , pp. E133-E140
163 views DOI
Journament Score
35.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,847 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

20.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.