Indexed in Journament

journal of proteomics

ISSN 1876-7737· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.9 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #3,539 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
383 Articles
Scores higher than 87.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j proteomics
Abbreviated Name j proteomics
ISSN 1876-7737
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-proteomics

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of proteomics
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 73.3 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 8.6 7.8
Content Distribution 71.3 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (383)

2019
Proteomic analyses on xylem sap provides insights into the defense response of Gossypium hirsutum against Verticillium dahliae.
Vol. 213 , pp. 103599
550 views DOI Abstract
2015
Impacts on silkworm larvae midgut proteomics by transgenic Trichoderma strain and analysis of glutathione S-transferase sigma 2 gene essential for anti-stress response of silkworm larvae.
Vol. 126 , pp. 218-27
533 views DOI Abstract
2015
Quantitative changes in proteins responsible for flavonoid and anthocyanin biosynthesis in strawberry fruit at different ripening stages: A targeted quantitative proteomic investigation employing multiple reaction monitoring.
Vol. 122 , pp. 1-10
496 views DOI Abstract
2020
Hepatic proteomic analysis of selenoprotein F knockout mice by iTRAQ: An implication for the roles of selenoprotein F in metabolism and diseases.
, pp. 103653
490 views DOI Abstract
2016
Comparative leaf proteomics of drought-tolerant and -susceptible peanut in response to water stress.
Vol. 143 , pp. 209-226
489 views DOI Abstract
2017
The important functionality of 14-3-3 isoforms in rice roots revealed by affinity chromatography.
Vol. 158 , pp. 20-30
478 views DOI Abstract
2002
integrated care bridges the care gap
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. -
459 views
2018
iTRAQ-based analysis of the Arabidopsis proteome reveals insights into the potential mechanisms of anthocyanin accumulation regulation in response to phosphate deficiency.
Vol. 184 , pp. 39-53
454 views DOI Abstract
2000
fully integrated care for frail elderly: two american models
Vol. 1 , pp. -
453 views DOI Abstract
2003
is there a relationship between service integration and differentiation and patient outcomes?
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. -
438 views Abstract
2020
Milk microbiota: Characterization methods and role in cheese production
Vol. 210 , pp. -
287 views Abstract
2020
building a people-centred integrated care model in urban china: a qualitative study of the health reform in luohu
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. -
262 views DOI Abstract
2020
2020
Impact of high dietary plant protein with or without marine ingredients in gut mucosa proteome of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata, L.).
Vol. 216 , pp. 103672
323 views DOI Abstract
2020
Clostridium cellulovorans metabolism of cellulose as studied by comparative proteomic approach.
, pp. 103667
355 views DOI Abstract
2020
Hepatic proteomic analysis of selenoprotein F knockout mice by iTRAQ: An implication for the roles of selenoprotein F in metabolism and diseases.
, pp. 103653
490 views DOI Abstract
2019
interdisciplinary education and research as a basis for the integration of social and health care
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. -
290 views DOI Abstract
2019
the integrated care performance assessment tool: a co-design approach
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. -
365 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
40.9/100 · Below Average
Ranked #3,539 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

40.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

73.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.