Indexed in Journament

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)

ISSN 2075-4418· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.7/100
Journament Score
#9,284
Journament Rank
16
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Diagnostics (Basel)
Abbreviated Name diagnostics (basel)
ISSN 2075-4418
URL http://www.mdpi.com/journal/diagnostics

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2019
Liver Fibrosis Assessment with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Value of Liver Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Normalization Using the Spleen as a Reference Organ.
Vol. 9 , No. 3
429 views DOI Abstract
2019
Increased Serum Parathyroid Hormone, Osteocalcin and Alkaline Phosphatase Are Associated with a Long-Term Adverse Cardiovascular Outcome after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.
Vol. 9 , No. 4
418 views DOI Abstract
2019
Phospholipids are A Potentially Important Source of Tissue Biomarkers for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results of a Pilot Study Involving Targeted Metabolomics.
Vol. 9 , No. 4
415 views DOI Abstract
2019
Setup of Quantitative PCR for Oral spp. Evaluation in Celiac Disease Diagnosis.
Vol. 10 , No. 1
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Design and Benchmark Testing for Open Architecture Reconfigurable Mobile Spirometer and Exhaled Breath Monitor with GPS and Data Telemetry.
Vol. 9 , No. 3
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes-Progress and Perspectives.
Vol. 9 , No. 3
347 views DOI Abstract
2020
Papillary Thyroid Cancer in a Struma Ovarii in a 17-Year-Old Nulliparous Patient: A case Report.
Vol. 10 , No. 1
346 views DOI Abstract
2020
Diagnostics of Melanocytic Skin Tumours by a Combination of Ultrasonic, Dermatoscopic and Spectrophotometric Image Parameters.
Vol. 10 , No. 9
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reiber's Diagram for Kappa Free Light Chains: The New Standard for Assessing Intrathecal Synthesis?
Vol. 9 , No. 4
330 views DOI Abstract
2020
Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence Technology for Novel Coronavirus Disease-19 Self-Testing.
Vol. 10 , No. 4
294 views DOI Abstract
2025
Automatic Feature Selection for Imbalanced Echocardiogram Data Using Event-Based Self-Similarity.
Vol. 15
20 views DOI Abstract
2025
The Contribution of Real-Time Artificial Intelligence Segmentation in Maxillofacial Trauma Emergencies.
Vol. 15
46 views DOI Abstract
2025
A Rare Case of Xeroderma Pigmentosum: Nivolumab Treatment for Three Cutaneous Malignancies with Clinical and Metabolic Imaging Correlation.
Vol. 15
57 views DOI Abstract
2025
Clinicopathologic Analysis of Five Patients with -Mutated Colorectal Cancer in a Single Korean Institute.
Vol. 15
58 views DOI Abstract
2025
Exposed Necrotic Bone in a Head and Neck Cancer Patient: Report of a Diagnostic Challenge.
Vol. 15
77 views DOI Abstract
2023
Differential Protein Expression Patterns of HOXA13 and HOXB13 Are Associated with Bladder Cancer Progression.
Vol. 13 , No. 16
82 views DOI Abstract
2020
Diagnostics of Melanocytic Skin Tumours by a Combination of Ultrasonic, Dermatoscopic and Spectrophotometric Image Parameters.
Vol. 10 , No. 9
340 views DOI Abstract
2020
Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence Technology for Novel Coronavirus Disease-19 Self-Testing.
Vol. 10 , No. 4
294 views DOI Abstract
2020
Papillary Thyroid Cancer in a Struma Ovarii in a 17-Year-Old Nulliparous Patient: A case Report.
Vol. 10 , No. 1
346 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reiber's Diagram for Kappa Free Light Chains: The New Standard for Assessing Intrathecal Synthesis?
Vol. 9 , No. 4
330 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.