renewable energy | Journament

Journal Ranking

#447 / 33,950
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

renewable energy

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name renewable energy
Abbreviated Name renewable energy
ISSN 0960-1481
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (437 total)

2015
relationship between different cardiovascular risk scores and measures of subclinical atherosclerosis in an indian population
;Manish Bansal;Ravi R. Kasliwal;Naresh Trehan
Vol. 67 , No. 4 , pp. 332-340
647 views DOI Abstract
2016
comparative analysis of biochemical parameters in diabetic and non-diabetic acute myocardial infarction patients
;Fatima Ali;Syed Ali Shabaz Naqvi;Mehwish Bismillah;Nadia Wajid
Vol. 68 , No. 3 , pp. 325-331
532 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ethyl esters biodiesel production from Spirulina sp. and Nannochloropsis oculata microalgal lipids over alumina-calcium oxide catalyst
Turkkul, B.
Vol. 145 , pp. 1014-1019
414 views DOI
2017
predictors of no- reflow during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction, from medical college hospital, trivandrum
;Padmajan Sabin;Alummoottil George Koshy;Prabha Nini Gupta;Pattu Valappil Sanjai;Kunjukrishanpilla Sivaprasad;Praveen Velappan;Radhakrishnan Vellikat Velayudhan
Vol. 69 , No. S1 , pp. S34-S45
390 views DOI Abstract
2016
rising trend of cardiovascular risk factors between 1991–1994 and 2010–2012: a repeat cross sectional survey in urban and rural vellore
;Anu Mary Oommen;Vinod Joseph Abraham;Kuryan George;V. Jacob Jose
Vol. 68 , No. 3 , pp. 263-269
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Catalytic hydrodeoxygenation of crude bio-oil in supercritical methanol using supported nickel catalysts
Shafaghat, H.
, pp. 159-166
375 views DOI
2019
Oleaginous yeast biomass flocculation using bioflocculant produced in wastewater sludge and transesterification using petroleum diesel as a co-solvent
Yellapu, S.
Vol. 131 , pp. 217-228
369 views DOI
2017
the design and rationale of the primary angioplasty registry of kerala
;Jabir A;Anoop Mathew;Sunitha Viswanathan;Ashraf S M;Placid Sebastian;Prasannakumar C K;George Koshy A;Sunil Pisharody;Rony Mathew;L. Jeyasheelan
Vol. 69 , No. 6 , pp. 777-783
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fast pyrolysis of biomass in a spouted bed reactor: Hydrodynamics, heat transfer and chemical reaction
Park, H.
, pp. 1268-1284
340 views DOI
2019
Biodiesel production from used cooking oil using green solid catalyst derived from calcined fusion waste chicken and fish bones
Tan Y.
, pp. 696-706
338 views DOI
View All 437 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.