Indexed in Journament

süleyman demirel Üniversitesi fen bilimleri enstitüsü dergisi

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #9,755 of 29,297 scored journals (34,026 indexed)
24 Articles
Scores higher than 66.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name süleyman demirel Üniversitesi fen bilimleri enstitüsü dergisi
Abbreviated Name süleyman demirel Üniversitesi fen bilimleri enstitüsü dergisi

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.9
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 67.5
Community Impact 8.6
Content Distribution 60.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for süleyman demirel Üniversitesi fen bilimleri enstitüsü dergisi
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.5
Accessibility — 23.0
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity — 25.9
Innovation 67.5 24.1
Community Impact 8.6 5.7
Content Distribution 60.1 89.4
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (24)

2009
Isparta İlinde Ambalajsız Dondurmaların Kalite Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. -
483 views Abstract
2019
Hazır Giyim Üretiminde Kullanılan Dikiş Türlerinin Aerobik Mezofilik Bakteri Büyümesine Etkisi
Vol. 23 , pp. 94-98
436 views Abstract
2016
2014
Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Yerleşkesinin Gürültü Haritalarının Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri ile Hazırlanması
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. -
338 views Abstract
2014
Yansıma ve Yüzey Dalgaları Metotları ile İnsan Yapımı Tünel Yerinin Bulunması, SDÜ Kampüs Örneği-Isparta
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. -
337 views Abstract
2014
Türkiye'de Nasıl Bir Üniversite Eğitimi Uygulanmalı?
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. -
325 views Abstract
2017
Sulu Ortamlardan Modifiye Edilmiş Toz Arıtma Çamuru Kullanılarak Toryum Metalinin Biyosorpsiyon ile Gideriminde İzoterm ve Kinetik Analizi
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 623-630
312 views Abstract
2014
S.D.Ü. Bilgi Merkezi'nde Radon Ölçümleri
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. -
298 views Abstract
2016
Isıl İşlem Görmüş Ladin ve Dişbudak Odunlarının Mikroskobik Görüntüleri Üzerine Değerlendirmeler
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 414-420
295 views Abstract
2019
Hazır Giyim Üretiminde Kullanılan Dikiş Türlerinin Aerobik Mezofilik Bakteri Büyümesine Etkisi
Vol. 23 , pp. 94-98
436 views Abstract
2018
Atık Portakal Kabuklarıyla Baskılı Devre Kartlarından Paladyum Adsorpsiyonu
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 201-206
47 views Abstract
2018
Nitro Piridin Halkasının Nükleofilik Sübstitüsyonundan Elde Edilen İki Yeni Enerjik Malzemenin Termal İncelenmesi, Termokinetik Analizi ve Antimikrobiyal Aktivitesi
Vol. 22 , No. 3 , pp. 1262-1275
71 views Abstract
2017
İnteraktif ve Web Tabanlı Genetik Algoritma Eğitim Yazılımı
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. 928-934
92 views Abstract
2017
Sulu Ortamlardan Modifiye Edilmiş Toz Arıtma Çamuru Kullanılarak Toryum Metalinin Biyosorpsiyon ile Gideriminde İzoterm ve Kinetik Analizi
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 623-630
312 views Abstract
2016
Antalya İlinde Portakal Bahçelerinde Gözlenen Önemli Zararlı ve Yararlı Böcek Popülasyonları
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. -
59 views Abstract
2016
Eğirdir Gölü Mikrobiyoloji Kalitesinin Mevsimsel Değişimi
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. -
179 views Abstract
Journament Score
34.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #9,755 of 29,297 scored
(34,026 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

34.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

67.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

60.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.