Digestive diseases and sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6365 / 33,987
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 minggu yang lalu

Digestive diseases and sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Pengindeksan
ncbi ulakbim sci
Nama Singkat Dig Dis Sci
Nama Singkatan dig dis sci
ISSN 1573-2568
Tujuan dan Ruang Lingkup
URL
Petunjuk untuk Penulis

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

1970
Infectious diarrhea in patients with AIDS
Michael A. Antony;Lawrence J. Brandt;Robert S. Klein;Leslie H. Bernstein;Michael A. Antony;Lawrence J. Brandt;Robert S. Klein;Leslie H. Bernstein;
Vol. 33 , No. 9 , pp. 1141-1146
492 views DOI Abstract
1970
Intestinal mucosal inflammation associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection
Donald P. Kotler;Safak Reka;Frederic Clayton;Donald P. Kotler;Safak Reka;Frederic Clayton;
Vol. 38 , No. 6 , pp. 1119-1127
421 views DOI Abstract
1993
Intestinal mucosal inflammation associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection
Kotler DP;Reka S;Clayton F;;
Vol. 38 , No. 6 , pp. -
384 views Abstract
2004
Relationship between fecal calprotectin, intestinal inflammation, and peripheral blood neutrophils in patients with active ulcerative colitis
Hanai H;Takeuchi K;Iida T;Kashiwagi N;Saniabadi AR;Matsushita I;Sato Y;Kasuga N;Nakamura T;;
Vol. 49 , No. 9 , pp. -
382 views Abstract
2007
A systematic review of provider knowledge of hepatitis C: is it enough for a complex disease?
Zickmund SL;Brown KE;Bielefeldt K;;
Vol. 52 , No. 10 , pp. -
369 views Abstract
2007
A Systematic Review of Provider Knowledge of Hepatitis C: Is it Enough for a Complex Disease?
Susan L. Zickmund;Kyle E. Brown;Klaus Bielefeldt;Susan L. Zickmund;Kyle E. Brown;Klaus Bielefeldt;
Vol. 52 , No. 10 , pp. 2550-2556
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multidirectional Colonoscopy Quality Improvement Increases Adenoma Detection Rate: Results of the Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center Colonoscopy Quality Upgrade Project (Gangnam-CUP).
Seo, Ji Yeon;Jin, Eun Hyo;Bae, Jung Ho;Lim, Joo Hyun;Chung, Goh Eun;Lee, Changhyun;Kwak, Min-Sun;Kang, Hae Yeon;Song, Ji Hyun;Yang, Sun Young;Yang, Jong In;Lim, Seon Hee;Yim, Jeong Yoon;Kim, Joo Sung;Chung, Su Jin;
328 views DOI Abstract
1988
Infectious diarrhea in patients with AIDS
Antony MA;Brandt LJ;Klein RS;Bernstein LH;;
Vol. 33 , No. 9 , pp. -
326 views Abstract
2019
Locostatin Alleviates Liver Fibrosis Induced by Carbon Tetrachloride in Mice
Ma, J.
Vol. 64 , pp. 2570-2580
321 views DOI
2020
Abnormal Intestinal Microbiome in Medical Disorders and Potential Reversibility by Fecal Microbiota Transplantation.
DuPont, Herbert L;Jiang, Zhi-Dong;DuPont, Andrew W;Utay, Netanya S;
320 views DOI Abstract
View All 18 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.