Indexed in Journament

Spine

ISSN 1528-1159· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.3/100
Journament Score
#8,566
Journament Rank
16
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Abbreviated Name spine
ISSN 1528-1159

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2019
Rib Hyperostosis as a Risk Factor for Poor Prognosis in Cervical Spine Injury Patients with Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis.
370 views DOI Abstract
2017
Stand-alone Lateral Recess Decompression Without Discectomy in Patients Presenting With Claudicant Radicular Pain and MRI Evidence of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Prospective Study.
Vol. 42 , No. 13 , pp. 984-991
348 views DOI Abstract
2013
Radiographical texture analysis improves the prediction of vertebral fracture: an ex vivo biomechanical study.
Vol. 38 , No. 21 , pp. E1320-6
347 views DOI Abstract
2019
Health-Related Quality of Life in Non-Operated Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in the Middle Years: a Mean 25-Year Follow-up Study.
345 views DOI Abstract
2020
Chronic Opioid Use is Associated with Surgical Site Infection after Lumbar Fusion.
341 views DOI Abstract
2015
The rate of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with spinal cord stimulation.
Vol. 40 , No. 9 , pp. E531-7
333 views DOI Abstract
2020
Profile of Patients With Acute Low Back Pain Who Sought Emergency Departments: A Cross-sectional Study.
Vol. 45 , No. 5 , pp. E296-E303
331 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Titanium-Coated PEEK Cage Maintains Better Bone Fusion with the Endplate than the PEEK Cage 6 Months After PLIF Surgery-A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study.
327 views DOI Abstract
2020
Postoperative Single-shot Epidural Fentanyl and Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia After Lumbar Decompression: A Prospective, Double-blind Randomized Study.
Vol. 45 , No. 15 , pp. 1017-1023
308 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bladder Scans and Postvoid Residual Volume Measurement Improve Diagnostic Accuracy of Cauda Equina Syndrome.
Vol. 44 , No. 18 , pp. 1303-1308
308 views DOI Abstract
2024
Pulmonary Function at Minimum 10 Years After Segmental Pedicle Screw Instrumentation for Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
75 views DOI Abstract
2020
Postoperative Single-shot Epidural Fentanyl and Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia After Lumbar Decompression: A Prospective, Double-blind Randomized Study.
Vol. 45 , No. 15 , pp. 1017-1023
308 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Titanium-Coated PEEK Cage Maintains Better Bone Fusion with the Endplate than the PEEK Cage 6 Months After PLIF Surgery-A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study.
327 views DOI Abstract
2020
New Onset Depression and Anxiety After Spinal Fusion Surgery: Incidence and Risk Factors.
195 views DOI Abstract
2020
Profile of Patients With Acute Low Back Pain Who Sought Emergency Departments: A Cross-sectional Study.
Vol. 45 , No. 5 , pp. E296-E303
331 views DOI Abstract
2020
Chronic Opioid Use is Associated with Surgical Site Infection after Lumbar Fusion.
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rib Hyperostosis as a Risk Factor for Poor Prognosis in Cervical Spine Injury Patients with Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis.
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bladder Scans and Postvoid Residual Volume Measurement Improve Diagnostic Accuracy of Cauda Equina Syndrome.
Vol. 44 , No. 18 , pp. 1303-1308
308 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.