molbank | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1058 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

molbank

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name molbank
Abbreviated Name molbank
ISSN 1422-8599
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.mdpi.com/journal/molbank
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2012
a hybrid approach using ism for leveling agile criteria and fuzzy ahp to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and fuzzy topsis to rank the alternatives
;Mahdi Karbasian1;Aazam Khabushani;mohamad javanmardi;Mahmood Zanjirchi
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 107-134
350 views Abstract
2019
<i>N</i>-Benzo[<i>c</i>][1,2,5]thiazol-4-yl-3-trifluoromethylbenzamide
Mamari, Hamad H. Al;Awaimri, Nasser Al;Lawati, Yousuf Al;
Vol. 2019 , No. 3 , pp. M1075-
344 views Abstract
2012
prioritizing improvable human capital processes in esfahan oil refinery company based on pcf and by ipa approach
;Reza Behmanesh;yahya Zare.M;M.saleh Owlia
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 41-68
323 views Abstract
2012
parameter estimation for improving association indicators in binary logistic regression
;Mahdi Bashiri;Reza Kamranrad
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 135-154
319 views Abstract
2008
One-pot Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of 1H-Phenanthro[9,10- d][1,2,3]triazole
Faraji, Mehrak;Taherpour, Avat Arman;
Vol. 2008 , No. 3 , pp. M577-
306 views Abstract
2012
analysis of quality of ....
;Gholamreza Bordbar;Fatemah Shakeri
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 101-120
288 views Abstract
2014
weighting performance evaluation criteria base in balanced score card approach with use of combination method shapley value & bull\'s-eye
;Mohammad Hassan Kamfiroozi;Meysam Jafari-Eskandari;Alireza Aliahmadi;Nayyer Ferdosi
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 113-124
263 views Abstract
2019
3-{[(2,3-dichlorophenyl)amino]methyl}-5-(furan-2-ylmethylidene)-1,3-thiazolidine-2,4-dione
Uwabagira, N.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 0-0
262 views DOI
2015
project scheduling with fuzzy number using simulated annealing algorithm
;Hamzeh Daneshpayeh;Hossein-Ali Hassan-Pour;Mohamad Amirkhan
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 74-67
255 views Abstract
2011
2,3-Diaminophenazine
Fu, Shiyu;Zhan, Huaiyu;Chen, Shicheng;Lucia, Lucian;Zhou, Pandeng;Liu, Hao;
Vol. 2011 , No. 3 , pp. M730-
249 views Abstract
View All 20 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.