Indexed in Journament

Natural Hazards

ISSN 0921-030X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.2/100
Journament Score
#10,732
Journament Rank
17
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Natural Hazards
Abbreviated Name natural hazards
ISSN 0921-030X

Indexings

scopus ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2020
Soil erosion potential hotspot zone identification using machine learning and statistical approaches in eastern India
, pp. 1-36
398 views DOI Abstract
2013
Landslide susceptibility mapping by binary logistic regression, analytical hierarchy process, and statistical index models and assessment of their performances
Vol. 69 , No. 1 , pp. 749-779
381 views DOI Abstract
2015
Binary logistic regression versus stochastic gradient boosted decision trees in assessing landslide susceptibility for multiple-occurring landslide events: application to the 2009 storm event in Messina (Sicily, southern Italy)
Vol. 79 , No. 3 , pp. 1621-1648
375 views DOI Abstract
1970
A GIS-Based Multivariate Statistical Analysis for Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in La Pobla de Lillet Area (Eastern Pyrenees, Spain)
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 281-295
375 views DOI Abstract
2012
Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran
Vol. 63 , No. 2 , pp. 965-996
345 views DOI Abstract
2018
Landslide susceptibility assessment at the Wuning area, China: a comparison between multi-criteria decision making, bivariate statistical and machine learning methods
Vol. 96 , No. 1 , pp. 173-212
332 views DOI Abstract
2014
An assessment of multivariate and bivariate approaches in landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study of Duzkoy district
Vol. 76 , No. 1 , pp. 471-496
293 views DOI Abstract
2016
Presence-only approach to assess landslide triggering-thickness susceptibility: a test for the Mili catchment (north-eastern Sicily, Italy)
Vol. 84 , No. 1 , pp. 565-588
262 views DOI Abstract
2023
Delineating village-level drought risk in Marinduque Island, Philippines
Vol. 116 , pp. 2993-3014
42 views DOI
2020
Soil erosion potential hotspot zone identification using machine learning and statistical approaches in eastern India
, pp. 1-36
242 views DOI
2020
Soil erosion potential hotspot zone identification using machine learning and statistical approaches in eastern India
, pp. 1-36
398 views DOI Abstract
2018
Landslide susceptibility assessment at the Wuning area, China: a comparison between multi-criteria decision making, bivariate statistical and machine learning methods
Vol. 96 , No. 1 , pp. 173-212
332 views DOI Abstract
2018
Decadal flood trends in Bangladesh from extensive hydrographic data
Vol. 90 , pp. 115-135
169 views DOI
2016
Presence-only approach to assess landslide triggering-thickness susceptibility: a test for the Mili catchment (north-eastern Sicily, Italy)
Vol. 84 , No. 1 , pp. 565-588
262 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
31
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.