Indexed in Journament

Medical Education Online

ISSN 1087-2981· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,903 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
17 Articles
Scores higher than 79.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Medical Education Online
Abbreviated Name medical education online
ISSN 1087-2981

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 20.0
Diversity 25.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.0
Content Distribution 64.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility — 19.1
Timeliness 20.0 9.2
Diversity 25.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 10.0 7.8
Content Distribution 64.9 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2019
Development of an empathy and clarity rating scale to measure the effect of medical improv on end-of-first-year OCSE performance: a pilot study.
Terregino, Carol A;Copeland, H Liesel;Sarfaty, Suzanne C;Lantz-Gefroh, Valeri;Hoffmann-Longtin, Krista;
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 1666537
436 views DOI Abstract
2020
Medical students' motivation and academic performance: the mediating roles of self-efficacy and learning engagement.
Wu, Hongbin;Li, Shan;Zheng, Juan;Guo, Jianru;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 1742964
432 views DOI Abstract
2016
From PBL tutoring to PBL coaching in undergraduate medical education: an interpretative phenomenological analysis study.
Wang, Qing;Li, Huiping;Pang, Weiguo;
Vol. 21 , pp. 31973
409 views DOI Abstract
2017
The relevance and role of homestays in medical education: a scoping study.
Hughes, Bonnie Olivia;Moshabela, Mosa;Owen, Jenni;Gaede, Bernhard;
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 1320185
397 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evaluation of the effectiveness of student learning and teacher instruction on team-based learning during quality control of diagnostic imaging.
Tsai, Meng-Fang;Jao, Jo-Chi;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 1732159
383 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ending student mistreatment: early successes and continuing challenges.
Lind, Katherine T;Osborne, Christina M;Badesch, Brittany;Blood, Alyssa;Lowenstein, Steven R;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 1690846
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
A 360-degree assessment of teaching effectiveness using a structured-videorecorded observed teaching exercise for faculty development.
Jones, Christopher A;Watkins, Franklin S;Williams, Julie;Lambros, Ann;Callahan, Kathryn E;Lawlor, Janice;Williamson, Jeff D;High, Kevin P;Atkinson, Hal H;
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 1596708
364 views DOI Abstract
2019
Learning medical professionalism - the application of appreciative inquiry and social media.
Hsieh, Jyh-Gang;Kuo, Li-Chuan;Wang, Ying-Wei;
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 1586507
359 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evaluation of surgical educational videos available for third year medical students.
Karic, Berina;Moino, Veronica;Nolin, Andrew;Andrews, Ashley;Brisson, Paul;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 1714197
342 views DOI Abstract
2010
Out of Our Heads! Four perspectives on the curation of an on-line exhibition of medically themed artwork by UK medical undergraduates
Thompson, Trevor;Klee, Danny van de;Lamont-Robinson, Catherine;Duffin, Will;
Vol. 15 , pp. 1-6
342 views Abstract
2023
The future of medical education and research: Is ChatGPT a blessing or blight in disguise?
Arif, T.B.
Vol. 28 , pp. 0-0
102 views DOI
2021
Environments, processes, and outcomes - using the LEPO framework to examine medical student learning preferences with traditional and electronic resources
Wong, Kristin;Kapoor, Vidhi;Tso, Alan;OConnor, Mary;Convissar, David;Kothari, Neil;Traba, Christin;
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. -
64 views Abstract
2020
Medical students' motivation and academic performance: the mediating roles of self-efficacy and learning engagement.
Wu, Hongbin;Li, Shan;Zheng, Juan;Guo, Jianru;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 1742964
432 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evaluation of the effectiveness of student learning and teacher instruction on team-based learning during quality control of diagnostic imaging.
Tsai, Meng-Fang;Jao, Jo-Chi;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 1732159
383 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evaluation of surgical educational videos available for third year medical students.
Karic, Berina;Moino, Veronica;Nolin, Andrew;Andrews, Ashley;Brisson, Paul;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 1714197
342 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ending student mistreatment: early successes and continuing challenges.
Lind, Katherine T;Osborne, Christina M;Badesch, Brittany;Blood, Alyssa;Lowenstein, Steven R;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 1690846
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of an empathy and clarity rating scale to measure the effect of medical improv on end-of-first-year OCSE performance: a pilot study.
Terregino, Carol A;Copeland, H Liesel;Sarfaty, Suzanne C;Lantz-Gefroh, Valeri;Hoffmann-Longtin, Krista;
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 1666537
436 views DOI Abstract
2019
A novel curriculum to train physician assistant students how to write effective discharge summaries
Zietlow, K.
Vol. 24 , pp. 1648944
184 views DOI
2019
A 360-degree assessment of teaching effectiveness using a structured-videorecorded observed teaching exercise for faculty development.
Jones, Christopher A;Watkins, Franklin S;Williams, Julie;Lambros, Ann;Callahan, Kathryn E;Lawlor, Janice;Williamson, Jeff D;High, Kevin P;Atkinson, Hal H;
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 1596708
364 views DOI Abstract
2019
Learning medical professionalism - the application of appreciative inquiry and social media.
Hsieh, Jyh-Gang;Kuo, Li-Chuan;Wang, Ying-Wei;
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 1586507
359 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,903 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

25.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

64.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.