Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1145 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name Acad Med
Abbreviated Name acad med
ISSN 1938-808X
Aim and Scope
URL http://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/pages/default.aspx
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (146 total)

2018
Blockchain Technology: A Data Framework to Improve Validity, Trust, and Accountability of Information Exchange in Health Professions Education.
Funk, Eric;Riddell, Jeff;Ankel, Felix;Cabrera, Daniel;
Vol. 93 , No. 12 , pp. 1791-1794
453 views DOI Abstract
2020
Training Mentor-Mentee Pairs to Build a Robust Culture for Mentorship and a Pipeline of Clinical and Translational Researchers: The Colorado Mentoring Training Program.
Nearing, Kathryn A;Nuechterlein, Bridget M;Tan, Shuyuan;Zerzan, Judy T;Libby, Anne M;Austin, Gregory L;
451 views DOI Abstract
2018
Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Patient Experiences at a Family Medicine Clinic.
Hinrichs, Amanda;Link, Carrie;Seaquist, Lea;Ehlinger, Peek;Aldrin, Stephanie;Pratt, Rebekah;
Vol. 93 , No. 1 , pp. 76-81
427 views DOI Abstract
2020
Value-Based Health Care in Undergraduate Medical Education.
Holtzman, Jessica N;Deshpande, Bhushan R;Stuart, Jessica C;Feeley, Thomas W;Witkowski, Mary;Hundert, Edward M;Kasper, Jennifer;
394 views DOI Abstract
2014
A novel approach to supporting relationship-centered care through electronic health record ergonomic training in preclerkship medical education.
Silverman, Howard;Ho, Yun-Xian;Kaib, Susan;Ellis, Wendy Danto;Moffitt, Marícela P;Chen, Qingxia;Nian, Hui;Gadd, Cynthia S;
Vol. 89 , No. 9 , pp. 1230-4
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
Management Reasoning: Implications for Health Professions Educators and a Research Agenda.
Cook, David A;Durning, Steven J;Sherbino, Jonathan;Gruppen, Larry D;
Vol. 94 , No. 9 , pp. 1310-1316
388 views DOI Abstract
2020
Attending to the Emotional Well-Being of the Health Care Workforce in a New York City Health System During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Ripp, Jonathan;Peccoralo, Lauren;Charney, Dennis;
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Teaching Evidence-Based Medicine to Medical Students Using Wikipedia as a Platform.
Murray, Heather;Walker, Melanie;Dawson, Jennifer;Simper, Natalie;Maggio, Lauren A;
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
Taking Students as They Should Be: Restoring Trust in Undergraduate Medical Education.
Slavin, Stuart;Smith, Gregory;
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Diversity and Success of Medical School Applicants with Scores in the Middle Third of the MCAT Score Scale.
Terregino, Carol A;Saguil, Aaron;Price-Johnson, Tanisha;Anachebe, Ngozi F;Goodell, Kristen;
345 views DOI Abstract
View All 146 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.