Medical Education Online | Journament

Journal Ranking

#7387 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Medical Education Online

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim soc
Short Name Medical Education Online
Abbreviated Name medical education online
ISSN 1087-2981
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2019
Development of an empathy and clarity rating scale to measure the effect of medical improv on end-of-first-year OCSE performance: a pilot study.
Terregino, Carol A;Copeland, H Liesel;Sarfaty, Suzanne C;Lantz-Gefroh, Valeri;Hoffmann-Longtin, Krista;
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 1666537
392 views DOI Abstract
2020
Medical students' motivation and academic performance: the mediating roles of self-efficacy and learning engagement.
Wu, Hongbin;Li, Shan;Zheng, Juan;Guo, Jianru;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 1742964
377 views DOI Abstract
2017
The relevance and role of homestays in medical education: a scoping study.
Hughes, Bonnie Olivia;Moshabela, Mosa;Owen, Jenni;Gaede, Bernhard;
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 1320185
358 views DOI Abstract
2016
From PBL tutoring to PBL coaching in undergraduate medical education: an interpretative phenomenological analysis study.
Wang, Qing;Li, Huiping;Pang, Weiguo;
Vol. 21 , pp. 31973
357 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evaluation of the effectiveness of student learning and teacher instruction on team-based learning during quality control of diagnostic imaging.
Tsai, Meng-Fang;Jao, Jo-Chi;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 1732159
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
A 360-degree assessment of teaching effectiveness using a structured-videorecorded observed teaching exercise for faculty development.
Jones, Christopher A;Watkins, Franklin S;Williams, Julie;Lambros, Ann;Callahan, Kathryn E;Lawlor, Janice;Williamson, Jeff D;High, Kevin P;Atkinson, Hal H;
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 1596708
335 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ending student mistreatment: early successes and continuing challenges.
Lind, Katherine T;Osborne, Christina M;Badesch, Brittany;Blood, Alyssa;Lowenstein, Steven R;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 1690846
334 views DOI Abstract
2019
Learning medical professionalism - the application of appreciative inquiry and social media.
Hsieh, Jyh-Gang;Kuo, Li-Chuan;Wang, Ying-Wei;
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 1586507
329 views DOI Abstract
2010
Out of Our Heads! Four perspectives on the curation of an on-line exhibition of medically themed artwork by UK medical undergraduates
Thompson, Trevor;Klee, Danny van de;Lamont-Robinson, Catherine;Duffin, Will;
Vol. 15 , pp. 1-6
317 views Abstract
2020
Evaluation of surgical educational videos available for third year medical students.
Karic, Berina;Moino, Veronica;Nolin, Andrew;Andrews, Ashley;Brisson, Paul;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 1714197
306 views DOI Abstract
View All 17 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.