Indexed in Journament

materials & design

ISSN 0264-1275· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #15,436 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
88 Articles
Scores higher than 47.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name materials & design
Abbreviated Name materials & design
ISSN 0264-1275
URL http://www.journals.elsevier.com/materials-and-design

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.0
Content Distribution 68.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for materials & design
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.2
Accessibility 20.0 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 28.3
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 5.0 11.5
Content Distribution 68.8 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (88)

2003
consultation computer use to improve management of chronic disease in general practice: a before and after study
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 61-68
603 views DOI Abstract
2015
Design and fabrication of functionally graded in-situ aluminium composites for automotive pistons
Vol. 88 , pp. 1201-1209
582 views Abstract
2013
the provision and impact of online patient access to their electronic health records (ehr) and transactional services on the quality and safety of health care: systematic review protocol
Vol. 20 , No. 4 , pp. 271-282
569 views DOI Abstract
2010
quality assessment of information about medications in primary care electronic patient record (epr) systems
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 109-116
524 views DOI Abstract
2010
quality indicators to measure blood pressure management over a time interval
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 149-156
509 views DOI Abstract
2013
the scottish emergency care summary – an evaluation of a national shared record system aiming to improve patient care: technology report
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 41-49
479 views DOI Abstract
2017
Exceptional texture evolution induced by multi-pass cold drawing of magnesium alloy
Vol. 135 , pp. 267-274
457 views Abstract
2016
Slag recycling in submerged arc welding and its effects on the quality of stainless steel claddings
Vol. 108 , pp. 689-698
451 views Abstract
2007
uk and croatia: family practice, its medical records and computerisation in the context of an enlarged europe
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 169-173
449 views DOI Abstract
2017
Friction spot welding between porous TC4 titanium alloy and ultra high molecular weight polyethylene
Vol. 132 , pp. 178-187
444 views Abstract
2020
Facile preparation of Ce enhanced vinyl-functionalized silica aerogel-like monoliths for selective separation of radioactive thorium from monazite
Vol. 186 , pp. -
226 views Abstract
2019
Design of a new Al-Cu alloy manipulated by in-situ nanocrystals with superior high temperature tensile properties and its constitutive equation
Vol. 181 , pp. -
231 views Abstract
2019
Hybrid thermal stabilization of Zr doped nanocrystalline Cu
Vol. 164 , pp. -
191 views Abstract
2019
Functionally Graded Materials through robotics-inspired path planning
Vol. 182 , pp. -
285 views Abstract
2019
Exploiting thermal strain to achieve an in-situ magnetically graded material
Vol. 161 , pp. 14-21
195 views Abstract
2019
Hybrid CaCO3-mucin crystals: Effective approach for loading and controlled release of cationic drugs
Vol. 182 , pp. -
344 views Abstract
2019
Three-dimensional structure and formation mechanisms of Y2O3 hollow-precipitates in a Cu-based metallic glass
Vol. 168 , pp. -
230 views Abstract
2019
Critical thickness of GaN film in controllable stress-induced self-separation for preparing native GaN substrates
Vol. 180 , pp. -
207 views Abstract
Journament Score
33.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #15,436 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

33.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

68.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.