Indexed in Journament

psychiatric services (washington, dc)

ISSN 1557-9700· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.7/100
Journament Score
#1,518
Journament Rank
19
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name psychiatr serv
Abbreviated Name psychiatr serv
ISSN 1557-9700
URL http://psychservices.psychiatryonline.org

Indexings

scopus ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (19)

2011
An online recovery plan program: can peer coaching increase participation?
Vol. 62 , No. 6 , pp. -
409 views Abstract
2017
Qualitative Analysis of Resources and Barriers Related to Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder in the United States
Vol. 68 , No. 2 , pp. -
407 views Abstract
2019
A Commercial Insurance Claims Analysis of Correlates of Behavioral Therapy Use Among Children With ADHD.
, pp. appips201800473
353 views DOI Abstract
2017
Expedited Medicaid Enrollment, Service Use, and Recidivism at 36 Months Among Released Prisoners With Severe Mental Illness.
Vol. 68 , No. 10 , pp. 1079-1082
331 views DOI Abstract
2016
An Evaluation of SOAR: Implementation and Outcomes of an Effort to Improve Access to SSI and SSDI.
Vol. 67 , No. 10 , pp. 1098-1102
330 views Abstract
2019
Defining Success in Measurement-Based Care for Depression: A Comparison of Common Metrics.
, pp. appips201900295
329 views DOI Abstract
2018
Methadone Maintenance Treatment for Older Adults: Cost and Logistical Considerations.
Vol. 69 , No. 3 , pp. 338-340
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
Focused Ethnographic Examination of Barriers to Use of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics.
, pp. appips201900236
320 views DOI Abstract
2019
Forecast: Increasing Mental Health Consequences From Atlantic Hurricanes Throughout the 21st Century.
, pp. appips201900273
312 views DOI Abstract
2020
Serious Games, Gamification, and Serious Mental Illness: A Scoping Review
Vol. 71 , pp. 170-183
300 views DOI
2020
Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Staff Perceptions of Recovery Climate and Culture in Mental Health Programs.
, pp. appips201900181
169 views DOI Abstract
2020
Serious Games, Gamification, and Serious Mental Illness: A Scoping Review
Vol. 71 , pp. 170-183
300 views DOI
2020
Reasons for Frequent Psychiatric Emergency Service Use in a Large Urban Center.
, pp. appips201800532
245 views DOI Abstract
2020
Contents and Intensity of Services in Low- and High-Fidelity Programs for Supported Employment: Results of a Longitudinal Survey.
, pp. appips201900255
270 views DOI Abstract
2019
Focused Ethnographic Examination of Barriers to Use of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics.
, pp. appips201900236
320 views DOI Abstract
2019
Defining Success in Measurement-Based Care for Depression: A Comparison of Common Metrics.
, pp. appips201900295
329 views DOI Abstract
2019
Forecast: Increasing Mental Health Consequences From Atlantic Hurricanes Throughout the 21st Century.
, pp. appips201900273
312 views DOI Abstract
2019
Screening and Intervention for Suicide Prevention: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the ED-SAFE Interventions.
, pp. appips201800445
265 views DOI Abstract
2019
Efficacy of the Home-Based Mental Health Evaluation (HOME) Program for Engaging Patients in Care After Hospitalization.
, pp. appips201900002
236 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Commercial Insurance Claims Analysis of Correlates of Behavioral Therapy Use Among Children With ADHD.
, pp. appips201800473
353 views DOI Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

42.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.