Indexed in Journament

world academy of science, engineering and technology

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #6,346 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
51 Articles
Scores higher than 78.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name world academy of science, engineering and technology
Abbreviated Name world academy of science, engineering and technology

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 6.4
Content Distribution 70.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for world academy of science, engineering and technology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 6.4 7.8
Content Distribution 70.8 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (51)

2011
influence of prosthesis type and material on the stress distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 25-32
610 views DOI Abstract
2018
effect of zinc on the collagen degradation in acid-etched dentin
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 97-102
478 views DOI Abstract
2012
factors correlated with developing caries during orthodontic treatment: changes in saliva and behavioral risks
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 218-223
474 views DOI Abstract
2016
emotional relationships between child patients and their mothers during dental treatments
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 287-292
458 views DOI Abstract
2013
interfacial evaluation of endodontically treated teeth restored with selected adhesive materials and glass fiber posts: an sem analysis
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 365-372
409 views DOI Abstract
2016
the best radiographic method for determining root canal morphology in mandibular first premolars: a study of chinese descendants in taiwan
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 175-181
406 views DOI Abstract
2012
root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a turkish population
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 390-394
365 views DOI Abstract
2015
body temperature increases during pediatric full mouth rehabilitation surgery under general anesthesia
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 372-375
360 views DOI Abstract
2011
2018
comparison of antimicrobial activity of traditional and new developed root sealers against pathogens related root canal
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 54-59
178 views Abstract
2018
effect of zinc on the collagen degradation in acid-etched dentin
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 97-102
478 views DOI Abstract
2018
copyright transfer statement
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. e12-
15 views
2018
instructions to authors
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e8
154 views
2017
burkitt's lymphoma of the mandible
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. 421-423
183 views
2017
evaluation of five primers and two opaque resins for bonding ceria-stabilized zirconia/alumina nanocomposite
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 91-94
235 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparison of oral malodors before and after nonsurgical periodontal therapy in chronic periodontitis patients
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 156-160
311 views DOI Abstract
2017
2017
apical extrusion of enterococcus faecalis in different canal geometries during the use of nickel titanium systems with different motion types
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
300 views DOI Abstract
2016
the best radiographic method for determining root canal morphology in mandibular first premolars: a study of chinese descendants in taiwan
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 175-181
406 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #6,346 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.