Indexed in Journament

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges

ISSN 1938-808X· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.3 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #2,442 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
146 Articles
Scores higher than 91.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nombre Corto Acad Med
Nombre Abreviado acad med
ISSN 1938-808X
URL http://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/pages/default.aspx

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 20.0 9.2
Diversity 77.8 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 6.4 7.8
Content Distribution 60.0 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (146)

2020
Training Mentor-Mentee Pairs to Build a Robust Culture for Mentorship and a Pipeline of Clinical and Translational Researchers: The Colorado Mentoring Training Program.
Nearing, Kathryn A;Nuechterlein, Bridget M;Tan, Shuyuan;Zerzan, Judy T;Libby, Anne M;Austin, Gregory L;
522 views DOI Abstract
2018
Blockchain Technology: A Data Framework to Improve Validity, Trust, and Accountability of Information Exchange in Health Professions Education.
Funk, Eric;Riddell, Jeff;Ankel, Felix;Cabrera, Daniel;
Vol. 93 , No. 12 , pp. 1791-1794
490 views DOI Abstract
2018
Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Patient Experiences at a Family Medicine Clinic.
Hinrichs, Amanda;Link, Carrie;Seaquist, Lea;Ehlinger, Peek;Aldrin, Stephanie;Pratt, Rebekah;
Vol. 93 , No. 1 , pp. 76-81
488 views DOI Abstract
2014
A novel approach to supporting relationship-centered care through electronic health record ergonomic training in preclerkship medical education.
Silverman, Howard;Ho, Yun-Xian;Kaib, Susan;Ellis, Wendy Danto;Moffitt, Marícela P;Chen, Qingxia;Nian, Hui;Gadd, Cynthia S;
Vol. 89 , No. 9 , pp. 1230-4
452 views DOI Abstract
2020
Value-Based Health Care in Undergraduate Medical Education.
Holtzman, Jessica N;Deshpande, Bhushan R;Stuart, Jessica C;Feeley, Thomas W;Witkowski, Mary;Hundert, Edward M;Kasper, Jennifer;
451 views DOI Abstract
2020
Attending to the Emotional Well-Being of the Health Care Workforce in a New York City Health System During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Ripp, Jonathan;Peccoralo, Lauren;Charney, Dennis;
438 views DOI Abstract
2019
Teaching Evidence-Based Medicine to Medical Students Using Wikipedia as a Platform.
Murray, Heather;Walker, Melanie;Dawson, Jennifer;Simper, Natalie;Maggio, Lauren A;
438 views DOI Abstract
2019
Management Reasoning: Implications for Health Professions Educators and a Research Agenda.
Cook, David A;Durning, Steven J;Sherbino, Jonathan;Gruppen, Larry D;
Vol. 94 , No. 9 , pp. 1310-1316
430 views DOI Abstract
2019
Taking Students as They Should Be: Restoring Trust in Undergraduate Medical Education.
Slavin, Stuart;Smith, Gregory;
422 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exploring Validity Evidence Associated With Questionnaire-Based Tools for Assessing the Professional Performance of Physicians: A Systematic Review.
van der Meulen, Mirja W;Smirnova, Alina;Heeneman, Sylvia;Oude Egbrink, Mirjam G A;van der Vleuten, Cees P M;Lombarts, Kiki M J M H;
Vol. 94 , No. 9 , pp. 1384-1397
401 views DOI Abstract
2024
Undergraduate Medical Education Curriculum Reforms in Pakistan: A Mixed Methods Study of Academic Leadership Perspectives.
Bakhshi, Saqib Kamran;Afzal, Noreen;Merchant, Asma Altaf Hussain;Abdul Rahim, Komal;Shaikh, Namra Qadeer;Noorali, Ali Aahil;Lakhdir, Maryam Pyar Ali;Tariq, Muhammad;Haider, Adil H;
107 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Hahnemann University Hospital Closure and What Matters: A Department Chair's Perspective.
Hamilton, Richard J;
Vol. 95 , No. 4 , pp. 494-498
37 views DOI Abstract
2020
Attending to the Emotional Well-Being of the Health Care Workforce in a New York City Health System During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Ripp, Jonathan;Peccoralo, Lauren;Charney, Dennis;
438 views DOI Abstract
2020
Improving Graduate Medical Education Through Faculty Empowerment Instead of Detailed Guidelines.
van Loon, Karsten A;Scheele, Fedde;
333 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Highly Structured Physician Scientist Training Program (PSTP) for Medical Students at the University of Pittsburgh.
Steinman, Richard A;Proulx, Chelsea N;Levine, Arthur S;
369 views DOI Abstract
2020
Using a Logic Model to Design and Evaluate a Quality Improvement Leadership Course.
Rajashekara, Shruthi;Naik, Aanand D;Campbell, Claire M;Gregory, Megan E;Rosen, Tracey;Engebretson, Autumn;Godwin, Kyler M;
347 views DOI Abstract
2020
Exploring the Networking of Academic Health Science Leaders: How and Why Do They Do It?
Lieff, Susan J;Baker, Lindsay;Poost-Foroosh, Laya;Castellani, Brian;Hafferty, Fred W;Ng, Stella L;
254 views DOI Abstract
2020
Lessons to Learn From Hahnemann University Hospital's Closure.
Orlowski, Janis M;Thompson, Thalia;
202 views DOI Abstract
2020
Value-Based Health Care in Undergraduate Medical Education.
Holtzman, Jessica N;Deshpande, Bhushan R;Stuart, Jessica C;Feeley, Thomas W;Witkowski, Mary;Hundert, Edward M;Kasper, Jennifer;
451 views DOI Abstract
2020
Team-Based Learning Analytics: An Empirical Case Study.
Koh, Ying Yun Juliana;Schmidt, Henk G;Low-Beer, Naomi;Rotgans, Jerome I;
203 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
42.3/100 · Below Average
Ranked #2,442 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

77.8/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

60.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.