Indexed in Journament

molbank

ISSN 1422-8599· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.3/100
Journament Score
#3,150
Journament Rank
20
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name molbank
Abbreviated Name molbank
ISSN 1422-8599
URL http://www.mdpi.com/journal/molbank

Indexings

scopus doaj

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (20)

2012
a hybrid approach using ism for leveling agile criteria and fuzzy ahp to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and fuzzy topsis to rank the alternatives
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 107-134
363 views Abstract
2019
<i>N</i>-Benzo[<i>c</i>][1,2,5]thiazol-4-yl-3-trifluoromethylbenzamide
Vol. 2019 , No. 3 , pp. M1075-
357 views Abstract
2012
prioritizing improvable human capital processes in esfahan oil refinery company based on pcf and by ipa approach
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 41-68
342 views Abstract
2012
parameter estimation for improving association indicators in binary logistic regression
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 135-154
337 views Abstract
2008
One-pot Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of 1H-Phenanthro[9,10- d][1,2,3]triazole
Vol. 2008 , No. 3 , pp. M577-
326 views Abstract
2012
analysis of quality of ....
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 101-120
303 views Abstract
2014
weighting performance evaluation criteria base in balanced score card approach with use of combination method shapley value & bull\'s-eye
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 113-124
281 views Abstract
2015
project scheduling with fuzzy number using simulated annealing algorithm
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 74-67
267 views Abstract
2011
2,3-Diaminophenazine
Vol. 2011 , No. 3 , pp. M730-
265 views Abstract
2019
<i>N</i>-Benzo[<i>c</i>][1,2,5]thiazol-4-yl-3-trifluoromethylbenzamide
Vol. 2019 , No. 3 , pp. M1075-
357 views Abstract
2017
university course timetabling using constraint programming
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 119-138
95 views Abstract
2016
reactive scheduling presentation for an open shop problem focused on job\\\'s due dates
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 95-112
224 views Abstract
2015
developing a supply chain planning model for perishable crops
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 35-60
202 views Abstract
2015
project scheduling with fuzzy number using simulated annealing algorithm
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 74-67
267 views Abstract
2015
a single period multi objective mathematical model for portfolio
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 92-75
117 views Abstract
2015
a new method to calculate internal rate of return
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 113-126
223 views Abstract
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

42.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.