anziam journal | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1753 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 hafta önce

anziam journal

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indekslemeler
ulakbim
Kisa Ad anziam journal
Kisaltilmis Ad anziam journal
ISSN 1446-1811
Amac ve Kapsam
URL http://journals.cambridge.org/ANZ
Yazar Talimatlari

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (190 total)

2009
design of a sea-level tsunami detection network for the gulf of cadiz
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 1327-1338
424 views Abstract
2013
dynamic risk simulation to assess natural hazards risk along roads
Vol. 13 , No. 11 , pp. 2763-2777
299 views DOI Abstract
2017
planar seismic source characterization models developed for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of istanbul
Vol. 17 , pp. 2365-2381
295 views DOI Abstract
2009
a gis method for assessment of rock slide tsunami hazard in all norwegian lakes and reservoirs
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 353-364
290 views Abstract
2014
a data-based comparison of flood frequency analysis methods used in france
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 295-308
284 views DOI Abstract
2014
chlorophyll increases off the coasts of japan after the 2011 tsunami using nasa/modis data
Vol. 14 , No. 8 , pp. 1999-2008
282 views DOI Abstract
2012
preface "radon, health and natural hazards ii"
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 799-803
282 views DOI
2008
selection of historic heavy large-scale rainfall events in the czech republic
Vol. 8 , No. 6 , pp. 1359-1367
275 views Abstract
2011
physical and numerical modelling of a bedload deposition area for an alpine torrent
Vol. 11 , No. 6 , pp. 1589-1597
270 views DOI Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.