materials & design | Journament

Journal Ranking

#725 / 33,943
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

materials & design

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name materials & design
Abbreviated Name materials & design
ISSN 0264-1275
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.journals.elsevier.com/materials-and-design
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (88 total)

2015
Design and fabrication of functionally graded in-situ aluminium composites for automotive pistons
Arsha, A.G.;Jayakumar, E.;Rajan, T.P.D.;Antony, V.;Pai, B.C.;
Vol. 88 , pp. 1201-1209
542 views Abstract
2003
consultation computer use to improve management of chronic disease in general practice: a before and after study
;Elizabeth Mitchell;Alex McConnachie;Frank Sullivan
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 61-68
533 views DOI Abstract
2013
the provision and impact of online patient access to their electronic health records (ehr) and transactional services on the quality and safety of health care: systematic review protocol
;Freda Mold;Beverley Ellis;Simon de Lusignan;Aziz Sheikh;Jeremy C Wyatt;Mary Cavill;Georgios Michalakidis;Fiona Barker;Azeem Majeed;Tom Quinn;Phil Koczan;Theo Avanitis;Toto Anne Gronlund;Christina Franco;Mary McCarthy;Zoe Renton;Umesh Chauhan;Hannah Blakey;Neha Kataria;Simon Jones;Imran Rafi
Vol. 20 , No. 4 , pp. 271-282
509 views DOI Abstract
2010
quality assessment of information about medications in primary care electronic patient record (epr) systems
;Maria Pous;Marco Camporese;Alessandro Nobili;Serena Frau;Francesco DelZotti;Anita Conforti;Roberta Zimol;Guido Giustetto;Giulia Zermiani;Giuseppe Lombardo;Luigi Mezzalira
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 109-116
473 views DOI Abstract
2010
quality indicators to measure blood pressure management over a time interval
;Thusitha Mabotuwana;Jim Warren;Raina Elley;John Kennelly;Chris Paton;Kuinileti Wai;Stewart Wells
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 149-156
462 views DOI Abstract
2013
the scottish emergency care summary – an evaluation of a national shared record system aiming to improve patient care: technology report
;Libby MM Morris;Colin Brown;Marysia Williamson;Jeremy C Wyatt
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 41-49
446 views DOI Abstract
2017
Friction spot welding between porous TC4 titanium alloy and ultra high molecular weight polyethylene
Chen, Ke;Chen, Binxi;Zhang, Shanyong;Wang, Min;Zhang, Lanting;Shan, Aidang;
Vol. 132 , pp. 178-187
408 views Abstract
2017
Exceptional texture evolution induced by multi-pass cold drawing of magnesium alloy
Sun, Liuxia;Bai, Jing;Xue, Feng;Tao, Li;Chu, Chenglin;Meng, Jiao;
Vol. 135 , pp. 267-274
408 views Abstract
2007
uk and croatia: family practice, its medical records and computerisation in the context of an enlarged europe
;Simon de Lusignan;Milica Kati_
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 169-173
404 views DOI Abstract
2018
Molecular dynamics-based cohesive zone representation of Ti6Al4V/TiC composite interface
Elkhateeb, Mohamed G.;Shin, Yung C.;
Vol. 155 , pp. 161-169
400 views Abstract
View All 88 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.