Indexed in Journament

research journal of environmental toxicology

EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #24,990 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
58 Articles
Scores higher than 14.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

简称 research journal of environmental toxicology
缩写名称 research journal of environmental toxicology
URL https://scialert.net/jindex.php?issn=1819-3420

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 0.0 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 5.0 5.8
Content Distribution 63.3 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (58)

2014
research on the relationship of institutional innovation, organizational learning and synergistic effect: an empirical study of chineses university spin-offs
;Zhang Hao;Ding Yunlong
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 645-659
740 views DOI Abstract
2013
passenger sharing of the high-speed railway from sensitivity analysis caused by price and run-time based on the multi-agent system
;Ma Ning;Yin Ge;Zuo Yang
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 1210-1222
485 views DOI Abstract
2013
developing topsis method using statistical normalization for selecting knowledge management strategies
;Amin Zadeh Sarraf;Ali Mohaghar;Hossein Bazargani
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 860-875
386 views DOI Abstract
2015
risk leveling in business environments - a novel approach for macro risk management
;Shahid Rasheed;ChangFeng Wang;Faiza Yaqub;Suhail Memon
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 738-762
338 views DOI Abstract
2013
option of operating speed for vessels under low-carbon economy
;Gang Li;Huan Xu;Wei Liu
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 289-296
336 views DOI Abstract
2013
research on bulk-cargo-port berth assignment based on priority of resource allocation
;Chunfang Guo;Zhongliang Guan;Yan Song
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 276-288
318 views DOI Abstract
2012
low-carbon scenario analysis on urban transport of one metropolitan in china in 2020
;Xiaofei Chen;Zijia Wang
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 344-353
317 views DOI Abstract
2018
increasing the efficiency and productivity in the production of low voltage switchboard using resource constrained project scheduling
;Hendy Tannady;Yona Maimury
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-33
314 views DOI Abstract
2010
Biodegradation of pesticidal residue using traditional plants with medicinal properties and trichoderma
Subashini H.
Vol. 4 , pp. 256-262
303 views DOI
2018
formative assessment framework proposal for transversal competencies: application to analysis and problem-solving competence
;Pedro Gómez-Gasquet;Mª José Verdecho;Raúl Rodriguez-Rodriguez;Juan José Alfaro-Saiz
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 334-340
300 views DOI Abstract
2018
influence of portofolio management in decision-making
;Rolney Baptestone;Roque Rabechini Jr.
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 406-428
160 views DOI Abstract
2018
formative assessment framework proposal for transversal competencies: application to analysis and problem-solving competence
;Pedro Gómez-Gasquet;Mª José Verdecho;Raúl Rodriguez-Rodriguez;Juan José Alfaro-Saiz
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 334-340
300 views DOI Abstract
2018
economic and environmental packaging sustainability: a case study
;Iván González Boubeta;Mar Fernández Vázquez;Pablo Domínguez Caamaño;José Carlos Prado Prado
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 229-238
240 views DOI Abstract
2018
identification of reverse logistics decision types from mathematical models
;Pascual Cortés Pellicer;Faustino Alarcón Valero
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 239-249
286 views DOI Abstract
2018
evaluation of pull production control strategies under uncertainty: an integrated fuzzy ahp-topsis approach
;Aydin Torkabadi;Rene Mayorga
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 161-184
232 views DOI Abstract
2018
an anp-based network to measure the impact of lean production on organisational performance
;José Luis Ruano Pérez;Raúl Rodríguez-Rodríguez;Juan-José Alfaro Saiz;María-José Verdecho
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 222-228
167 views DOI Abstract
2018
increasing the efficiency and productivity in the production of low voltage switchboard using resource constrained project scheduling
;Hendy Tannady;Yona Maimury
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-33
314 views DOI Abstract
2018
the impact of organizational factors on-business adoption: an empirical analysis
;Marta García-Moreno;Susana María García Moreno;Juan Jose Nájera-Sanchez;Carmen De Pablos-Heredero
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 466-496
282 views DOI Abstract
2016
the measurement invariance of job diagnostic survey (jds) across three university student groups
;Monica Martinez-Gomez;Juan A. Marin-Garcia;Martha Girado O`Meara
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 17-34
238 views DOI Abstract
2016
managing waiting times to predict no-shows and cancelations at a children’s hospital
;Miguel Rodríguez-García;Aldo A McLean-Carranza;J. Carlos Prado-Prado;Pablo Domínguez-Caamaño
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. 1107-1118
223 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
27.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #24,990 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

27.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

0.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

63.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.