journal of environmental health science & engineering | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1224 / 33,955
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of environmental health science & engineering

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim
Short Name j environ health sci eng
Abbreviated Name j environ health sci eng
ISSN 2052-336X
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/40201
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (27 total)

2014
integrated cost model for improving the production in companies
;Zuzana Hajduova
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 90-99
490 views DOI Abstract
2019
Atenolol adsorption onto multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified by NaOCl and ultrasonic treatment; kinetic, isotherm, thermodynamic, and artificial neural network modeling.
Dehdashti, Bahare;Amin, Mohammad Mehdi;Gholizadeh, Abdolmajid;Miri, Mohammad;Rafati, Lida;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 281-293
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparative study of predicting hospital solid waste generation using multiple linear regression and artificial intelligence.
Golbaz, Somayeh;Nabizadeh, Ramin;Sajadi, Haniye Sadat;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 41-51
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Levels and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water and fish of Rivers Niger and Benue confluence Lokoja, Nigeria.
Ekere, Nwachukwu Romanus;Yakubu, Newman Monday;Oparanozie, Tochukwu;Ihedioha, Janefrances Ngozi;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 383-392
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
A comparative study for removal of cadmium(II) ions using unmodified and NTA-modified charcoal powder.
Saini, Saraswati;Katnoria, Jatinder Kaur;Kaur, Inderpreet;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 259-272
329 views DOI Abstract
2011
effectiveness evaluation of service provided in geology: introduction of a pilot project eesg
;Markéta Lajczyková
Vol. 14 , No. 1-2 , pp. 20-33
293 views DOI Abstract
2020
The investigation of biological removal of nitrogen and phosphorous from domestic wastewater by inserting anaerobic/anoxic holding tank in the return sludge line of MLE-OSA modified system.
Nikpour, Behzad;Jalilzadeh Yengejeh, R;Takdastan, A;Hassani, A H;Zazouli, M A;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
283 views DOI Abstract
2019
Discrimination of aerosol types over the Tehran city using 5 years (2011-2015) of MODIS collection 6 aerosol products.
Rezaei, Mohammad;Farajzadeh, Manuchehr;Mielonen, Tero;Ghavidel, Yosef;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
282 views DOI Abstract
2019
Developing environmental health indicators [EHIs] for Iran based on the causal effect model.
Maroosi, Mohammad;Mesdaghinia, Alireza;Alimohammadi, Mahmood;Naddafi, Kazem;Mahvi, Amir Hossein;Nabizadeh Nodehi, Ramin;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 273-279
280 views DOI Abstract
2011
suggestions for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of quality management in the business practice in slovakia
;Dagmar Rusková;Jaromíra Vaňová;Marta Kučerová
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 9-17
264 views Abstract
View All 27 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.