Indexed in Journament

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges

ISSN 1938-808X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.9/100
Journament Score
#7,624
Journament Rank
146
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Acad Med
Abbreviated Name acad med
ISSN 1938-808X
URL http://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/pages/default.aspx

Indexings

scopus ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (146)

2020
Training Mentor-Mentee Pairs to Build a Robust Culture for Mentorship and a Pipeline of Clinical and Translational Researchers: The Colorado Mentoring Training Program.
488 views DOI Abstract
2018
Blockchain Technology: A Data Framework to Improve Validity, Trust, and Accountability of Information Exchange in Health Professions Education.
Vol. 93 , No. 12 , pp. 1791-1794
479 views DOI Abstract
2018
Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Patient Experiences at a Family Medicine Clinic.
Vol. 93 , No. 1 , pp. 76-81
462 views DOI Abstract
2014
A novel approach to supporting relationship-centered care through electronic health record ergonomic training in preclerkship medical education.
Vol. 89 , No. 9 , pp. 1230-4
431 views DOI Abstract
2020
Value-Based Health Care in Undergraduate Medical Education.
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
Management Reasoning: Implications for Health Professions Educators and a Research Agenda.
Vol. 94 , No. 9 , pp. 1310-1316
415 views DOI Abstract
2019
Teaching Evidence-Based Medicine to Medical Students Using Wikipedia as a Platform.
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
Exploring Validity Evidence Associated With Questionnaire-Based Tools for Assessing the Professional Performance of Physicians: A Systematic Review.
Vol. 94 , No. 9 , pp. 1384-1397
374 views DOI Abstract
2024
Undergraduate Medical Education Curriculum Reforms in Pakistan: A Mixed Methods Study of Academic Leadership Perspectives.
83 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Hahnemann University Hospital Closure and What Matters: A Department Chair's Perspective.
Vol. 95 , No. 4 , pp. 494-498
21 views DOI Abstract
2020
2020
Using a Logic Model to Design and Evaluate a Quality Improvement Leadership Course.
325 views DOI Abstract
2020
Exploring the Networking of Academic Health Science Leaders: How and Why Do They Do It?
234 views DOI Abstract
2020
Lessons to Learn From Hahnemann University Hospital's Closure.
178 views DOI Abstract
2020
Value-Based Health Care in Undergraduate Medical Education.
427 views DOI Abstract
2020
Team-Based Learning Analytics: An Empirical Case Study.
187 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.