environmental science and technology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#768 / 33,934
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

environmental science and technology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name environmental science and technology
Abbreviated Name environmental science and technology
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (41 total)

2019
Selective Ingestion and Egestion of Plastic Particles by the Blue Mussel (Mytilus edulis) and Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica): Implications for Using Bivalves as Bioindicators of Microplastic Pollution
Ward, J.
Vol. 53 , pp. 8776-8784
300 views DOI
2008
Occurrence of two genotypes of tetracycline (TC) resistance gene tet(M) in the TC-resistant bacteria in marine sediments of Japan
Rahman, M.
Vol. 42 , pp. 5055-5061
283 views DOI
2009
Efficacy of constructed wetlands in pesticide removal from tailwaters in the central valley, California
Budd, R.
Vol. 43 , pp. 2925-2930
278 views DOI
2012
tobacco as cultural signifier: a cultural history of masculinity and nationality in habsburg hungary
;Alexander Maxwell
Vol. 5 , pp. 45-64
271 views DOI Abstract
2018
Evaluation of Variability in Greenhouse Gas Intensity of Canadian Oil Sands Surface Mining and Upgrading Operations
Sleep, S.
Vol. 52 , pp. 11941-11951
259 views DOI
2010
Biodegradation of RDX and MNX with rhodococcus sp. strain DN22: New insights into the degradation pathway
Annamaria H.
Vol. 44 , pp. 9330-9336
256 views DOI
2012
tripping over the dead: hungarian-israeli holocaust survivor women's narratives of immigration, restoration, and remembrance
;Ilana Rosen
Vol. 5 , pp. 348-361
244 views DOI Abstract
2017
Interactive Effects of Corrosion, Copper, and Chloramines on Legionella and Mycobacteria in Hot Water Plumbing
Rhoads, W.
Vol. 51 , pp. 7065-7075
242 views DOI
2010
Deconstructing energy use in microelectronics manufacturing: An experimental case study of a MEMS fabrication facility
Branham, M.
Vol. 44 , pp. 4295-4301
238 views DOI
2008
diversity in elementary schools in hungary
;Tünde Szécsi
Vol. 1 , pp. 44-62
232 views DOI Abstract
View All 41 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.