Indexed in Journament

British Dental Journal

ISSN 1476-5373· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,285 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
30 Articles
Scores higher than 13.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name British Dental Journal
Abbreviated Name br dent j
ISSN 1476-5373
URL https://www.nature.com/bdj

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 11.1 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 6.4 7.8
Content Distribution 50.0 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (30)

2019
A systematic review to assess interventions delivered by mobile phones in improving adherence to oral hygiene advice for children and adolescents.
Sharif, Mohammad Owaise;Newton, Tim;Cunningham, Susan J;
Vol. 227 , No. 5 , pp. 375-382
519 views DOI Abstract
2019
Care pathways and provision in bariatric dental care: an exploration of patients' and dentists' experiences in the North East of England.
Geddis-Regan, Andrew;Asuni, Abisola;Walton, Graham;Wassall, Rebecca;
Vol. 227 , No. 1 , pp. 38-42
492 views DOI Abstract
2019
Key determinants of health and wellbeing of dentists within the UK: a rapid review of over two decades of research.
Salazar, Fiorella B Colonio;Sipiyaruk, Kawin;White, Sandra;Gallagher, Jennifer E;
Vol. 227 , No. 2 , pp. 127-136
463 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient focused oral hygiene apps: an assessment of quality (using MARS) and knowledge content.
Sharif, Mohammad Owaise;Alkadhimi, Aslam;
Vol. 227 , No. 5 , pp. 383-386
453 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dental associates' perceptions of their working environment: a qualitative study.
O'Selmo, Ellena;Collin, Victoria;Whitehead, Penny;
Vol. 226 , No. 12 , pp. 955-962
451 views DOI Abstract
2020
Autotransplantation of third molars: a literature review and preliminary protocols.
Armstrong, Lucia;O'Reilly, Claire;Ahmed, Bilal;
Vol. 228 , No. 4 , pp. 247-251
440 views DOI Abstract
2020
Why re-invent the wheel if you've run out of road?
Hurley, Sara;
Vol. 228 , No. 10 , pp. 755-756
435 views DOI Abstract
2013
Sugars consumption in a low-income sample of British young people and adults.
Ntouva, A;Tsakos, G;Watt, R G;
Vol. 215 , No. 1 , pp. E2
435 views DOI Abstract
2019
A revolutionary toothbrush with artificial intelligence.
Vol. 227 , No. 1 , pp. 62
434 views DOI
2019
Modern day slavery and the responsibility of the dental team.
Walshaw, Emma G;Patel, Kishan;
Vol. 227 , No. 9 , pp. 829-833
430 views DOI Abstract
2021
Freedom of movement
No Author Found
Vol. 231 , No. 9 , pp. 595-595
25 views DOI
2020
Why re-invent the wheel if you've run out of road?
Hurley, Sara;
Vol. 228 , No. 10 , pp. 755-756
435 views DOI Abstract
2020
Autotransplantation of third molars: a literature review and preliminary protocols.
Armstrong, Lucia;O'Reilly, Claire;Ahmed, Bilal;
Vol. 228 , No. 4 , pp. 247-251
440 views DOI Abstract
2019
Keep back to school sicknesses at bay
not, found
Vol. 227 , pp. 322
80 views DOI
2019
Modern day slavery and the responsibility of the dental team.
Walshaw, Emma G;Patel, Kishan;
Vol. 227 , No. 9 , pp. 829-833
430 views DOI Abstract
2019
A call to action: advocating for the integration of oral health promotion and public health via sugar sweetened beverage taxation.
Bridge, Gemma;Lomazzi, Marta;Bedi, Raman;
Vol. 227 , No. 8 , pp. 663-664
305 views DOI Abstract
2019
Key determinants of health and wellbeing of dentists within the UK: a rapid review of over two decades of research.
Salazar, Fiorella B Colonio;Sipiyaruk, Kawin;White, Sandra;Gallagher, Jennifer E;
Vol. 227 , No. 2 , pp. 127-136
463 views DOI Abstract
2019
A lonely business: reflections on the wellbeing and morale of dental teams.
Hayer, Natasha;Wassif, Hoda S;
Vol. 226 , No. 8 , pp. 559-561
245 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient focused oral hygiene apps: an assessment of quality (using MARS) and knowledge content.
Sharif, Mohammad Owaise;Alkadhimi, Aslam;
Vol. 227 , No. 5 , pp. 383-386
453 views DOI Abstract
2019
The growth of general dental practice in a developing Sussex seaside resort 1885-1916 - Part 1: the early settlers.
Hellyer, Paul;
Vol. 227 , No. 5 , pp. 419-425
333 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
27.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,285 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

27.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

50.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.