psychiatric services (washington, dc) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1381 / 33,973
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

psychiatric services (washington, dc)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name psychiatr serv
Abbreviated Name psychiatr serv
ISSN 1557-9700
Aim and Scope
URL http://psychservices.psychiatryonline.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (19 total)

2011
An online recovery plan program: can peer coaching increase participation?
Simon GE;Ludman EJ;Goodale LC;Dykstra DM;Stone E;Cutsogeorge D;Operskalski B;Savarino J;Pabiniak C;;
Vol. 62 , No. 6 , pp. -
396 views Abstract
2017
Qualitative Analysis of Resources and Barriers Related to Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder in the United States
Lohman MC;Whiteman KL;Yeomans FE;Cherico SA;Christ WR;;
Vol. 68 , No. 2 , pp. -
390 views Abstract
2019
A Commercial Insurance Claims Analysis of Correlates of Behavioral Therapy Use Among Children With ADHD.
Waxmonsky, James G;Baweja, Raman;Liu, Guodong;Waschbusch, Daniel A;Fogel, Benjamin;Leslie, Doug;Pelham, William E;
, pp. appips201800473
344 views DOI Abstract
2017
Expedited Medicaid Enrollment, Service Use, and Recidivism at 36 Months Among Released Prisoners With Severe Mental Illness.
Grabert, Brigid K;Gertner, Alex K;Domino, Marisa Elena;Cuddeback, Gary S;Morrissey, Joseph P;
Vol. 68 , No. 10 , pp. 1079-1082
322 views DOI Abstract
2016
An Evaluation of SOAR: Implementation and Outcomes of an Effort to Improve Access to SSI and SSDI.
Kauff, Jacqueline F;Clary, Elizabeth;Lupfer, Kristin Sue;Fischer, Pamela J;
Vol. 67 , No. 10 , pp. 1098-1102
317 views Abstract
2019
Defining Success in Measurement-Based Care for Depression: A Comparison of Common Metrics.
Coley, R Yates;Boggs, Jennifer M;Beck, Arne;Hartzler, Andrea L;Simon, Gregory E;
, pp. appips201900295
316 views DOI Abstract
2018
Methadone Maintenance Treatment for Older Adults: Cost and Logistical Considerations.
Cotton, Brandi P;Bryson, William Culbertson;Bruce, Martha L;
Vol. 69 , No. 3 , pp. 338-340
316 views DOI Abstract
2019
Focused Ethnographic Examination of Barriers to Use of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics.
Robinson, Delbert G;Subramaniam, Anant;Fearis, Paul J;Shi, Richard;Walsh, Megan;Hanna, Lauren A;Kane, John M;
, pp. appips201900236
310 views DOI Abstract
2019
Forecast: Increasing Mental Health Consequences From Atlantic Hurricanes Throughout the 21st Century.
Espinel, Zelde;Kossin, James P;Galea, Sandro;Richardson, Anne S;Shultz, James M;
, pp. appips201900273
301 views DOI Abstract
2020
Serious Games, Gamification, and Serious Mental Illness: A Scoping Review
Fitzgerald, M.
Vol. 71 , pp. 170-183
293 views DOI
View All 19 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.