Indexed in Journament

malaria journal

ISSN 1475-2875· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,964 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
128 Articles
Scores higher than 35.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name malar j
Abbreviated Name malaria journal
ISSN 1475-2875
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/12936

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for malaria journal
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 20.0 19.2
Diversity 11.1 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.0 13.4
Content Distribution 67.0 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (128)

2011
Knowledge and behaviour as determinants of anti-malarial drug use in a peri-urban population from malaria holoendemic region of western Kenya
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 99-
899 views Abstract
2007
Assessing malaria control in the Kassena-Nankana district of northern Ghana through repeated surveys using the RBM tools
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 103-
736 views Abstract
2013
Plasma cytokines, chemokines and cellular immune responses in pre-school Nigerian children infected with <it>Plasmodium falciparum</it>
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 5-
724 views Abstract
2018
Comparison of three diagnostic methods (microscopy, RDT, and PCR) for the detection of malaria parasites in representative samples from Equatorial Guinea
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
702 views Abstract
2011
Exposure to anti-malarial drugs and monitoring of adverse drug reactions using toll-free mobile phone calls in private retail sector in Sagamu, Nigeria: implications for pharmacovigilance
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 230-
618 views Abstract
2011
Target product profile choices for intra-domiciliary malaria vector control pesticide products: repel or kill?
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 207-
618 views Abstract
2011
The initial pharmaceutical development of an artesunate/amodiaquine oral formulation for the treatment of malaria: a public-private partnership
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 142-
587 views Abstract
2009
Malaria is associated with poor school performance in an endemic area of the Brazilian Amazon
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 230-
583 views Abstract
2008
Predicting Global Fund grant disbursements for procurement of artemisinin-based combination therapies
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 200-
582 views Abstract
2012
Malaria resurgence: a systematic review and assessment of its causes
569 views DOI
2020
Shifting transmission risk for malaria in Africa with climate change: a framework for planning and intervention.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 170
325 views DOI Abstract
2020
Childhood malaria case incidence in Malawi between 2004 and 2017: spatio-temporal modelling of climate and non-climate factors.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 5
347 views DOI Abstract
2020
Willingness-to-pay for long-lasting insecticide-treated bed nets: a discrete choice experiment with real payment in Ghana.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 14
462 views DOI Abstract
2019
The effect of ivermectin ® on fertility, fecundity and mortality of Anopheles arabiensis fed on treated men in Ethiopia
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
214 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effectiveness of plant-based repellents against different Anopheles species: a systematic review.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 436
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Indigenously developed digital handheld Android-based Geographic Information System (GIS)-tagged tablets (TABs) in malaria elimination programme in Mangaluru city, Karnataka, India.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 444
419 views DOI Abstract
2019
Understanding the gap between access and use: a qualitative study on barriers and facilitators to insecticide-treated net use in Ghana.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 417
414 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,964 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

32.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

67.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.