Indexed in Journament

Natural Hazards

ISSN 0921-030X· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,747 of 29,297 scored journals (34,016 indexed)
17 Articles
Scores higher than 87.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Natural Hazards
Abbreviated Name natural hazards
ISSN 0921-030X

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 20.0
Diversity 70.4
Innovation 18.0
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 71.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.5
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 20.0 3.0
Diversity 70.4 26.2
Innovation 18.0 24.1
Community Impact 4.3 4.7
Content Distribution 71.5 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2020
Soil erosion potential hotspot zone identification using machine learning and statistical approaches in eastern India
Rabin Chakrabortty;Subodh Chandra Pal;Mehebub Sahana;Ayan Mondal;Jie Dou;Binh Thai Pham;Ali P. Yunus;Rabin Chakrabortty;Subodh Chandra Pal;Mehebub Sahana;Ayan Mondal;Jie Dou;Binh Thai Pham;Ali P. Yunus;
, pp. 1-36
441 views DOI Abstract
2013
Landslide susceptibility mapping by binary logistic regression, analytical hierarchy process, and statistical index models and assessment of their performances
H. R. Pourghasemi;H. R. Moradi;S. M. Fatemi Aghda;H. R. Pourghasemi;H. R. Moradi;S. M. Fatemi Aghda;
Vol. 69 , No. 1 , pp. 749-779
426 views DOI Abstract
1970
A GIS-Based Multivariate Statistical Analysis for Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in La Pobla de Lillet Area (Eastern Pyrenees, Spain)
Núria Santacana;Baeza Baeza;Jordi Corominas;Ana De Paz;Jordi Marturiá;Núria Santacana;Baeza Baeza;Jordi Corominas;Ana De Paz;Jordi Marturiá;
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 281-295
420 views DOI Abstract
2015
Binary logistic regression versus stochastic gradient boosted decision trees in assessing landslide susceptibility for multiple-occurring landslide events: application to the 2009 storm event in Messina (Sicily, southern Italy)
L. Lombardo;M. Cama;C. Conoscenti;M. Märker;E. Rotigliano;L. Lombardo;M. Cama;C. Conoscenti;M. Märker;E. Rotigliano;
Vol. 79 , No. 3 , pp. 1621-1648
411 views DOI Abstract
2012
Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran
Hamid Reza Pourghasemi;Biswajeet Pradhan;Candan Gokceoglu;Hamid Reza Pourghasemi;Biswajeet Pradhan;Candan Gokceoglu;
Vol. 63 , No. 2 , pp. 965-996
380 views DOI Abstract
2018
Landslide susceptibility assessment at the Wuning area, China: a comparison between multi-criteria decision making, bivariate statistical and machine learning methods
Haoyuan Hong;Himan Shahabi;Ataollah Shirzadi;Wei Chen;Kamran Chapi;Baharin Bin Ahmad;Majid Shadman Roodposhti;Arastoo Yari Hesar;Yingying Tian;Dieu Tien Bui;Haoyuan Hong;Himan Shahabi;Ataollah Shirzadi;Wei Chen;Kamran Chapi;Baharin Bin Ahmad;Majid Shadman Roodposhti;Arastoo Yari Hesar;Yingying Tian;Dieu Tien Bui;
Vol. 96 , No. 1 , pp. 173-212
368 views DOI Abstract
2014
An assessment of multivariate and bivariate approaches in landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study of Duzkoy district
Taskin Kavzoglu;Emrehan Kutlug Sahin;Ismail Colkesen;Taskin Kavzoglu;Emrehan Kutlug Sahin;Ismail Colkesen;
Vol. 76 , No. 1 , pp. 471-496
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Health vulnerability to flood-induced risks of households in flood-prone informal settlements in the Coastal City of Mombasa, Kenya
Okaka, F.
Vol. 99 , pp. 1007-1029
323 views DOI
2017
Disaster prevention, disaster preparedness and local community resilience within the context of disaster risk management in Cameroon
Aka, F.
Vol. 86 , pp. 57-88
323 views DOI
2016
Presence-only approach to assess landslide triggering-thickness susceptibility: a test for the Mili catchment (north-eastern Sicily, Italy)
L. Lombardo;G. Fubelli;G. Amato;M. Bonasera;L. Lombardo;G. Fubelli;G. Amato;M. Bonasera;
Vol. 84 , No. 1 , pp. 565-588
301 views DOI Abstract
2023
Delineating village-level drought risk in Marinduque Island, Philippines
Salvacion, A.R.
Vol. 116 , pp. 2993-3014
83 views DOI
2020
Soil erosion potential hotspot zone identification using machine learning and statistical approaches in eastern India
Rabin Chakrabortty,Subodh Chandra Pal,Mehebub Sahana,Ayan Mondal,Himan Shahabi,Binh Thai Pham,A. P. Yunus;Rabin Chakrabortty;Subodh Chandra Pal;Mehebub Sahana;Ayan Mondal;Himan Shahabi;Binh Thai Pham;A. P. Yunus;
, pp. 1-36
276 views DOI
2020
Soil erosion potential hotspot zone identification using machine learning and statistical approaches in eastern India
Rabin Chakrabortty;Subodh Chandra Pal;Mehebub Sahana;Ayan Mondal;Jie Dou;Binh Thai Pham;Ali P. Yunus;Rabin Chakrabortty;Subodh Chandra Pal;Mehebub Sahana;Ayan Mondal;Jie Dou;Binh Thai Pham;Ali P. Yunus;
, pp. 1-36
441 views DOI Abstract
2019
Health vulnerability to flood-induced risks of households in flood-prone informal settlements in the Coastal City of Mombasa, Kenya
Okaka, F.
Vol. 99 , pp. 1007-1029
323 views DOI
2019
Chinese urban resident willingness to pay for green housing based on double-entry mental accounting theory
Li, Q.
Vol. 95 , pp. 129-153
252 views DOI
2019
The use of watershed geomorphic data in flash flood susceptibility zoning: a case study of the Karnaphuli and Sangu river basins of Bangladesh
Adnan, M.
, pp. 0-0
283 views DOI
2018
Landslide susceptibility assessment at the Wuning area, China: a comparison between multi-criteria decision making, bivariate statistical and machine learning methods
Haoyuan Hong;Himan Shahabi;Ataollah Shirzadi;Wei Chen;Kamran Chapi;Baharin Bin Ahmad;Majid Shadman Roodposhti;Arastoo Yari Hesar;Yingying Tian;Dieu Tien Bui;Haoyuan Hong;Himan Shahabi;Ataollah Shirzadi;Wei Chen;Kamran Chapi;Baharin Bin Ahmad;Majid Shadman Roodposhti;Arastoo Yari Hesar;Yingying Tian;Dieu Tien Bui;
Vol. 96 , No. 1 , pp. 173-212
368 views DOI Abstract
2018
Decadal flood trends in Bangladesh from extensive hydrographic data
Sciance, M.
Vol. 90 , pp. 115-135
196 views DOI
2017
Disaster prevention, disaster preparedness and local community resilience within the context of disaster risk management in Cameroon
Aka, F.
Vol. 86 , pp. 57-88
323 views DOI
2016
Presence-only approach to assess landslide triggering-thickness susceptibility: a test for the Mili catchment (north-eastern Sicily, Italy)
L. Lombardo;G. Fubelli;G. Amato;M. Bonasera;L. Lombardo;G. Fubelli;G. Amato;M. Bonasera;
Vol. 84 , No. 1 , pp. 565-588
301 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,747 of 29,297 scored
(34,016 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

70.4/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

18.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.