Indexed in Journament

international journal of performability engineering

EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,365 of 33,995 indexed journals
23 Articles
Accessibility 35
Engagement 30
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name international journal of performability engineering
Abbreviated Name international journal of performability engineering
URL https://www.ijpe-online.com

Publications Per Year

Articles (23)

2019
Establishing world cultural heritage sites resource allocation system and management system based on neural network algorithm—a case on hailongtun tusi site
Ren W.
Vol. 15 , pp. 547-558
383 views DOI
2017
prevalence of late-onset pompe disease in portuguese patients with diaphragmatic paralysis – dipper study
;M.J. Guimarães;J.C. Winck;B. Conde;A. Mineiro;M. Raposo;J. Moita;A. Marinho;J.M. Silva;N. Pires;S. André;C. Loureiro
Vol. 23 , No. 4 , pp. 208-215
308 views Abstract
2017
impulse oscillometry, spirometry, and passive smoking in healthy children and adolescents
;C.I.S. Schivinski;M.S. de Assumpção;F.C.X.S. de Figueiredo;R.M.G. Wamosy;L.G. Ferreira;J.D. Ribeiro
Vol. 23 , No. 6 , pp. 311-316
278 views DOI Abstract
2019
Simulation method for mission reliability assessment of space telemetry tracking and command system with dynamic redundancy
Yu, H.
Vol. 15 , pp. 1684-1691
265 views DOI
2017
tuberculosis in children from diagnosis to decision to treat
;S. Ramos;R. Gaio;F. Ferreira;J. Paulo Leal;S. Martins;J. Vasco Santos;I. Carvalho;R. Duarte
Vol. 23 , No. 6 , pp. 317-322
265 views DOI Abstract
2013
urinothorax as an unusual type of pleural effusion – case report and review
;P.G. Ferreira;F. Furriel;A.J. Ferreira
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 80-83
250 views Abstract
2015
evaluation of clinical presentation and outcome of patients with respiratory bronchiolitis-associated interstitial lung disease
;M. Vaz;N. Melo;P.C. Mota;R. Cunha;J.M. Pereira
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 47-48
239 views
2017
gln223arg polymorphism in the caucasian population and pro1019pro polymorphism in the chinese population are risk factors for osas: an updated meta-analysis of 1159 subjects
;B. Xu;J. Liu;T. Li;S. Liu
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 62-70
226 views Abstract
2017
are we missing obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis?
;G. Lorenzi-Filho;P.R. Genta;L.F. Drager
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 55-56
218 views
2017
understanding patient adherence to inhaled medication: the social representations of copd
;A. Duarte-de-Araújo;P. Teixeira;M. Figueiredo;V. Hespanhol;J. Correia-de-Sousa
Vol. 23 , No. 6 , pp. 358-359
195 views DOI
2019
Simulation method for mission reliability assessment of space telemetry tracking and command system with dynamic redundancy
Yu, H.
Vol. 15 , pp. 1684-1691
265 views DOI
2019
Establishing world cultural heritage sites resource allocation system and management system based on neural network algorithm—a case on hailongtun tusi site
Ren W.
Vol. 15 , pp. 547-558
383 views DOI
2018
Evaluation of teaching effectiveness based on classroom micro-expression recognition
Guo, X.
Vol. 14 , pp. 2877-2885
85 views DOI
2017
prevalence of late-onset pompe disease in portuguese patients with diaphragmatic paralysis – dipper study
;M.J. Guimarães;J.C. Winck;B. Conde;A. Mineiro;M. Raposo;J. Moita;A. Marinho;J.M. Silva;N. Pires;S. André;C. Loureiro
Vol. 23 , No. 4 , pp. 208-215
308 views Abstract
2017
high-flow nasal oxygen is not an oxygen therapy device
;S. Díaz-Lobato;J.M. Alonso;J.M. Carratalá;S. Mayoralas
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 51-52
112 views
2017
gln223arg polymorphism in the caucasian population and pro1019pro polymorphism in the chinese population are risk factors for osas: an updated meta-analysis of 1159 subjects
;B. Xu;J. Liu;T. Li;S. Liu
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 62-70
226 views Abstract
2017
copd: a controversial disease?
;A. Araújo
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 173-174
16 views
2017
impulse oscillometry, spirometry, and passive smoking in healthy children and adolescents
;C.I.S. Schivinski;M.S. de Assumpção;F.C.X.S. de Figueiredo;R.M.G. Wamosy;L.G. Ferreira;J.D. Ribeiro
Vol. 23 , No. 6 , pp. 311-316
278 views DOI Abstract
2017
understanding patient adherence to inhaled medication: the social representations of copd
;A. Duarte-de-Araújo;P. Teixeira;M. Figueiredo;V. Hespanhol;J. Correia-de-Sousa
Vol. 23 , No. 6 , pp. 358-359
195 views DOI
2017
the frequency of lung cancer in patients with pulmonary hamartomas: an evaluation of clinical, radiological, and pathological features and follow-up data of 96 patients with pulmonary hamartomas
;G.H. Ekinci;O. Hacıömeroğlu;A. Ersev;L. Alpay;H. Özgen;A. Yılmaz
Vol. 23 , No. 5 , pp. 280-286
78 views Abstract
Journament Score
39.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,365 of 33,995
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.