Indexed in Journament

biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the international union of biochemistry and molecular biology

ISSN 1539-3429· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.5 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,109 of 29,297 scored journals (34,017 indexed)
12 Articles
Scores higher than 96.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name biochem mol biol educ
Abbreviated Name biochem mol biol educ
ISSN 1539-3429
URL https://iubmb.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15393429

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 66.7 26.1
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.9 4.9
Content Distribution 90.7 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (12)

2019
Using expert data to inform the use of research methods and representations to enhance biochemistry instruction and textbook design.
Jeffery, Kathleen A;Pelaez, Nancy J;Anderson, Trevor R;
Vol. 47 , No. 5 , pp. 513-531
507 views DOI Abstract
2019
Simulated sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for a cost-effective investigation of natural and engineered cellular signaling pathways.
Jaschke, Paul R;
503 views DOI Abstract
2019
The horseradish smile: Demonstrating characteristic reactions of peroxidase in a visually appealing way.
Panzarasa, Guido;
445 views DOI Abstract
2019
Music notes to amino acid sequence: A STEAM approach to study protein structure.
Acan, Sinan Can;Acan, Naciye Leyla;
435 views DOI Abstract
2019
Teaching structural diversity of hexoses to graduate and postgraduate students: Methods to correlate stereochemistry.
Arya, Aditya;Kumar, Amit;
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hybrid Images as Part of the Primary School Chemistry Class Instruction: Mastering the Concepts of Amino Acids and Proteins.
Rončević, Tamara N;Sedlar, Agneš;Rodić, Dušica D;Segedinac, Mirjana D;
424 views DOI Abstract
2019
Genomics Course Design and Combined Teaching Strategy to Enhance Learning Initiatives in Classroom.
Ouyang, Liming;Zhang, Huizhan;Zhang, Xuexin;Wu, Haizhen;
422 views DOI Abstract
2020
Biochemistry course-based undergraduate research experience: Purification, characterization, and identification of an unknown lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme.
Chaari, Ali;Al-Ali, Dana;Roach, James;
421 views DOI Abstract
2019
A comprehensive practical laboratory course on protein engineering: Evolution of a glycine oxidase variant active on the herbicide glyphosate.
Rosini, Elena;Pollegioni, Loredano;
420 views DOI Abstract
2020
Lab experience with seafood control at the undergraduate level: Cephalopods as a case study.
Fernández, Sara;Rodríguez-Muñiz, Luis J;Molina, Jara;Muñiz-Rodríguez, Laura;Jiménez, Juan;García-Vázquez, Eva;Borrell, Yaisel J;
371 views DOI Abstract
2020
Biochemistry course-based undergraduate research experience: Purification, characterization, and identification of an unknown lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme.
Chaari, Ali;Al-Ali, Dana;Roach, James;
421 views DOI Abstract
2020
Lab experience with seafood control at the undergraduate level: Cephalopods as a case study.
Fernández, Sara;Rodríguez-Muñiz, Luis J;Molina, Jara;Muñiz-Rodríguez, Laura;Jiménez, Juan;García-Vázquez, Eva;Borrell, Yaisel J;
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Creating custom Foldit puzzles for teaching biochemistry.
Dsilva, Lorna;Mittal, Shubhi;Koepnick, Brian;Flatten, Jeff;Cooper, Seth;Horowitz, Scott;
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 133-139
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Genomics Course Design and Combined Teaching Strategy to Enhance Learning Initiatives in Classroom.
Ouyang, Liming;Zhang, Huizhan;Zhang, Xuexin;Wu, Haizhen;
422 views DOI Abstract
2019
The horseradish smile: Demonstrating characteristic reactions of peroxidase in a visually appealing way.
Panzarasa, Guido;
445 views DOI Abstract
2019
Using expert data to inform the use of research methods and representations to enhance biochemistry instruction and textbook design.
Jeffery, Kathleen A;Pelaez, Nancy J;Anderson, Trevor R;
Vol. 47 , No. 5 , pp. 513-531
507 views DOI Abstract
2019
Simulated sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for a cost-effective investigation of natural and engineered cellular signaling pathways.
Jaschke, Paul R;
503 views DOI Abstract
2019
Teaching structural diversity of hexoses to graduate and postgraduate students: Methods to correlate stereochemistry.
Arya, Aditya;Kumar, Amit;
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
Music notes to amino acid sequence: A STEAM approach to study protein structure.
Acan, Sinan Can;Acan, Naciye Leyla;
435 views DOI Abstract
2019
A comprehensive practical laboratory course on protein engineering: Evolution of a glycine oxidase variant active on the herbicide glyphosate.
Rosini, Elena;Pollegioni, Loredano;
420 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
42.5/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,109 of 29,297 scored
(34,017 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

66.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

90.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.