Indexed in Journament

jpma the journal of the pakistan medical association

ISSN 0030-9982· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #19,471 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
67 Articles
Scores higher than 33.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j pak med assoc
Abbreviated Name j pak med assoc
ISSN 0030-9982
URL http://www.jpma.org.pk/index.php

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.0
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.0
Content Distribution 59.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for jpma the journal of the pakistan medical association
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.0 13.4
Content Distribution 59.0 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (67)

2019
Sacral insufficiency fracture, a rare complication of posterior spinal instrumentation.
Vol. 69 , No. 9 , pp. 1380-1382
449 views Abstract
1994
Recurrent late onset post-traumatic meningitis
Vol. 44 , No. 8 , pp. -
403 views Abstract
2010
2009
Post mastectomy adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer: a comparision of three hypofractionated protocols.
Vol. 59 , No. 5 , pp. 282-7
387 views Abstract
2019
Individual innovativeness features of family health personnels and their attitudes towards technology.
Vol. 69 , No. 8 , pp. 1079-1083
355 views Abstract
2018
Role modelling: A missing link in medical education1554
Vol. 68 , No. 11 , pp. -
353 views Abstract
2013
Occupational injuries admitted to the emergency department.
Vol. 63 , No. 2 , pp. 179-84
342 views Abstract
2014
Prevalence of albicans and non-albicans candiduria in a Malaysian medical centre.
Vol. 64 , No. 12 , pp. 1375-9
337 views Abstract
2019
Nurse prescribing: Attitudes of medical doctors towards expanding professional competencies of nurses and midwives.
Vol. 69 , No. 8 , pp. 1199-1204
320 views Abstract
2020
Obesity related lung complications and a possible phytochemical therapeutic solution.
Vol. 70 , No. 9 , pp. 1616-1619
74 views Abstract
2020
Multiple cranial nerve injury in Ramsay Hunt Syndrome: a case report.
Vol. 70 , No. 3 , pp. 537-538
195 views DOI Abstract
2020
Pandemics of the past: A narrative review.
Vol. 70(Suppl 3) , No. 5 , pp. S34-S37
205 views DOI Abstract
2020
Study of depression in university students in Pakistan.
Vol. 70 , No. 4 , pp. 650-654
131 views DOI Abstract
2020
Compliance of hand written transfusion requisition form and improvement after online request - a clinical audit.
Vol. 70 , No. 4 , pp. 694-698
193 views DOI Abstract
2020
Diagnosis of inherited metabolic disorders by selective metabolite testing: three years' experience at a tertiary care center in Rawalpindi.
Vol. 70 , No. 1 , pp. 53-57
220 views DOI Abstract
2020
2020
Functional and clinical outcomes of open versus closed radius and ulna shaft fractures in adults: A prospective cohort study.
Vol. 70(Suppl 1) , No. 2 , pp. S24-S26
240 views Abstract
2020
Non-operative treatment of hepatic trauma: A changing paradigm. A Six year review of liver trauma patient in a single institute.
Vol. 70(Suppl 1) , No. 2 , pp. S27-S32
156 views Abstract
Journament Score
32.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #19,471 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

32.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

59.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.