Indexed in Journament

BMC medical research methodology

ISSN 1471-2288· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.4/100
Journament Score
#8,412
Journament Rank
38
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name BMC Med Res Methodol
Abbreviated Name bmc med res methodol
ISSN 1471-2288

Indexings

scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (38)

2007
The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial
Rob McCarney; James Warner; Steve Iliffe; Robbert van Haselen; Mark Griffin; Peter Fisher
1,729 views DOI
2003
Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio
Aluísio JD Barros, Vânia N Hirakata;Aluísio JD Barros;Vânia N Hirakata;
Vol. 3 , pp. 21-
1,122 views DOI Abstract
2003
Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio
Barros AJ;Hirakata VN;;
Vol. 3 , pp. -
725 views Abstract
2003
Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio - BMC Medical Research Methodology
Barros, Aluísio JD;Hirakata, Vânia N;Barros, Aluísio JD;Hirakata, Vânia N;
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 1-13
478 views DOI Abstract
2011
Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials
Noori, Akhtar-Danesh;Jinhui, Ma;Lisa, Dolovich;Lehana, Thabane;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 18-
474 views Abstract
2019
Methods of identifying and recruiting older people at risk of social isolation and loneliness: a mixed methods review.
Ige, Janet;Gibbons, Lynn;Bray, Issy;Gray, Selena;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 181
473 views DOI Abstract
2019
Which design to evaluate complex interventions? Toward a methodological framework through a systematic review
Minary, Laetitia;Trompette, Justine;Kivits, Joëlle;Cambon, Linda;Tarquinio, Cyril;Alla, François;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
471 views Abstract
2009
Meta-Analyst: software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic data
H, Schmid Christopher;C, Wallace Byron;Joseph, Lau;A, Trikalinos Thomas;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 80-
460 views Abstract
2008
Sampling 'hard-to-reach' populations in health research: yield from a study targeting Americans living in Canada.
Southern, Danielle A;Lewis, Steven;Maxwell, Colleen J;Dunn, James R;Noseworthy, Tom W;Corbett, Gail;Thomas, Karen;Ghali, William A;
Vol. 8 , pp. 57
451 views DOI Abstract
2007
Recruiting and retaining GPs and patients in intervention studies: the DEPS-GP project as a case study
T, Lautenschlager Nicola;Ngaire, Kerse;Moira, Sim;Orla, Tyson;J, Pfaff Jon;Jane, Pirkis;K, Williamson Michelle;P, Stocks Nigel;P, Almeida Osvaldo;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 42-
448 views Abstract
2024
GPT-4 performance on querying scientific publications: reproducibility, accuracy, and impact of an instruction sheet.
Tao, Kaiming;Osman, Zachary A;Tzou, Philip L;Rhee, Soo-Yon;Ahluwalia, Vineet;Shafer, Robert W;
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 139
80 views DOI Abstract
2022
Applying the 4Ps of social marketing to retain and engage participants in longitudinal cohort studies: generation 2 Raine study participant perspectives
Costello, L.
Vol. 22 , pp. 0-0
93 views DOI Abstract
2020
Database selection and data gathering methods in systematic reviews of qualitative research regarding diabetes mellitus - an explorative study
T. Justesen; Josefine Freyberg; A. N. Ø. Schultz
24 views DOI Abstract
2020
A conceptual framework for prognostic research.
Kent, Peter;Cancelliere, Carol;Boyle, Eleanor;Cassidy, J David;Kongsted, Alice;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 172
252 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ensuring protocol compliance and data transparency in clinical trials using Blockchain smart contracts.
Omar, Ilhaam A;Jayaraman, Raja;Salah, Khaled;Simsekler, Mecit Can Emre;Yaqoob, Ibrar;Ellahham, Samer;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 224
347 views DOI Abstract
2020
Informing retention in longitudinal cohort studies through a social marketing lens: Raine Study Generation 2 participants’ perspectives on benefits and barriers to participation
Leesa Costello,J. Dare,Manon Dontje,Leon Straker;Leesa Costello;J. Dare;Manon Dontje;Leon Straker;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 1-14
350 views DOI Abstract
2020
Informing retention in longitudinal cohort studies through a social marketing lens: Raine Study Generation 2 participants’ perspectives on benefits and barriers to participation
Leesa Costello;Julie Dare;Manon Dontje;Leon Straker;Leesa Costello;Julie Dare;Manon Dontje;Leon Straker;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 1-14
342 views DOI Abstract
2020
schema: an open-source, distributed mobile platform for deploying mHealth research tools and interventions.
Shatte, Adrian B R;Teague, Samantha J;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 91
294 views DOI Abstract
2020
Flexible age-period-cohort modelling illustrated using obesity prevalence data.
Dobson, Annette;Hockey, Richard;Chan, Hsiu-Wen;Mishra, Gita;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 16
172 views DOI Abstract
2020
Using research networks to generate trustworthy qualitative public health research findings from multiple contexts.
Nyirenda, Lot;Kumar, Meghan Bruce;Theobald, Sally;Sarker, Malabika;Simwinga, Musonda;Kumwenda, Moses;Johnson, Cheryl;Hatzold, Karin;Corbett, Elizabeth L;Sibanda, Euphemia;Taegtmeyer, Miriam;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 13
222 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
41
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

40.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.