Patient focused oral hygiene apps: an assessment of quality (using MARS) and knowledge content.
Clicks: 471
ID: 53254
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
77.7
/100
471 views
336 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #5 of 30 articles by views in British Dental Journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Introduction Smartphone apps can be a valuable means for education and prevention to improve the health of children, adolescents and adults. A recent review of apps has revealed that there are over 1,000 patient-focused oral hygiene apps available on the Apple App Store and Google Play (Android) store.Objective The purpose of this research is to objectively assess the quality of 20 commercially available, patient-focused oral hygiene apps using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). Furthermore, the accuracy of oral hygiene-related information contained within the apps will be assessed.Methods Apps meeting inclusion criteria were evaluated for: 1) quality using the MARS tool; and 2) information accuracy using an eight-item, evidence-based checklist relating to important aspects in the prevention of caries and periodontal disease.Results The mean app quality score was 3.4/5 (2.3-4.9). On average, of the four MARS subscales assessed, 'functionality' had the highest mean score (4) and 'information' had the lowest (2.9). With regard to the accuracy of information contained within these apps, only two were found to contain accurate information for all eight items of the checklist. The majority (60%) of the apps (n = 13) did not contain information relating to at least 50% or more of the items present.Conclusions Currently available apps appear to be functional, however, there is a need to improve engagement, aesthetics and most importantly information content of apps.
| Reference Key |
sharif2019patientbritish
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sharif, Mohammad Owaise;Alkadhimi, Aslam; |
| Journal | British Dental Journal |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1038/s41415-019-0665-0
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.