Indexed in Journament

acs synthetic biology

ISSN 2161-5063· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #4,956 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
17 Articles
Scores higher than 83% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Kurzname acs synth biol
Abgekürzter Name acs synth biol
ISSN 2161-5063
URL http://pubs.acs.org/journal/asbcd6

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for acs synthetic biology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 70.0 9.2
Diversity 27.8 25.8
Innovation 51.0 27.4
Community Impact 11.4 7.8
Content Distribution 60.1 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2019
Top-down Enrichment Guides in Formation of Synthetic Microbial Consortia for Biomass Degradation.
416 views DOI Abstract
2019
SBOL-OWL: An Ontological Approach for Formal and Semantic Representation of Synthetic Biology Information.
Vol. 8 , No. 7 , pp. 1498-1514
407 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of a vanillate biosensor for the vanillin biosynthesis pathway in E. coli.
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
A broad-host-range CRISPRi toolkit for silencing gene expression in .
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
CRISPR/Cas12a mediated genome editing to introduce amino acid substitutions into the mechanosensitive channel MscCG of .
Vol. 8 , pp. 2726-2734
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reinforcement Learning for Bio-Retrosynthesis.
338 views DOI Abstract
2020
Securing the Exchange of Synthetic Genetic Constructs Using Digital Signatures.
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
Robust characterization of two distinct glutarate sensing transcription factors of </i>Pseudomonas putida<i> L-lysine metabolism.
315 views DOI Abstract
2026
A liquid handling platform for standardised quantification of cell-free enzymatic activity encoded by antimicrobial resistance genes
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
A CURE for synthetic regulation of gene expression: rapid screening of guide RNA efficacy as a framework for enabling undergraduate research in plant synthetic biology
23 views DOI Abstract
2020
Securing the Exchange of Synthetic Genetic Constructs Using Digital Signatures.
326 views DOI Abstract
2020
From Electronic Sequence to Purified Protein Using Automated Gene Synthesis and Transcription/Translation.
Vol. 9 , No. 7 , pp. 1714-1724
232 views DOI Abstract
2020
A Bifunctional Polyphosphate Kinase Driving the Regeneration of Nucleoside Triphosphate and Reconstituted Cell-Free Protein Synthesis.
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 36-42
277 views DOI Abstract
2019
SBOL-OWL: An Ontological Approach for Formal and Semantic Representation of Synthetic Biology Information.
Vol. 8 , No. 7 , pp. 1498-1514
407 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
39.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #4,956 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

27.8/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

51.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

11.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

70.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

60.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.