British Dental Journal | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1528 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

British Dental Journal

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name British Dental Journal
Abbreviated Name br dent j
ISSN 1476-5373
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.nature.com/bdj
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (30 total)

2019
A systematic review to assess interventions delivered by mobile phones in improving adherence to oral hygiene advice for children and adolescents.
Sharif, Mohammad Owaise;Newton, Tim;Cunningham, Susan J;
Vol. 227 , No. 5 , pp. 375-382
463 views DOI Abstract
2019
Care pathways and provision in bariatric dental care: an exploration of patients' and dentists' experiences in the North East of England.
Geddis-Regan, Andrew;Asuni, Abisola;Walton, Graham;Wassall, Rebecca;
Vol. 227 , No. 1 , pp. 38-42
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dental associates' perceptions of their working environment: a qualitative study.
O'Selmo, Ellena;Collin, Victoria;Whitehead, Penny;
Vol. 226 , No. 12 , pp. 955-962
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
Modern day slavery and the responsibility of the dental team.
Walshaw, Emma G;Patel, Kishan;
Vol. 227 , No. 9 , pp. 829-833
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Key determinants of health and wellbeing of dentists within the UK: a rapid review of over two decades of research.
Salazar, Fiorella B Colonio;Sipiyaruk, Kawin;White, Sandra;Gallagher, Jennifer E;
Vol. 227 , No. 2 , pp. 127-136
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
A revolutionary toothbrush with artificial intelligence.
Vol. 227 , No. 1 , pp. 62
380 views DOI
2013
Sugars consumption in a low-income sample of British young people and adults.
Ntouva, A;Tsakos, G;Watt, R G;
Vol. 215 , No. 1 , pp. E2
380 views DOI Abstract
2020
Autotransplantation of third molars: a literature review and preliminary protocols.
Armstrong, Lucia;O'Reilly, Claire;Ahmed, Bilal;
Vol. 228 , No. 4 , pp. 247-251
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient focused oral hygiene apps: an assessment of quality (using MARS) and knowledge content.
Sharif, Mohammad Owaise;Alkadhimi, Aslam;
Vol. 227 , No. 5 , pp. 383-386
367 views DOI Abstract
2020
Why re-invent the wheel if you've run out of road?
Hurley, Sara;
Vol. 228 , No. 10 , pp. 755-756
365 views DOI Abstract
View All 30 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.