Indexed in Journament

Journal of surgical education

ISSN 1878-7452· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.5/100
Journament Score
#9,481
Journament Rank
33
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name J Surg Educ
Abbreviated Name j surg educ
ISSN 1878-7452
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-surgical-education

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (33)

An Assessment of the Industry-Faculty Surgeon Relationship Within Colon and Rectum Surgical Training Programs.
Vol. 73 , No. 4 , pp. 595-9
413 views DOI Abstract
2019
Associations Between Residents' Personal Behaviors and Wellness: A National Survey of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents.
400 views DOI Abstract
2019
Verification of Proficiency in Basic Skills for PGY-1 Surgical Residents: 10-Year Update.
388 views DOI Abstract
Injecting realism in surgical training-initial simulation experience with custom 3D models.
Vol. 71 , No. 2 , pp. 193-7
385 views DOI Abstract
2020
Synchronized Video-Review as a Tool to Enhance Reflection and Feedback: A Design-Based Feasibility Study.
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of Grading and Class Rank on Performance in a Surgical Simulation Course.
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
VR Simulation Leads to Enhanced Procedural Confidence for Surgical Trainees.
362 views DOI Abstract
Break out of the Classroom: The Use of Escape Rooms as an Alternative Teaching Strategy in Surgical Education.
Vol. 76 , No. 1 , pp. 134-139
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Prospective Review of a Novel Electronic Journal Club Format in an Orthopedic Residency Unit.
339 views DOI Abstract
2019
Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Best Practices Using Machine Learning to Assess Surgical Expertise in Virtual Reality Simulation.
324 views DOI Abstract
2024
Assessing Educator Burnout in Online Synchronous Teaching in Surgical Disciplines.
111 views DOI Abstract
2024
2024
Characteristics and Experiences Associated with Interest in Global Surgery: What Brings US Medical Students to the Field?
Vol. 81 , No. 9 , pp. 1258-1266
66 views DOI Abstract
2024
The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA): An Iterative Approach to Optimize Residents Performance in the American Board of Surgery in-Training Exam (ABSITE).
76 views DOI Abstract
2024
Do Interns Learn On-The-Job How to Obtain Proper Informed Consent for Surgical Procedures?
Vol. 81 , No. 9 , pp. 1215-1221
96 views DOI Abstract
2024
Unveiling the Need to Improve Personalized Applicant Tools: A Critical Evaluation of the Reliability of the Texas STAR database in Predicting Match Success for Plastic Surgery Applicants.
Vol. 81 , No. 9 , pp. 1320-1330
67 views DOI Abstract
2024
Association of USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail Reporting with Interview and Match Outcomes.
75 views DOI Abstract
2024
Developing Leaders in Surgical Residency: A Curriculum for Success.
129 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.