Verification of Proficiency in Basic Skills for PGY-1 Surgical Residents: 10-Year Update.
Clicks: 421
ID: 58978
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
81.0
/100
421 views
286 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #3 of 33 articles by views in Journal of surgical education
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The American College of Surgeons and the Association of Program Directors in Surgery developed a curriculum in 2001 that involved instructional modules for 11 basic surgical skills and a standardized Verification of Proficiency (VOP) evaluation instrument. Our institution continues to employ a modified version of this curriculum and the purpose of this study was to provide a 10-year update on our VOP evaluation instrument used to assess postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) residents on surgical skills.All PGY-1 surgical residents over the past 10 years at our institution have completed the American College of Surgeons/the Association of Program Directors in Surgery-adapted basic surgical skills curriculum and VOP assessment. Retrospective analysis of VOP data for all residents was subjected to statistical analysis for internal validity and level of correlation.Department of Surgery at Southern Illinois University School of Medicine located in Springfield, Illinois.All PGY-1 surgical residents (per year: 4 general surgery, 3 orthopedic surgery, 2 plastic surgery, 2 urology, 2 ENT, 1 vascular surgery, and 1 neurosurgery) over the past 10 years.One hundred and thirty five residents underwent VOP evaluation over 10 years; 92 (68%) failed at least 1 module and 40 (30%) failed at least 2 modules. Residents who failed to demonstrate proficiency were mandated to complete remediation and retested until their scores were considered proficient. Performance on checklist items showed moderate internal consistency (⍺ ≥ 0.50) on 9 of 11 modules. Poor internal consistency (⍺ < 0.30) was noted for overall proficiency across all modules. Combined performance on checklist items and economy of time and motion demonstrated significant positive correlation (p < 0.05) with overall proficiency in every module.The VOP instrument offers an internally valid means of assessing distinct basic skills of PGY-1 residents at basic surgical skills. The instrument provides critical formative and summative feedback on surgical skill performance to trainees.
| Reference Key |
beason2019verificationjournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Beason, Austin M;Hitt, Collin E;Ketchum, Janet;Rogers, Heather;Sanfey, Hilary; |
| Journal | Journal of surgical education |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
S1931-7204(19)30275-2
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.