journal of modern power systems and clean energy | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6990 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
85
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of modern power systems and clean energy

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name journal of modern power systems and clean energy
Abbreviated Name journal of modern power systems and clean energy
ISSN 2196-5625
Aim and Scope
URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=8685265
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (25 total)

2016
Improving the performance of power system protection using wide area monitoring systems
Arun G. PHADKE;Peter WALL;Lei DING;Vladimir TERZIJA;Arun G. PHADKE;Peter WALL;Lei DING;Vladimir TERZIJA;
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 319-331
317 views DOI Abstract
2019
Erratum to: Wind power forecasting based on outlier smooth transition autoregressive GARCH model (Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, (2018), 6, 3, (532-539), 10.1007/s40565-016-0226-3)
Chen, H.
Vol. 7 , pp. 1749
306 views DOI
2018
Cyber-secure decentralized energy management for IoT-enabled active distribution networks
LI, Zhiyi;SHAHIDEHPOUR, Mohammad;LIU, Xuan;
Vol. 6 , No. 5 , pp. 900-917
299 views Abstract
2017
State-of-the-art review on frequency response of wind power plants in power systems
WU, Ziping;GAO, Wenzhong;GAO, Tianqi;YAN, Weihang;ZHANG, Huaguang;YAN, Shijie;WANG, Xiao;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-16
278 views Abstract
2017
Review of Middle East energy interconnection development
ZHANG, Xiao-Ping;OU, Mingyu;SONG, Yanmin;LI, Xiaolu;
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. 917-935
243 views Abstract
2026
Optimization of airfoil geometry using the NSGA-II method to improve the performance and efficiency of a very low head turbine
Ridwan Arief Subekti, Fazila Mohd-Zawawi, Kamarulafizam Ismail, Derren Audric Sudarto, Muhammad Lucky Witjaksono, Qidun Maulana Binu Soesanto, Anjar Susatyo, Henny Sudibyo, Ahmad Fudholi, Rudi Darussalam
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
Green energy skills and AI in the UK
Terence Cook, David Elliott
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
Numerical Investigation of Hydrogen Co-Firing in Gas Turbine Combustors: Emission, Performance, and Economic Feasibility
Hadits Shofar Fauzi, Gea Fardias Mu’min, Vani Virdyawan, Firman Bagja Juangsa
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
Review on Ejector-Integrated Compressed Gas Energy Storage System
Haoran Chen, Junjie Di, Yundou Bai, Xingping Shi, Qing He
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
Artificial Intelligence in Materials Research: Toward a Sustainable Future
Zhijie Fu
5 views DOI Abstract
View All 25 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
85
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

85.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.