Indexed in Journament

Cancer medicine

ISSN 2045-7634· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
46.8 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #257 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
22 Articles
Scores higher than 99.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Cancer Med
Abbreviated Name cancer med
ISSN 2045-7634

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 60.0
Diversity 38.9
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.0
Content Distribution 69.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Cancer medicine
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.4
Timeliness 60.0 5.8
Diversity 38.9 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 10.0 5.8
Content Distribution 69.4 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (22)

2021
Perspectives, fears and expectations of patients with gynaecological cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A Pan-European study of the European Network of Gynaecological Cancer Advocacy Groups (ENGAGe)
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. -
447 views Abstract
2019
Comprehensive analysis of five long noncoding RNAs expression as competing endogenous RNAs in regulating hepatoma carcinoma.
Vol. 8 , No. 12 , pp. 5735-5749
425 views DOI Abstract
2017
Diffusion of digital breast tomosynthesis among women in primary care: associations with insurance type.
Vol. 6 , No. 5 , pp. 1102-1107
372 views DOI Abstract
2020
Detection of AXL expression in circulating tumor cells of lung cancer patients using an automated microcavity array system.
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Adding hydroxyurea in combination with ruxolitinib improves clinical responses in hyperproliferative forms of myelofibrosis.
Vol. 8 , No. 6 , pp. 2802-2809
351 views DOI Abstract
2020
Biological subtype predicts locoregional recurrence after postmastectomy radiotherapy in Chinese breast cancer patients.
337 views DOI Abstract
2019
RAPTOR promotes colorectal cancer proliferation by inducing mTORC1 and upregulating ribosome assembly factor URB1.
330 views DOI Abstract
2019
miR-124-3p availability is antagonized by LncRNA-MALAT1 for Slug-induced tumor metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma.
326 views DOI Abstract
2025
Predictors of Financial Toxicity Trajectories in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: A Latent Class Growth Analysis.
Vol. 14 , pp. e70875
127 views DOI Abstract
2025
Evaluation of Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy for Cervical Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary.
Vol. 14 , pp. e70869
105 views DOI Abstract
2025
Gut Microbiota and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Metabolic Products and Immunotherapy Modulation.
Vol. 14 , pp. e70914
58 views DOI Abstract
2023
Gene silencing of Helicobacter pylori through newly designed siRNA convenes the treatment of gastric cancer.
Vol. 12 , No. 24 , pp. 22407-22419
74 views DOI Abstract
2021
Perspectives, fears and expectations of patients with gynaecological cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A Pan-European study of the European Network of Gynaecological Cancer Advocacy Groups (ENGAGe)
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. -
447 views Abstract
2020
Risk prediction model for lung cancer incorporating metabolic markers: Development and internal validation in a Chinese population.
312 views DOI Abstract
2020
The case for philanthropic investment to increase colorectal cancer screening rates: A novel paradigm to address a public health challenge.
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 1220-1229
282 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
46.8/100 · Below Average
Ranked #257 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

46.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

38.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.