The Plant cell | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5471 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
100
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

The Plant cell

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name Plant Cell
Abbreviated Name plant cell
ISSN 1532-298X
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.plantcell.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (257 total)

2019
Genome-wide reinforcement of DNA methylation occurs during somatic embryogenesis in soybean.
Ji, Lexiang;Mathioni, Sandra;Johnson, Sarah;Tucker, Donna;Bewick, Adam J;Kim, Kyung Do;Daron, Josquin;Slotkin, R Keith;Jackson, Scott A;Parrott, Wayne Allen;Meyers, Blake C;Schmitz, Robert;
364 views DOI Abstract
2016
Pollen-Specific Aquaporins NIP4;1 and NIP4;2 Are Required for Pollen Development and Pollination in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Di Giorgio, Juliana Andrea Pérez;Bienert, Gerd Patrick;Ayub, Nicolás Daniel;Yaneff, Agustín;Barberini, María Laura;Mecchia, Martín Alejandro;Amodeo, Gabriela;Soto, Gabriela Cynthia;Muschietti, Jorge Prometeo;
Vol. 28 , No. 5 , pp. 1053-77
323 views DOI Abstract
2019
Computational image analysis for microscopy (by Adrienne Roeder).
Vol. 31 , No. 10
311 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fusarium virguliforme Transcriptional Plasticity Is Revealed by Host Colonization of Corn vs. Soybean.
Baetsen-Young, Amy;Wai, Ching Man;VanBuren, Robert;Day, Brad;
306 views DOI Abstract
2010
The {gamma}-tubulin complex protein GCP4 is required for organizing functional microtubule arrays in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Kong, Zhaosheng;Hotta, Takashi;Lee, Yuh-Ru Julie;Horio, Tetsuya;Liu, Bo;
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 191-204
278 views DOI Abstract
2016
An Untranslated cis-Element Regulates the Accumulation of Multiple C4 Enzymes in Gynandropsis gynandra Mesophyll Cells.
Williams, Ben P;Burgess, Steven J;Reyna-Llorens, Ivan;Knerova, Jana;Aubry, Sylvain;Stanley, Susan;Hibberd, Julian M;
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 454-65
273 views DOI Abstract
2020
Sterile Spikelets Contribute to Yield in Sorghum and Related Grasses.
AuBuchon-Elder, Taylor;Coneva, Viktoriya;Goad, David M;Jenkins, Lauren M;Yu, Yunqing;Allen, Doug K;Kellogg, Elizabeth A;
Vol. 32 , No. 11 , pp. 3500-3518
264 views DOI Abstract
2004
Widespread Paleopolyploidy in Model Plant Species Inferred from Age Distributions of Duplicate Genes
Guillaume Blanc;Kenneth H. Wolfe;Guillaume Blanc;Kenneth H. Wolfe;
Vol. 16 , No. 7 , pp. 1667-1678
261 views DOI Abstract
2020
A Pair of Arabidopsis Diacylglycerol Kinases Essential for Gametogenesis and Endoplasmic Reticulum Phospholipid Metabolism in Leaves and Flowers.
Angkawijaya, Artik Elisa;Nguyen, Van Cam;Gunawan, Farrel;Nakamura, Yuki;
Vol. 32 , No. 8 , pp. 2602-2620
257 views DOI Abstract
2020
Developmental Genetics of Corolla Tube Formation: Role of the tasiRNA-ARF Pathway and a Conceptual Model.
Ding, Baoqing;Xia, Rui;Lin, Qiaoshan;Gurung, Vandana;Sagawa, Janelle M;Stanley, Lauren E;Strobel, Matthew;Diggle, Pamela K;Meyers, Blake C;Yuan, Yao-Wu;
Vol. 32 , No. 11 , pp. 3452-3468
249 views DOI Abstract
View All 257 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
33
100
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.