Indexed in Journament

the oncologist

ISSN 1549-490X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.1/100
Journament Score
#8,839
Journament Rank
15
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name oncologist
Abbreviated Name oncologist
ISSN 1549-490X

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2019
Toward an Expert Level of Lung Cancer Detection and Classification Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network.
406 views DOI Abstract
2020
Is Adjuvant Chemotherapy Necessary for Patients with Deficient Mismatch Repair Gastric Cancer?-Autophagy Inhibition Matches the Mismatched.
348 views DOI Abstract
2020
Second Primary Malignancies in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
Small Cell and Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck: Comparing Incidence and Survival Trends Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Data.
338 views DOI Abstract
2020
Lymph Node Imaging in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer: Concurrent Diagnostic Tools.
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. e231-e242
332 views DOI Abstract
2020
Phase II Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Oral ENMD-2076 for the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Fibrolamellar Carcinoma.
331 views DOI Abstract
2020
NFE2L2/KEAP1 mutations correlate with higher TMB value/PD-L1 expression and potentiate improved clinical outcome with immunotherapy.
323 views DOI Abstract
1998
THE MARCH: Coming Together to Conquer Cancertrade mark.
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 135-142
278 views Abstract
1997
Regarding: Rosenthal DI, Glatstein E. "We've Got a Treatment, but What's the Disease?" The Oncologist 1996;1.
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 59-61
258 views Abstract
2025
Sarcoid-like reactions in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors for advanced solid tumors.
Vol. 30
78 views DOI Abstract
2025
Correlation between tumor growth rate and survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan.
Vol. 30
62 views DOI Abstract
2020
Phase II Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Oral ENMD-2076 for the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Fibrolamellar Carcinoma.
331 views DOI Abstract
2020
Blinatumomab for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: The First Bispecific T-Cell Engager Antibody to Be Approved by the EMA for Minimal Residual Disease.
Vol. 25 , No. 4 , pp. e709-e715
256 views DOI Abstract
2020
NFE2L2/KEAP1 mutations correlate with higher TMB value/PD-L1 expression and potentiate improved clinical outcome with immunotherapy.
323 views DOI Abstract
2020
Is Adjuvant Chemotherapy Necessary for Patients with Deficient Mismatch Repair Gastric Cancer?-Autophagy Inhibition Matches the Mismatched.
348 views DOI Abstract
2020
Lymph Node Imaging in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer: Concurrent Diagnostic Tools.
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. e231-e242
332 views DOI Abstract
2020
Second Primary Malignancies in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
Small Cell and Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck: Comparing Incidence and Survival Trends Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Data.
338 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.