Indexed in Journament

regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : rtp

ISSN 1096-0295· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.2 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #4,415 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
111 Articles
Scores higher than 84.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

ชื่อย่อ regul toxicol pharmacol
ชื่อตัวย่อ regul toxicol pharmacol
ISSN 1096-0295
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/regulatory-toxicology-and-pharmacology

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 60.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 3.6
Content Distribution 63.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 60.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 3.6 13.4
Content Distribution 63.7 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (111)

2018
neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants with very low birth weights are associated with the severity of their extra-uterine growth retardation
;Han-Chun Chien;Chao-Huei Chen;Teh-Ming Wang;Ya-Chi Hsu;Ming-Chih Lin
Vol. 59 , No. 2 , pp. 168-175
655 views Abstract
2006
Risk and safety assessment on the consumption of Licorice root (Glycyrrhiza sp.), its extract and powder as a food ingredient, with emphasis on the pharmacology and toxicology of glycyrrhizin.
Isbrucker, R A;Burdock, G A;
Vol. 46 , No. 3 , pp. 167-92
500 views Abstract
2018
a 12-year-experience with tracheostomy for neonates and infants in northern taiwan: indications, hospital courses, and long-term outcomes
;Chia-Huei Chen;Jui-Hsing Chang;Chyong-Hsin Hsu;Nan-Chang Chiu;Chun-Chin Peng;Wai-Tim Jim;Hung-Yang Chang;Kuo-Sheng Lee
Vol. 59 , No. 2 , pp. 141-146
494 views Abstract
2019
Residue behavior and dietary risk assessment of chlorothalonil and its metabolite SDS-3701 in water spinach to propose maximum residue limit (MRL).
Lin, Hongfang;Zhao, Shengming;Fan, Xueqi;Ma, Yecheng;Wu, Xingling;Su, Yue;Hu, Jiye;
, pp. 104416
483 views DOI Abstract
2020
Regulations for calcium, magnesium or hardness in drinking water in the European Union member states.
Kozisek, Frantisek;
, pp. 104589
472 views DOI Abstract
2018
association of preterm birth and small for gestational age with metabolic outcomes in children and adolescents: a population-based cohort study from taiwan
;Yu-Ting Huang;Hsiang-Yu Lin;Chung-Hsing Wang;Bai-Horng Su;Che-Chen Lin
Vol. 59 , No. 2 , pp. 147-153
467 views Abstract
2020
Pulmonary toxicity of silver vapours, nanoparticles and fine dusts: A review.
Hadrup, Niels;Sharma, Anoop K;Loeschner, Katrin;Jacobsen, Nicklas R;
, pp. 104690
440 views DOI Abstract
2019
Consumer safety evaluation of pyraclostrobin residues in strawberry using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS): An Egyptian profile.
Malhat, Farag;Saber, El-Sayed;Elsalam Shokr, Shokr Abd;Ahmed, Mohamed Tawfic;El-Sayed Amin, Alaa;
, pp. 104450
421 views DOI Abstract
2019
The accessibility of data on environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals - are environmental risk assessments information on emissions with respect to international and European environmental information law?
Oelkers, Kim;
, pp. 104571
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Molecular fingerprint-derived similarity measures for toxicological read-across: Recommendations for optimal use.
Mellor, C L;Marchese Robinson, R L;Benigni, R;Ebbrell, D;Enoch, S J;Firman, J W;Madden, J C;Pawar, G;Yang, C;Cronin, M T D;
Vol. 101 , pp. 121-134
401 views DOI Abstract
2025
A tool to support food substance safety evaluations in the United States.
Crincoli, Christine M; van de Ligt, Jennifer L G; Eapen, Alex K; Pavel, Anthony T; Hanlon, Paul R; Almond-Abbate, Kelly; Haugabrooks, Esther; Hlywka, Jason; Lu, Vivian; de Mooij, Fleur; Pandis, Margaret; Peterson, Ross; Petrick, Jay S; Ranganathan, Padhma; Henderson, Rayetta G
Vol. 161 , pp. 105838
75 views DOI Abstract
2021
Carcinogenic assessment of cobalt-containing alloys in medical devices or cobalt in occupational settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of overall cancer risk from published epidemiologic studies
Zhang S;Holy CE;Eichenbaum G;Perkins LE;Hasgall P;Katz LB;Brown JR;Orlandini L;Fessel G;Nasseri-Aghbosh B;Egnot NS;Zhou M;Beech R;Marcello SR;Coplan PM;;
Vol. 125 , pp. -
261 views Abstract
2020
Pulmonary toxicity of silver vapours, nanoparticles and fine dusts: A review.
Hadrup, Niels;Sharma, Anoop K;Loeschner, Katrin;Jacobsen, Nicklas R;
, pp. 104690
440 views DOI Abstract
2020
Regulations for calcium, magnesium or hardness in drinking water in the European Union member states.
Kozisek, Frantisek;
, pp. 104589
472 views DOI Abstract
2019
Percutaneous permeability of 1-phenoxy-2-propanol, a preservative in cosmetics.
Lee, Jung Dae;Kim, Ji-Young;Jang, Hyun Jun;Lee, Byung-Mu;Kim, Kyu-Bong;
Vol. 103 , pp. 56-62
318 views DOI Abstract
2019
The accessibility of data on environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals - are environmental risk assessments information on emissions with respect to international and European environmental information law?
Oelkers, Kim;
, pp. 104571
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Molecular fingerprint-derived similarity measures for toxicological read-across: Recommendations for optimal use.
Mellor, C L;Marchese Robinson, R L;Benigni, R;Ebbrell, D;Enoch, S J;Firman, J W;Madden, J C;Pawar, G;Yang, C;Cronin, M T D;
Vol. 101 , pp. 121-134
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Finding synergies for the 3Rs - Repeated dose toxicity testing: Report from an EPAA partners' forum.
Laroche, Charles;Annys, Erwin;Bender, Hans;Botelho, Danielle;Botham, Phil;Brendler-Schwaab, Susanne;Clayton, Rick;Corvaro, Marco;Dal Negro, Gianni;Delannois, Frédérique;Dent, Matt;Desaintes, Christian;Desprez, Bertrand;Dhalluin, Stephane;Hartmann, Andreas;Hoffmann-Doerr, Simone;Hubesch, Bruno;Irizar, Amaia;Manou, Irene;Müller, Boris P;Nadzialek, Stephanie;Prieto, Pilar;Rasenberg, Mike;Roggeband, Rob;Rowan, Tim G;Schutte, Katrin;van de Water, Bob;Westmoreland, Carl;Whelan, Maurice;Wilschut, Annette;Zvonimir, Zvonar;Cronin, Mark T D;
, pp. 104470
206 views DOI Abstract
2019
Consumer safety evaluation of pyraclostrobin residues in strawberry using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS): An Egyptian profile.
Malhat, Farag;Saber, El-Sayed;Elsalam Shokr, Shokr Abd;Ahmed, Mohamed Tawfic;El-Sayed Amin, Alaa;
, pp. 104450
421 views DOI Abstract
2019
Residue behavior and dietary risk assessment of chlorothalonil and its metabolite SDS-3701 in water spinach to propose maximum residue limit (MRL).
Lin, Hongfang;Zhao, Shengming;Fan, Xueqi;Ma, Yecheng;Wu, Xingling;Su, Yue;Hu, Jiye;
, pp. 104416
483 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
42.2/100 · Below Average
Ranked #4,415 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

63.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.