regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : rtp | Journament

Journal Ranking

#25 / 33,718
⭐ Average
Overall Score
53.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
85
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
48
Community Impact
55
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 months ago

regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : rtp

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • βœ… Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • βœ… Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • βœ… No iframe limitations
  • βœ… Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • βœ… Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • βœ… Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name regul toxicol pharmacol
Abbreviated Name regul toxicol pharmacol
ISSN 1096-0295
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (111 total)

2018
neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants with very low birth weights are associated with the severity of their extra-uterine growth retardation
;Han-Chun Chien;Chao-Huei Chen;Teh-Ming Wang;Ya-Chi Hsu;Ming-Chih Lin
Vol. 59 , No. 2 , pp. 168-175
577 views Abstract
2018
a 12-year-experience with tracheostomy for neonates and infants in northern taiwan: indications, hospital courses, and long-term outcomes
;Chia-Huei Chen;Jui-Hsing Chang;Chyong-Hsin Hsu;Nan-Chang Chiu;Chun-Chin Peng;Wai-Tim Jim;Hung-Yang Chang;Kuo-Sheng Lee
Vol. 59 , No. 2 , pp. 141-146
412 views Abstract
2018
association of preterm birth and small for gestational age with metabolic outcomes inΒ children and adolescents: a population-based cohort study from taiwan
;Yu-Ting Huang;Hsiang-Yu Lin;Chung-Hsing Wang;Bai-Horng Su;Che-Chen Lin
Vol. 59 , No. 2 , pp. 147-153
397 views Abstract
2006
Risk and safety assessment on the consumption of Licorice root (Glycyrrhiza sp.), its extract and powder as a food ingredient, with emphasis on the pharmacology and toxicology of glycyrrhizin.
Isbrucker, R A;Burdock, G A;
Vol. 46 , No. 3 , pp. 167-92
387 views Abstract
2019
Residue behavior and dietary risk assessment of chlorothalonil and its metabolite SDS-3701 in water spinach to propose maximum residue limit (MRL).
Lin, Hongfang;Zhao, Shengming;Fan, Xueqi;Ma, Yecheng;Wu, Xingling;Su, Yue;Hu, Jiye;
, pp. 104416
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Consumer safety evaluation of pyraclostrobin residues in strawberry using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS): An Egyptian profile.
Malhat, Farag;Saber, El-Sayed;Elsalam Shokr, Shokr Abd;Ahmed, Mohamed Tawfic;El-Sayed Amin, Alaa;
, pp. 104450
323 views DOI Abstract
2019
The accessibility of data on environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals - are environmental risk assessments information on emissions with respect to international and European environmental information law?
Oelkers, Kim;
, pp. 104571
304 views DOI Abstract
2020
Pulmonary toxicity of silver vapours, nanoparticles and fine dusts: A review.
Hadrup, Niels;Sharma, Anoop K;Loeschner, Katrin;Jacobsen, Nicklas R;
, pp. 104690
303 views DOI Abstract
2020
Regulations for calcium, magnesium or hardness in drinking water in the European Union member states.
Kozisek, Frantisek;
, pp. 104589
300 views DOI Abstract
2019
Molecular fingerprint-derived similarity measures for toxicological read-across: Recommendations for optimal use.
Mellor, C L;Marchese Robinson, R L;Benigni, R;Ebbrell, D;Enoch, S J;Firman, J W;Madden, J C;Pawar, G;Yang, C;Cronin, M T D;
Vol. 101 , pp. 121-134
284 views DOI Abstract
View All 111 Articles
54
Overall
Average
85
15
30
48
55
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

53.6/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

85.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

48.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

55.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.