Indexed in Journament

Journal of surgical education

ISSN 1878-7452· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #16,593 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
33 Articles
Scores higher than 43.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Surg Educ
Abbreviated Name j surg educ
ISSN 1878-7452
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-surgical-education

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 20.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 14.3 5.8
Content Distribution 56.1 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (33)

An Assessment of the Industry-Faculty Surgeon Relationship Within Colon and Rectum Surgical Training Programs.
Patel, Sunil V;Klingel, Michelle;Sonoda, Toyooki;
Vol. 73 , No. 4 , pp. 595-9
446 views DOI Abstract
2020
Synchronized Video-Review as a Tool to Enhance Reflection and Feedback: A Design-Based Feasibility Study.
Isreb, Siddek;Attwood, Stephen;Hesselgreaves, Hannah;McLachlan, John;Illing, Jan;
430 views DOI Abstract
2019
Verification of Proficiency in Basic Skills for PGY-1 Surgical Residents: 10-Year Update.
Beason, Austin M;Hitt, Collin E;Ketchum, Janet;Rogers, Heather;Sanfey, Hilary;
424 views DOI Abstract
2019
Associations Between Residents' Personal Behaviors and Wellness: A National Survey of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents.
Winkel, Abigail F;Woodland, Mark B;Nguyen, Anh T;Morgan, Helen Kang;
424 views DOI Abstract
Injecting realism in surgical training-initial simulation experience with custom 3D models.
Waran, Vicknes;Narayanan, Vairavan;Karuppiah, Ravindran;Pancharatnam, Devaraj;Chandran, Hari;Raman, Rajagopalan;Rahman, Zainal Ariff Abdul;Owen, Sarah L F;Aziz, Tipu Z;
Vol. 71 , No. 2 , pp. 193-7
403 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of Grading and Class Rank on Performance in a Surgical Simulation Course.
Ferrin, Neal;Zarbock, Tylynn;Tieman, Michael;
389 views DOI Abstract
Break out of the Classroom: The Use of Escape Rooms as an Alternative Teaching Strategy in Surgical Education.
Kinio, Anna Eva;Dufresne, Laurence;Brandys, Tim;Jetty, Prasad;
Vol. 76 , No. 1 , pp. 134-139
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
VR Simulation Leads to Enhanced Procedural Confidence for Surgical Trainees.
Lesch, Heather;Johnson, Evan;Peters, Jörg;Cendán, Juan C;
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Prospective Review of a Novel Electronic Journal Club Format in an Orthopedic Residency Unit.
Clesham, Kevin;Piggott, Robert P;Sheehan, Eoin;
372 views DOI Abstract
2019
Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Best Practices Using Machine Learning to Assess Surgical Expertise in Virtual Reality Simulation.
Winkler-Schwartz, Alexander;Bissonnette, Vincent;Mirchi, Nykan;Ponnudurai, Nirros;Yilmaz, Recai;Ledwos, Nicole;Siyar, Samaneh;Azarnoush, Hamed;Karlik, Bekir;Del Maestro, Rolando F;
342 views DOI Abstract
2024
Assessing Educator Burnout in Online Synchronous Teaching in Surgical Disciplines.
Desai, Veeral;Lee, Daniel J;Lin, Rui Jun;Alvinia, Mohammad;MacNeill, Heather;Chan, Yvonne;
141 views DOI Abstract
2024
How Do Plastic Surgery Program's Websites Feature Diversity and Inclusion Elements? An Analysis of 89 Integrated Plastic Surgery Programs' Websites.
Lewis, Joshua;Patel, Manav;Lee, Wei-Chen;
Vol. 81 , No. 9 , pp. 1229-1238
135 views DOI Abstract
2024
Characteristics and Experiences Associated with Interest in Global Surgery: What Brings US Medical Students to the Field?
Brady, Noah;Peck, Connor;Anderson, Cassandra;Shamim, Abrar;Kersh, Lydia;Gondi, Isha;Rollins, Allison;Subhedar, Shivani;Jayaram, Anusha;Hauser, Blake;Hill, Sarah;Wariso, Bathsheba;Rehman, Shahyan;Clune, James;, ;
Vol. 81 , No. 9 , pp. 1258-1266
80 views DOI Abstract
2024
The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA): An Iterative Approach to Optimize Residents Performance in the American Board of Surgery in-Training Exam (ABSITE).
Shebrain, Saad;Cookenmaster, Caitlyn;Ajine, Mahmoud;Ferrin, Neal;Elian, Alain;Timmons, Jennifer;Munene, Gitonga;Sawyer, Robert G;
104 views DOI Abstract
2024
An Ethical Framework for Disclosing the Training Status and Roles of Resident-Level Surgeons to Patients.
Le, Nhon T;Brandt, Mary L;Majumder, Mary A;
129 views DOI Abstract
2024
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Plastic Surgery: Where Do We Stand? Highlighting Overlooked Issues in Efforts to Improve Representation.
Adebagbo, Oluwaseun D;Guo, Lifei;
Vol. 81 , No. 9 , pp. 1187-1194
112 views DOI Abstract
2024
Do Interns Learn On-The-Job How to Obtain Proper Informed Consent for Surgical Procedures?
Lamb, Michael;Woodward, John M;Quaranto, Brian;White, Bobbie Ann Adair;Harris, Linda M;Lukan, James K;Brewer, Jeffrey;Schwaitzberg, Steven D;Cooper, Clairice A;
Vol. 81 , No. 9 , pp. 1215-1221
130 views DOI Abstract
2024
Unveiling the Need to Improve Personalized Applicant Tools: A Critical Evaluation of the Reliability of the Texas STAR database in Predicting Match Success for Plastic Surgery Applicants.
Ewing, Jane N;Gala, Zachary;Lemdani, Mehdi S;Crystal, Dustin;Broach, Robyn B;Azoury, Said C;
Vol. 81 , No. 9 , pp. 1320-1330
94 views DOI Abstract
2024
Association of USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail Reporting with Interview and Match Outcomes.
Lenze, Nicholas R;Benjamin, William J;Kay, Hannah G;Watkins, Mariel O;Mihalic, Angela P;Bohm, Lauren A;Thorne, Marc C;Kupfer, Robbi A;Brenner, Michael J;
107 views DOI Abstract
2024
Developing Leaders in Surgical Residency: A Curriculum for Success.
Olson, Conner P;Miller, William C;Olson, Shelbi L;Dillon, Bridget S;Brunsvold, Melissa E;
147 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #16,593 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

31.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

14.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

56.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.