journal of proteomics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#94 / 33,718
πŸ“Š Below Average
Overall Score
47.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
81
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
55
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 months ago

journal of proteomics

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • βœ… Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • βœ… Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • βœ… No iframe limitations
  • βœ… Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • βœ… Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • βœ… Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name j proteomics
Abbreviated Name j proteomics
ISSN 1876-7737
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (383 total)

2015
Impacts on silkworm larvae midgut proteomics by transgenic Trichoderma strain and analysis of glutathione S-transferase sigma 2 gene essential for anti-stress response of silkworm larvae.
Li, Yingying;Dou, Kai;Gao, Shigang;Sun, Jianan;Wang, Meng;Fu, Kehe;Yu, Chuanjin;Wu, Qiong;Li, Yaqian;Chen, Jie;
Vol. 126 , pp. 218-27
453 views DOI Abstract
2019
Proteomic analyses on xylem sap provides insights into the defense response of Gossypium hirsutum against Verticillium dahliae.
Yang, Jun;Wang, Xingfen;Xie, Meixia;Wang, Guoning;Li, Zhikun;Zhang, Yan;Wu, Liqiang;Zhang, Guiyin;Ma, Zhiying;
Vol. 213 , pp. 103599
427 views DOI Abstract
2015
Quantitative changes in proteins responsible for flavonoid and anthocyanin biosynthesis in strawberry fruit at different ripening stages: A targeted quantitative proteomic investigation employing multiple reaction monitoring.
Song, Jun;Du, Lina;Li, Li;Kalt, Wilhelmina;Palmer, Leslie Campbell;Fillmore, Sherry;Zhang, Ying;Zhang, ZhaoQi;Li, XiHong;
Vol. 122 , pp. 1-10
404 views DOI Abstract
2020
Hepatic proteomic analysis of selenoprotein F knockout mice by iTRAQ: An implication for the roles of selenoprotein F in metabolism and diseases.
Zheng, Xiaoxiang;Ren, Bingyu;Wang, Heng;Huang, Ruikun;Zhou, Jun;Liu, Hongmei;Tian, Jing;Huang, Kaixun;
, pp. 103653
380 views DOI Abstract
2002
integrated care bridges the care gap
;Guus Schrijvers
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. -
364 views
2000
fully integrated care for frail elderly: two american models
;Dennis L. Kodner;Corinne Kay Kyriacou
Vol. 1 , pp. -
361 views DOI Abstract
2018
iTRAQ-based analysis of the Arabidopsis proteome reveals insights into the potential mechanisms of anthocyanin accumulation regulation in response to phosphate deficiency.
Wang, Zhan Qi;Zhou, Xiulian;Dong, Lixiang;Guo, Jiena;Chen, Yueyue;Zhang, Yuyuan;Wu, Lifang;Xu, Maojun;
Vol. 184 , pp. 39-53
357 views DOI Abstract
2016
Comparative leaf proteomics of drought-tolerant and -susceptible peanut in response to water stress.
Katam, Ramesh;Sakata, Katsumi;Suravajhala, Prashanth;Pechan, Tibor;Kambiranda, Devaiah M;Naik, Karamthot Sivasankar;Guo, Baozhu;Basha, Sheikh M;
Vol. 143 , pp. 209-226
355 views DOI Abstract
2003
is there a relationship between service integration and differentiation and patient outcomes?
;Robin P. Newhouse;Mary Etta Mills;Meg Johantgen;Peter J. Pronovost
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. -
355 views Abstract
2017
The important functionality of 14-3-3 isoforms in rice roots revealed by affinity chromatography.
Zhang, Zhixing;Zhang, Yiping;Zhao, Hong;Huang, Fenglian;Zhang, Zefeng;Lin, Wenxiong;
Vol. 158 , pp. 20-30
347 views DOI Abstract
View All 383 Articles
48
Overall
Below Average
81
15
30
40
55
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

47.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

81.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

55.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.