The Journal of nervous and mental disease | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8477 / 33,987
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

The Journal of nervous and mental disease

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name J Nerv Ment Dis
Abbreviated Name j nerv ment dis
ISSN 1539-736X
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (16 total)

2019
Internet Addiction Among Lebanese Adolescents: The Role of Self-Esteem, Anger, Depression, Anxiety, Social Anxiety and Fear, Impulsivity, and Aggression-A Cross-Sectional Study.
Obeid, Sahar;Saade, Sylvia;Haddad, Chadia;Sacre, Hala;Khansa, Wael;Al Hajj, Roula;Kheir, Nelly;Hallit, Souheil;
421 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mental Health Literacy Among Chinese Rural Residents: A Survey From Hubei Province in Central China on People's Perception of Mental Illnesses.
Li, Fenglan;Li, Shengnan;Zhou, Chunxiao;Wang, Fei;
400 views DOI Abstract
2019
Metacognitive Interpersonal Mindfulness-Based Training for Worry About Interpersonal Events: A Pilot Feasibility and Acceptability Study.
Ottavi, Paolo;Passarella, Tiziana;Pasinetti, Manuela;MacBeth, Angus;Velotti, Patrizia;Velotti, Anna;Bandiera, Aldea;Popolo, Raffaele;Salvatore, Giampaolo;Dimaggio, Giancarlo;
Vol. 207 , No. 11 , pp. 944-950
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Metacognitive Capacity Is Related to Self-Reported Social Functioning and May Moderate the Effects of Symptoms on Interpersonal Behavior.
Fischer, Melanie W;Dimaggio, Giancarlo;Hochheiser, Jesse;Vohs, Jenifer L;Phalen, Peter;Lysaker, Paul H;
376 views DOI Abstract
2020
Combat Experiences Link With Posttraumatic Growth Among Veterans Across Conflicts: The Influence of PTSD and Depression.
LaRocca, Michael A;Avery, Timothy J;
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Mediating Role of Implicit and Explicit Emotion Regulation in the Relationship Between Academic Emotions and Approaches to Learning: Do Defense Styles Matter?
Rentzios, Christos;Kamtsios, Spiridon;Karagiannopoulou, Evangelia;
Vol. 207 , No. 8 , pp. 683-692
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
Investigating the Relationship Between Weight-Related Self-Stigma and Mental Health for Overweight/Obese Children in Hong Kong.
Chan, Ka Lam;Lee, Clara S C;Cheng, Cho Man;Hui, Lok Yiu;So, Wan Tung;Yu, Tik Shun;Lin, Chung-Ying;
Vol. 207 , No. 8 , pp. 637-641
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
Posttraumatic Stress and Depression Among Syrian Refugees Living in Turkey: Findings From an Urban Sample.
Kaya, Edip;Kılıç, Cengiz;Karadağ Çaman, Özge;Üner, Sarp;
320 views DOI Abstract
2020
Safety and Efficacy of Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) for Treating Mild to Moderate Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Dai, Lili;Chen, Lingyan;Wang, Wenjing;
Vol. 208 , No. 4 , pp. 269-276
309 views DOI Abstract
2019
Tracing Metacognition in Psychotherapy: Associations With Symptoms of General Distress and Depression
Arnon-Ribenfeld, N.
Vol. 207 , pp. 936-943
287 views DOI
View All 16 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.