journal of mammalogy | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1488 / 33,938
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
60
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

journal of mammalogy

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim sci
Short Name j mammal
Abbreviated Name j mammal
ISSN 0022-2372
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.asmjournals.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2019
The platypus: evolutionary history, biology, and an uncertain future.
Bino, Gilad;Kingsford, Richard T;Archer, Michael;Connolly, Joanne H;Day, Jenna;Dias, Kimberly;Goldney, David;Gongora, Jaime;Grant, Tom;Griffiths, Josh;Hawke, Tahneal;Klamt, Melissa;Lunney, Daniel;Mijangos, Luis;Munks, Sarah;Sherwin, William;Serena, Melody;Temple-Smith, Peter;Thomas, Jessica;Williams, Geoff;Whittington, Camilla;
Vol. 100 , No. 2 , pp. 308-327
312 views DOI Abstract
2017
bankruptcy prediction of industrial industry in the uk
;Wong Ming Nok
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 1-26
297 views DOI Abstract
2017
analysis of factors affect to organizational performance in using accounting information systems through users satisfaction and integration information systems
;Anton Arisman;Lukluk Fuadah
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 167-180
183 views DOI Abstract
2017
the determinants of sell-side analysts’ forecast accuracy and media exposure
;Samira Amadu Sorogho
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 133-152
154 views DOI Abstract
2017
behaviour of follower investor in the formation of stock’s price on market crash
;I Gusti Ayu Nyoman Budiasih;Made Dewi Ayu Untari;I Made Sadha Suardikha;I Ketut Suryanawa
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 27-50
96 views DOI Abstract
2017
the influence of abnormal audit fee and auditor switching toward opinion shopping
;Ririn Nawalin;Indah Anis Syukurillah
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 103-118
41 views DOI Abstract
2017
How many species of mammals are there?
Connor Burgin, Jocelyn P. Colella, Philip L Kahn, Nathan S. Upham
19 views DOI Abstract
2011
Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research
Robert S. Sikes, William L. Gannon
18 views DOI Abstract
2007
Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the Use of Wild Mammals in Research
William L. Gannon, Robert S. Sikes
18 views DOI Abstract
2016
2016 Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education:
Robert S. Sikes
14 views DOI Abstract
View All 21 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
34
60
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.