world academy of science, engineering and technology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#959 / 33,917
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

world academy of science, engineering and technology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name world academy of science, engineering and technology
Abbreviated Name world academy of science, engineering and technology
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (51 total)

2011
influence of prosthesis type and material on the stress distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis
;Gökçe Meriç;Erkan Erkmen;Ahmet Kurt;Yahya Tunç;Atılım Eser
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 25-32
558 views DOI Abstract
2018
effect of zinc on the collagen degradation in acid-etched dentin
;Soram Oh;Hyun-Sook Jung;Hyun-Jung Kim;Ji-Hyun Jang;Duck-Su Kim;Kyoung-Kyu Choi;Sun-Young Kim
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 97-102
418 views DOI Abstract
2012
factors correlated with developing caries during orthodontic treatment: changes in saliva and behavioral risks
;Edith Lara-Carrillo;Norma Margarita Montiel-Bastida;Leonor Sánchez-Pérez;Jorge Alanís-Tavira
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 218-223
406 views DOI Abstract
2012
evaluation of the surface roughness of a standard abraded dental porcelain following different polishing techniques
;Haroon Rashid
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 184-189
393 views DOI Abstract
2016
emotional relationships between child patients and their mothers during dental treatments
;Shizuka Tanaka;Naoko Uehara;Natsumi Tsuchihashi;Kumiko Sugimoto
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 287-292
391 views DOI Abstract
2013
interfacial evaluation of endodontically treated teeth restored with selected adhesive materials and glass fiber posts: an sem analysis
;Erdem Özdemir;Wei-Shao Lin;Selim Erkut;Abidin Hakan Tuncer
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 365-372
343 views DOI Abstract
2016
the best radiographic method for determining root canal morphology in mandibular first premolars: a study of chinese descendants in taiwan
;Yu Sun;Tzu-Yi Lu;Yi- Chen Chen;Shue-Fen Yang
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 175-181
338 views DOI Abstract
2012
root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a turkish population
;Erdal Özcan;Hakan Çolak;Mehmet Mustafa Hamidi
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 390-394
330 views DOI Abstract
2015
body temperature increases during pediatric full mouth rehabilitation surgery under general anesthesia
;Yi-Shan Chuang;Chung-Hsing Li;Chen-Hwan Cherng
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 372-375
311 views DOI Abstract
2010
Adsorption of textile reactive dye by palm shell activated carbon: Response Surface Methodology
Rusly S.
Vol. 43 , pp. 892-895
303 views
View All 51 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.