Indexed in Journament

surfaces and interfaces

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,850 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
39 Articles
Scores higher than 11.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name surfaces and interfaces
Abbreviated Name surfaces and interfaces

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 43.5
Community Impact 2.1
Content Distribution 83.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.1
Accessibility — 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 43.5 31.2
Community Impact 2.1 13.4
Content Distribution 83.7 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (39)

2015
the disa-umh study: a prospective cohort study in health science students from miguel hernández university
;Eva María Navarrete-Muñoz;Desirée Valera-Gran;Sandra Gonzalez-Palacios;Manoli García de la Hera;Daniel Gimenez-Monzo;Laura Torres-Collado;Jesus Vioque
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 69-76
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nanopore structures, surface morphology, and adsorption capacity of tabah bamboo-activated carbons
Negara D.
Vol. 16 , pp. 22-28
362 views DOI
2019
bioaccesibilidad de minerales en alimentos elaborados con premezclas comerciales libres de gluten
;Maria Julieta Binaghi;Luis Marcelo Dyner;Laura Beatriz Lopez
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 65-75
329 views DOI Abstract
2014
can flaxseed help satisfy appetite in women subjected to bariatric surgery?
;Gigliane Cosendey-Menegati;Larissa Cohen;Fernanda Cristina Carvalho-de-Mattos;Mariana Paes-de-Miranda;Eliane Lopes-Rosado
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 54-60
329 views DOI Abstract
2017
analysis of the overweight and obesity trend in the peruvian population
;Carolina Tarqui-Mamani;Doris Alvarez-Dongo;Paula Lita Espinoza-Oriundo;Jose Ramon Sanchez-Abanto
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 137-147
311 views DOI Abstract
2013
effect of social inequalities in the prevalence of obesity
;Iva Marques-Lopes
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 45-46
303 views DOI
2015
effects of oat beta-glucan intake on blood cholesterol: a review
;Aránzazu Aparicio Vizuete;Rosa María Ortega Anta
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 127-139
299 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hydrogen physisorption on nitrogen-doped graphene and graphene-like boron nitride-carbon heterostructures: a DFT study
Petrushenko, I.
Vol. 17 , pp. 0-0
285 views DOI
2016
comentario de quiroz-acurio v en: valoración nutricional, evaluación de la composición corporal y su relación con el rendimiento deportivo en un equipo de fútbol femenino
;Kevyn Arias;Valeria Quiroz-Acurio;Alexandra Rivera
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. 246-247
279 views DOI
2013
association between diet and presence of overweight and obesity. dietary assessment method of the spanish national health survey 2006
;Aurora Isabel Norte-Navarro;Rocío Ortiz-Moncada;José Fernández-Sáez;Carlos Álvarez-Dardet
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 102-109
276 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effect of cerium on the physicochemical and anticorrosive features of TEOS-GPTMS sol-gel coatings deposited on the AZ31 magnesium alloy
Hernández-Barrios, C.A.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
247 views DOI
2020
Synthesis, characterization and corrosion inhibition potential of newly benzimidazole derivatives: Combining theoretical and experimental study
Rouifi, Z.
Vol. 18 , pp. 0-0
196 views DOI
2020
Structural and optical properties of hematite and L-arginine/hematite nanostructures prepared by thermal spray pyrolysis
Nyarige, J.
Vol. 18 , pp. 0-0
259 views DOI
2020
Synthetic approach of organic acid assisted δ-Al<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> nanorods toward engineering surface chemistry
Arunarajeswari, P.
Vol. 18 , pp. 0-0
160 views DOI
2019
relación entre ácidos grasos omega-3/omega-6 presentes en la dieta y enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal: scoping review
;Ana Gutierrez-Hervás;Sofía García-Sanjuán;Sandra Gil-Varela;Ángela Sanjuán-Quiles
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 92-103
251 views DOI Abstract
2019
bioaccesibilidad de minerales en alimentos elaborados con premezclas comerciales libres de gluten
;Maria Julieta Binaghi;Luis Marcelo Dyner;Laura Beatriz Lopez
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 65-75
329 views DOI Abstract
2019
Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using bitter leave (Veronica amygdalina) for antibacterial activities
Aisida, S.
Vol. 17 , pp. 0-0
229 views DOI
2019
Hydrogen physisorption on nitrogen-doped graphene and graphene-like boron nitride-carbon heterostructures: a DFT study
Petrushenko, I.
Vol. 17 , pp. 0-0
285 views DOI
2019
A comparative study of structural and photocatalytic mechanism of AgGaO<inf>2</inf> nanocomposites for equilibrium and kinetics evaluation of adsorption parameters
Alhaji, N.
Vol. 17 , pp. 0-0
205 views DOI
2019
Raman investigations on gamma irradiated iPP-VGCNF nanocomposites: The polymer's tale
Chipara, D.
Vol. 17 , pp. 0-0
208 views DOI
Journament Score
28.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,850 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

28.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

43.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

83.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.