Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio
Clicks: 250
ID: 267432
2003
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
17.1
/100
57 views
57 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Cross-sectional studies with binary outcomes analyzed by logistic regression are frequent in the epidemiological literature. However, the odds ratio can importantly overestimate the prevalence ratio, the measure of choice in these studies. Also, controlling ...
| Reference Key |
hirakata2003bmcalternatives
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Aluísio JD Barros, Vânia N Hirakata;Aluísio JD Barros;Vânia N Hirakata; |
| Journal | BMC medical research methodology |
| Year | 2003 |
| DOI |
10.1186/1471-2288-3-21
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
National Center for Biotechnology Information
NCBI
NLM
MEDLINE
humans
pubmed abstract
nih
national institutes of health
national library of medicine
logistic models
models
research support
non-u.s. gov't
Comparative Study
linear models
Evaluation Study
Proportional Hazards Models
odds ratio
statistical*
prevalence
empirical research
pmid:14567763
pmc521200
doi:10.1186/1471-2288-3-21
aluísio j d barros
vânia n hirakata
cross-sectional studies*
poisson distribution
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.