The journal of contemporary dental practice | Journament

Journal Ranking

#9281 / 33,987
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

The journal of contemporary dental practice

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name J Contemp Dent Pract
Abbreviated Name j contemp dent pract
ISSN 1526-3711
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

2019
Remineralizing Effect of Casein Phosphopeptide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate and Sodium Fluoride on Artificial Tooth Enamel Erosion: An Study.
Pirca, Kevin;Balbín-Sedano, Gabriela;Romero-Tapia, Percy;Alvitez-Temoche, Daniel;Robles, Gareth;Mayta-Tovalino, Frank;
Vol. 20 , No. 11 , pp. 1254-1259
361 views Abstract
2019
Development of New Experimental Dentifrice of Peruvian (Tocosh) Fermented by Water Stress: Antibacterial and Cytotoxic Activity.
Mayta-Tovalino, Frank;Sedano-Balbin, Gabriela;Romero-Tapia, Percy;Alvítez-Temoche, Daniel;Álvarez-Paucar, María;Gálvez-Calla, Luis;Sacsaquispe-Contreras, Sonia;
Vol. 20 , No. 10 , pp. 1206-1211
324 views Abstract
2019
Color Stability of Microhybrid and Nanofilled Composite Resins: Effect of Surface Sealant Agents Containing Different Filler Content.
Muhittin, Ugurlu;Burak, Temel U;Kam, Hepdeniz O;
Vol. 20 , No. 9 , pp. 1045-1050
323 views Abstract
2004
The comparison of the thickness of the cementum layer in Type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients.
Gokhan, Kamer;Keklikoglu, Nurullah;Buyukertan, Mete;
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 124-33
316 views Abstract
2020
Are Bioceramics the Dernier Cri in the Management of Stage 4 Developed Root? A Finite Element Analysis.
Sharma, Sonali;Londhe, Sanjay M;Hegde, Mithra N;Sadananda, Vandana;
Vol. 21 , No. 9 , pp. 961-969
251 views Abstract
2019
A Comparison of Thermal Changes among Four Different Interproximal Reduction Systems in Orthodontics.
Omer, Amina Balla Al-Hassan;Sanea, Jamal Al;
Vol. 20 , No. 6 , pp. 738-742
222 views Abstract
2019
Similarity Index Analysis of the Manuscript: A Viewpoint.
Gondivkar, Shailesh M;Sarode, Sachin C;Gadbail, Amol R;Sarode, Gargi S;Patil, Shankargouda;
Vol. 20 , No. 10 , pp. 1125
221 views Abstract
2019
Potential Role of Machine Learning in Oncology.
Kumar, S Satish;Awan, Kamran H;Patil, Shankargouda;Sk, Indu Bharkavi;Raj, A Thirumal;
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 529-530
186 views Abstract
2015
formality and the lefschetz property in symplectic and cosymplectic geometry
;Bazzoni Giovanni;Fernández Marisa;Muñoz Vicente
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. -
174 views DOI Abstract
2022
Epidemiology of Facial Profiles, Occlusal Features, and Orthodontic Treatment Need among Adolescence: A Cross-sectional Study.
Alhadad, Abdulwahab;Aldhorae, Khalid;Al Moaleem, Mohammed M;Al-Labani, Mohammed A;Kofiyh, Kadejh A;ALjawfi, Khalid;Abdulrab, Ali Mohammed M;Alraawi, Mohammed A;Alshakhs, Nour M;Alqahtani, Muqbil S;Altawili, Zainab M;
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 313-319
119 views Abstract
View All 12 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.